Korean Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations: Updates in the Third Version

被引:12
|
作者
Bae, Eun-Young [1 ]
Hong, Jihyung [2 ]
Bae, SeungJin [3 ]
Hahn, Seokyung [4 ]
An, Hyonggin [5 ]
Hwang, Eun-joo [6 ]
Lee, Seung-min [6 ]
Lee, Tae-jin [7 ]
机构
[1] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Coll Pharm, Jinju Si, Gyeongnam, South Korea
[2] Gachon Univ, Coll Social Sci, Dept Healthcare Management, Seongnam Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[3] Ewha Womans Univ, Coll Pharm, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Korea Univ, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Hlth Insurance Review & Assessment Serv, Pharmaceut Benefit Listing Div, Wonju, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[7] Seoul Natl Univ, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 08826, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s40258-022-00721-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The first version of the pharmacoeconomic (PE) guidelines was published in South Korea in 2006. Despite its first revision in 2011, there were still ambiguities in its interpretation. Moreover, methodologies for estimating effectiveness and costs have also evolved since then. Under these circumstances, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service published the third version in January 2021. This article reviews the revision process and major changes made in the new edition of the PE guidelines. The revision was processed through reviews of the previous 50 PE submissions, international guidelines, academic literature, and surveys and advisory meetings to obtain stakeholders' opinions. The analysis perspective has changed from a limited societal perspective to a healthcare system perspective. In addition to the drug with the highest market share, drugs used in clinical trials can be selected as comparators under certain conditions. The discount rate decreased from 5% to 4.5%. Furthermore, the revised guidelines provide more detailed and specific instructions for items including non-inferiority margin, extrapolation, utility elicitation, and uncertainty. Treatment switch and co-dependent technology guidelines are newly included; the budget impact analysis guideline is deleted. Through this revision, transparency and consistency of decision-making is expected to improve.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 477
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Korean Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations: Updates in the Third Version
    Eun-Young Bae
    Jihyung Hong
    SeungJin Bae
    Seokyung Hahn
    Hyonggin An
    Eun-joo Hwang
    Seung-min Lee
    Tae-jin Lee
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2022, 20 : 467 - 477
  • [2] Korean Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation (Second and Updated Version)Consensus and Compromise
    SeungJin Bae
    SooOk Lee
    Eun Young Bae
    Sunmee Jang
    PharmacoEconomics, 2013, 31 : 257 - 267
  • [3] Korean Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation (Second and Updated Version) Consensus and Compromise
    Bae, SeungJin
    Lee, SooOk
    Bae, Eun Young
    Jang, Sunmee
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2013, 31 (04) : 257 - 267
  • [4] Pharmacoeconomic Evaluations: Guidelines for Drug Purchasers
    Langley, Paul C.
    Sullivan, Sean D.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2020, 26 (06): : 689 - 695
  • [5] CHALLENGES AND APPLICATIONS OF CHINESE GUIDELINES FOR PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATIONS
    Wu, J.
    Yue, X.
    Liu, G. G.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S51 - S51
  • [6] Project of Polish guidelines for conducting pharmacoeconomic evaluations in comparison to international health economic guidelines
    Ewa Orlewska
    Piotr Mierzejewski
    The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC , 2003, 4 (4): : 296 - 303
  • [7] EGYPTIAN GUIDELINES FOR PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATIONS: TOWARD STANDARDIZATION OF DRUG REIMBURSEMENT APPLICATIONS
    Roushdy, M.
    Elsisi, G.
    Sedrak, A. S.
    Elagamy, A.
    Seyam, A.
    Eldebeiky, M.
    Eldessouki, R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2023, 26 (12) : S386 - S386
  • [8] Melanoma, Version 4.2014 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
    Coit, Daniel G.
    Thompson, John A.
    Andtbacka, Robert
    Anker, Christopher J.
    Bichakjian, Christopher K.
    Carson, William E., III
    Daniels, Gregory A.
    Daud, Adil
    DiMaio, Dominick
    Fleming, Martin D.
    Gonzalez, Rene
    Guild, Valerie
    Halpern, Allan C.
    Hodi, Stephen, Jr.
    Kelley, Mark C.
    Khushalani, Nikhil I.
    Kudchadkar, Ragini R.
    Lange, Julie R.
    Martini, Mary C.
    Olszanski, Anthony J.
    Ross, Merrick I.
    Salama, April
    Swetter, Susan M.
    Tanabe, Kenneth K.
    Trisal, Vijay
    Urist, Marshall M.
    McMillian, Nicole R.
    Ho, Maria
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2014, 12 (05): : 621 - 629
  • [9] Updates in version 2.2018 of the NCCN guidelines for gastric cancer
    Liu Huang
    OncologyandTranslationalMedicine, 2018, 4 (03) : 120 - 123
  • [10] Survivorship, Version 1.2023 Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines
    Sanft, Tara
    Day, Andrew
    Ansbaugh, Shannon
    Armenian, Saro
    Baker, K. Scott
    Ballinger, Tara
    Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy
    Dickinson, Kristin
    Fairman, Nathan Paul
    Felciano, Josephine
    Flores, Tessa Faye
    Friedman, Debra L.
    Gabel, Nicolette M.
    Goldman, Mindy
    Henry, Norah Lynn
    Hill-Kayser, Christine
    Hudson, Melissa
    Koura, Divya
    Lee, Kimberly
    Mcdonough, Allison L.
    Melisko, Michelle
    Mooney, Kathi
    Moore, Halle C. F.
    Moryl, Natalie
    Neuman, Heather
    O'Connor, Tracey
    Overholser, Linda
    Paskett, Electra D.
    Patel, Chirayu
    Peterson, Lindsay
    Pirl, William
    Porpiglia, Andrea
    Rodriguez, M. Alma
    Schapira, Lidia
    Schwartz, Anna L.
    Smith, Sophia
    Tevaarwerk, Amye
    Yang, Eric
    Zee, Phyllis
    McMillian, Nicole R.
    Freedman-Cass, Deborah A.
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2023, 21 (08): : 792 - 803