Trends in timing of prenatal diagnosis and abortion for fetal chromosomal abnormalities

被引:31
|
作者
Hume, Heather [1 ]
Chasen, Stephen T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Weill Med Coll, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
abortion; Down syndrome; noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT); prenatal diagnosis; UNITED-STATES POPULATION; GESTATIONAL-AGE; ANEUPLOIDY; RISK; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.008
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate changes in the timing of prenatal diagnosis and abortion for chromosomal abnormalities over the past 10 years. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective review identified singleton pregnancies with fetal chromosomal abnormalities that were diagnosed from 2005-2014 and included Down syndrome, Trisomy 18, and Trisomy 13. The study period was divided into 3 intervals: 2005-2006; 2007-2011; and 2012-2014. Gestational ages at prenatal diagnosis and abortion were compared over these intervals. RESULTS: The 213 cases included 142 cases of Down syndrome (66.7%), 47 cases of Trisomy 18 (22.1%), and 24 cases of Trisomy 13 (11.3%). Two hundred one women (94.4%) chose to undergo abortion. The median gestational ages at prenatal diagnosis and abortion for Trisomy 18 or 13 were 12 weeks (interquartile range, 12-13 weeks) and 13 weeks (interquartile range, 12-15.5 weeks) and did not change over the study period. In contrast, in pregnancies with Down syndrome, the median gestational age at prenatal diagnosis (16, 13, and 12 weeks; P<. 001) and abortion (17, 14, and 13 weeks; P <.001) both decreased significantly over the study intervals. In Down syndrome pregnancies, the proportion of women who underwent chorionic villus sampling significantly increased over the 3 study intervals (36%, 63%, and 86%; P <.001). CONCLUSION: Since 2005, the gestational ages at prenatal diagnosis and abortion for Down syndrome have declined significantly. These changes are likely attributable to improvements in early screening that leads to higher rates of chorionic villus sampling.
引用
收藏
页码:545.e1 / 545.e4
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Trends in timing of prenatal diagnosis and abortion for fetal chromosomal abnormalities
    Hume, Heather
    Chasen, Stephen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (01) : S388 - S388
  • [2] Abortion for fetal indications: Timing of prenatal diagnosis and abortion for structural and genetic abnormalities
    Friedman, Caroline F.
    Chasen, Stephen T.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2020, 101 (05) : 293 - 295
  • [3] Prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosomal abnormalities
    不详
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (05): : C1 - C11
  • [4] CHROMOSOMAL-ABNORMALITIES IN ABORTION AND PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS - DIAGNOSTIC AND CLINICAL PROBLEMS
    LINDSTEN, J
    THERKELS.AJ
    BULLETIN OF THE EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1973, (OCT): : 21 - 23
  • [5] Minor ultrasonographic findings with major fetal chromosomal abnormalities in prenatal diagnosis
    Pavel, A. G.
    Ursuleanu, A.
    Dimos, L.
    Tutulan-Cunita, A.
    Stambouli, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2019, 27 : 878 - 879
  • [6] Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of lymphangiomas and its relationship with fetal chromosomal abnormalities
    Arisoy, Resul
    Erdogdu, Emre
    Kumru, Pinar
    Demirci, Oya
    Yuksel, Mehmet Aytac
    Pekin, Oya
    Tugrul, Semih
    Aydin, Hatip
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2016, 29 (03): : 466 - 472
  • [7] Detection of chromosomal abnormalities and monogenic variants in fetal cfDNA for prenatal diagnosis
    Zhang, Jinglan
    Huang, Hefeng
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2024, 30 (02) : 352 - 353
  • [9] Chromosomal abnormalities found in prenatal diagnosis
    Trojovsky, A
    Zierler, H
    Häusler, M
    Emberger, W
    Kroisel, PM
    Wagner, K
    CYTOGENETICS AND CELL GENETICS, 1999, 85 (1-2): : 60 - 60
  • [10] PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHROMOSOMAL ABNORMALITIES CHORIONIC VILLOUS SAMPLING AND AMNIOCENTESIS FOR FETAL KARYOTYPING
    Moises Huaman, G.
    Isabel Quiroga de Michelena, Maria
    St Martin, Brad
    Moises Huaman, J.
    REVISTA PERUANA DE GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2016, 62 (03): : 269 - 277