Long-term Rate of Mesh Sling Removal Following Midurethral Mesh Sling Insertion Among Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence

被引:92
|
作者
Gurol-Urganci, IPek [1 ,2 ]
Geary, Rebecca S. [1 ,2 ]
Mamza, Jil B. [1 ,2 ]
Duckett, Jonathan [3 ]
El-Hamamsy, Dina [4 ]
Dolan, Lucia [5 ]
Tincello, Douglas G. [6 ]
van der Meulen, Jan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
[2] Royal Coll Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Lindsay Stewart Ctr Audit & Clin Informat, London, England
[3] Medway Hosp, Gillingham, Kent, England
[4] Univ Hosp Leicester, Leicester Gen Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Leicester, Leics, England
[5] Belfast City Hosp, Dept Gynaecol, Lisburn Rd, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
[6] Univ Leicester, Coll Life Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Leicester, Leics, England
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2018年 / 320卷 / 16期
关键词
PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; SURGICAL-PROCEDURES; TUTORIAL;
D O I
10.1001/jama.2018.14997
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE There is concern about outcomes of midurethral mesh sling insertion for women with stress urinary incontinence. However, there is little evidence on long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE To examine long-term mesh removal and reoperation rates in women who had a midurethral mesh sling insertion for stress urinary incontinence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based retrospective cohort study included 95 057 women aged 18 years or older who had a first-ever midurethral mesh sling insertion for stress urinary incontinence in the National Health Service hospitals in England between April 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015. Women were followed up until April 1, 2016. EXPOSURES Patient and hospital factors and retropubic or transobturator mesh sling insertions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was the risk of midurethral mesh sling removal (partial or total) and secondary outcomes were reoperation for stress urinary incontinence and any reoperation including mesh removal, calculated with death as competing risk. A multivariable Fine-Gray model was used to calculate subdistribution hazard ratios as estimates of relative risk. RESULTS The study population consisted of 95 057 women (median age, 51 years; interquartile range, 44-61 years) with first midurethral mesh sling insertion, including 60 194 with retropubic insertion and 34 863 with transobturator insertion. The median follow-up time was 5.5 years (interquartile range, 3.2-7.5 years). The rate of midurethral mesh sling removal was 1.4% (95% CI, 1.3%-1.4%) at 1 year, 2.7% (95% CI, 2.6%-2.8%) at 5 years, and 3.3% (95% CI, 3.2%-3.4%) at 9 years. Risk of removal declined with age. The 9-year removal risk after transobturator insertion (2.7% [95% CI, 2.4%-2.9%]) was lower than the risk after retropubic insertion (3.6% [95% CI, 3.5%-3.8%]; subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.62-0.84]). The rate of reoperation for stress urinary incontinence was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.3%-1.4%) at 1 year, 3.5% (95% CI, 3.4%-3.6%) at 5 years, and 4.5% (95% CI, 4.3%-4.7%) at 9 years. The rate of any reoperation, including mesh removal, was 2.6% (95% CI, 2.5%-2.7%) at 1 year, 5.5% (95% CI, 5.4%-5.7%) at 5 years, and 6.9% (95% CI, 6.7%-7.1%) at 9 years. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among women undergoing midurethral mesh sling insertion, the rate of mesh sling removal at 9 years was estimated as 3.3%. These findings may guide women and their surgeons when making decisions about surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
引用
收藏
页码:1659 / 1669
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条