Hierarchical benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms

被引:14
|
作者
Yang, Zhao [1 ]
Perotti, Juan I. [2 ,3 ]
Tessone, Claudio J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, URPP Social Networks, Andreasstr 15, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, Piazza San Francesco 19, I-55100 Lucca, Italy
[3] Univ Nacl Cordoba, CONICET, IFEG, Ciudad Univ, RA-5000 Cordoba, Argentina
关键词
STOCHASTIC BLOCKMODELS; PREDICTION; ORIGINS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevE.96.052311
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Hierarchical organization is an important, prevalent characteristic of complex systems; to understand their organization, the study of the underlying (generally complex) networks that describe the interactions between their constituents plays a central role. Numerous previous works have shown that many real-world networks in social, biologic, and technical systems present hierarchical organization, often in the form of a hierarchy of community structures. Many artificial benchmark graphs have been proposed to test different community detection methods, but no benchmark has been developed to thoroughly test the detection of hierarchical community structures. In this study, we fill this vacancy by extending the Lancichinetti-Fortunato-Radicchi (LFR) ensemble of benchmark graphs, adopting the rule of constructing hierarchical networks proposed by Ravasz and Barabasi. We employ this benchmark to test three of the most popular community detection algorithms and quantify their accuracy using the traditional mutual information and the recently introduced hierarchical mutual information. The results indicate that the Ravasz-Barabasi-Lancichinetti-Fortunato-Radicchi (RB-LFR) benchmark generates a complex hierarchical structure constituting a challenging benchmark for the considered community detection methods.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms
    Lancichinetti, Andrea
    Fortunato, Santo
    Radicchi, Filippo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2008, 78 (04)
  • [2] GLFR: A Generalized LFR Benchmark for Testing Community Detection Algorithms
    Le, Ba-Dung
    Nguyen, Hung X.
    Shen, Hong
    Falkner, Nickolas
    2017 26TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKS (ICCCN 2017), 2017,
  • [3] Mosaic Benchmark Networks: Modular Link Streams for Testing Dynamic Community Detection Algorithms
    Asgari, Yasaman
    Cazabet, Remy
    Borgnat, Pierre
    COMPLEX NETWORKS & THEIR APPLICATIONS XII, VOL 2, COMPLEX NETWORKS 2023, 2024, 1142 : 209 - 222
  • [4] Benchmarks for testing community detection algorithms on directed and weighted graphs with overlapping communities
    Lancichinetti, Andrea
    Fortunato, Santo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2009, 80 (01)
  • [5] Community Detection by Resistance Distance: Automation and Benchmark Testing
    Gancio, Juan
    Rubido, Nicolas
    COMPLEX NETWORKS & THEIR APPLICATIONS X, VOL 1, 2022, 1015 : 309 - 320
  • [6] Benchmark graphs for the evaluation of Clustering Algorithms
    Moussiades, Lefteris
    Vakali, Athena
    RCIS 2009: PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2009, : 197 - +
  • [7] Fault detection of hierarchical networks with probabilistic testing algorithms
    Li, KQ
    Lee, D
    TESTING OF COMMUNICATING SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 3502 : 258 - 274
  • [8] Evaluating community detection algorithms for progressively evolving graphs
    Cazabet, Remy
    Boudebza, Souaad
    Rossetti, Giulio
    JOURNAL OF COMPLEX NETWORKS, 2020, 8 (06)
  • [9] ALGORITHMS FOR CONSTRUCTING HIERARCHICAL GRAPHS
    SHYAMASUNDAR, RK
    KRISHNAMURTHY, EV
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1974, SMC4 (05): : 459 - 461
  • [10] A Parallel LFR-like Benchmark for Evaluating Community Detection Algorithms
    Slota, George M.
    Garbus, Jack
    2020 IEEE 34TH INTERNATIONAL PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM WORKSHOPS (IPDPSW 2020), 2020, : 1112 - 1115