Measuring spatial scoring effectiveness in women's basketball at the 2016 Olympic Games

被引:1
|
作者
Hobbs, Wade [1 ,2 ]
Gorman, Adam D. [3 ]
Morgan, Stuart [4 ]
Mooney, Mitchell [1 ]
Freeston, Jonathan [2 ]
机构
[1] Australian Inst Sport, Bruce, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Exercise Hlth & Performance, Lidcombe, Australia
[3] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Hlth & Sport Sci, Sunshine Coast, Australia
[4] La Trobe Univ, Coll Sci Hlth & Engn, Bundoora, Vic, Australia
关键词
Basketball; effectiveness; analytics; spatio-temporal; team sports;
D O I
10.1080/24748668.2018.1550892
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Basketball strategy is often focused on how to use space on the court. However, very little research has investigated performance from a spatial perspective beyond the now ubiquitous shooting heat maps. The aim of this study was to quantify how effectively teams move the ball across the basketball court and identify the most commonly occurring sequences of ball movement in international women's basketball. The results of the spatial analysis characterised trends in team play from the women's 2016 Olympic basketball competition and demonstrated that overall, the right-hand side under the basket and the top-right 3-point area were the most-effective areas on the court. In general terms, the right-hand side of the court was more effective than the left, and the middle of the court was more effective than the wings. Of the teams included in the study, the United States of America demonstrated the greatest overall effectiveness. Finally, the most commonly occurring ball movement sequences were identified with five of the seven teams demonstrating the same pattern. The quantification of spatial effectiveness in the current study provides insight into the specific tendencies of different teams and the areas that lead to the most effective outcomes. Coaches can apply this information to devise game plans aimed at counteracting the specific tendencies of opposing teams.
引用
收藏
页码:1037 / 1049
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Serving Patterns of Women's Badminton Medalists in the Rio 2016 Olympic Games
    Gomez-Ruano, Miguel-Angel
    Cid, Adrian
    Rivas, Fernando
    Ruiz, Luis-Miguel
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [2] Measuring countries’ performance at the Summer Olympic Games in Rio 2016
    Flegl M.
    Andrade L.A.
    OPSEARCH, 2018, 55 (3-4) : 823 - 846
  • [3] Israel’s country image in the 2016 Olympic Games
    Yoav Dubinsky
    Lars Dzikus
    Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 2019, 15 : 173 - 184
  • [4] Israel's country image in the 2016 Olympic Games
    Dubinsky, Yoav
    Dzikus, Lars
    PLACE BRANDING AND PUBLIC DIPLOMACY, 2019, 15 (03) : 173 - 184
  • [5] An Examination of the Public's Twitter Usage of Youth Olympic Games and Olympic Games from 2010 to 2016
    Yoon, Juha
    Pedersen, Paul M.
    JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 7 (01) : 71 - 88
  • [6] The participating team's technical analysis of women's basketball in the 30th Olympic Games based on neural network
    Wu, Liang
    Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2013, 5 (11) : 152 - 158
  • [7] Explaining Match Outcome during The Men's Basketball Tournament at The Olympic Games
    Leicht, Anthony S.
    Gomez, Miguel A.
    Woods, Carl T.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCE AND MEDICINE, 2017, 16 (04) : 468 - 473
  • [8] The 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games and Brazil's soft power
    de Almeida, Barbara Schausteck
    Marchi Junior, Wanderley
    Pike, Elizabeth
    CONTEMPORARY SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2014, 9 (02) : 271 - 283
  • [9] The Second Women's Olympic Games, Gothenburg, 1926
    Annerstedt, Claes
    Annerstedt, Marie
    Barker-Ruchti, Natalie
    Grahn, Karin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF SPORT, 2025,
  • [10] Technical Analysis of the 2016 Rio Olympic Games Women's Single Table Tennis Championship Competition
    Sung, Ching-Yi
    Huang, Chyong-Huoy
    Chen, Yu-Fen
    PROCEEDINGS BOOK OF THE 15TH ITTF SPORTS SCIENCE CONGRESS, 2017, : 334 - 341