Third-Party Intervention in Peer Victimization: Self-Evaluative Emotions and Appraisals of a Diverse Adolescent Sample

被引：8

作者：

Frey, Karin S. ^{[1
]}

Strong, Zoe Higheagle ^{[2
]}

Onyewuenyi, Adaurennaya C. ^{[3
]}

Pearson, Cynthia R. ^{[1
]}

Eagan, Brendan R. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Washington, Miller Hall,Box 353600, Seattle, WA 98195 USA

[2] Washington State Univ, Pullman, WA 99164 USA

[3] Coll New Jersey, Ewing, NJ USA

[4] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON ADOLESCENCE | 2020年 / 30卷 / 03期

基金：

美国国家科学基金会;

关键词：

PROSOCIAL TENDENCIES; BYSTANDER RESPONSES; MORAL DISENGAGEMENT; MEXICAN-AMERICAN; BULLYING ROLE; 3RD PARTIES; SHAME; AGGRESSION; CHILDRENS; BEHAVIOR;

D O I：

10.1111/jora.12548

中图分类号：

D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];

学科分类号：

1204 ;

摘要：

African American, European American, Mexican American, and Native American adolescents (N = 270) described how they felt and appraised their own actions in response to a peer's victimization. Analyses compared times they had calmed victim emotions, amplified anger, avenged, and resolved conflicts peacefully. Adolescents felt prouder, more helpful, more like a good friend, and expected more peer approval after calming and resolving than after amplifying anger or avenging peers. They also felt less guilt and shame after calming and resolving. Avenging elicited more positive self-evaluation than amplifying. Epistemic network analyses explored links between self-evaluative and other emotions. Pride was linked to relief after efforts to calm or resolve. Third-party revenge reflected its antisocial and prosocial nature with connections between pride, relief, anger, and guilt.

引用

页码：633 / 650

页数：18