Switchgrass, Bermudagrass, Flaccidgrass, and Lovegrass biomass yield response to nitrogen for single and double harvest

被引:27
|
作者
Aravindhakshan, Sijesh C. [1 ]
Epplin, Francis M. [1 ]
Taliaferro, Charles M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
来源
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY | 2011年 / 35卷 / 01期
关键词
Cellulosic biomass; Harvest frequency; Linear response stochastic plateau; Nitrogen; Perennial grasses; Response function; CORN; FERTILIZATION; FREQUENCY; ETHANOL; MANAGEMENT; FEEDSTOCK; ECONOMICS; BIOFUELS; GRASSES; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.042
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) has been identified as a model dedicated energy crop species. After a perennial grass is established, the major variable costs are for nitrogen (N) fertilizer and harvest. Prior to establishing switchgrass on millions of ha in a particular agro-climatic region, it would be useful to determine switchgrass yield response to N and its response to harvest frequency relative to alternative grass species. The objective of this research is to determine biomass yield response to N for four perennial grass species and to determine the species, N level, and harvest frequency that will maximize expected net returns, given the climate and soils of the U.S.A. Southern Plains. Yield data were produced in an experiment that includes four species (switchgrass, bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), weeping lovegrass (Eragrostis curvula), and carostan flaccidgrass (Pennisetum flaccidum)), four N levels, and two harvest levels. Linear response plateau (LRP), linear response stochastic plateau (LRSP), and quadratic response (QR) functions are estimated. For all combinations of biomass and N prices considered, the optimal species is switchgrass. For most price situations, it is economically optimal to fertilize established stands of switchgrass with 69 kg N ha(-1) yr(-1) and to harvest once yr(-1) after senescence. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 319
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nitrogen Fertilization and Harvest Management of Switchgrass: Impacts on Biomass Yield and Nitrogen Removal
    Michael D. Casler
    BioEnergy Research, 2023, 16 : 369 - 378
  • [2] Nitrogen Fertilization and Harvest Management of Switchgrass: Impacts on Biomass Yield and Nitrogen Removal
    Casler, Michael D.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2023, 16 (01) : 369 - 378
  • [3] Yield and Nutrient Concentration Response to Switchgrass Biomass Harvest Date
    Gouzaye, Amadou
    Epplin, Francis M.
    Wu, Yanqi
    Makaju, Shiva O.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (03) : 793 - 799
  • [4] Response of Switchgrass Yield and Quality to Harvest Season and Nitrogen Fertilizer
    Sadeghpour, A.
    Gorlitsky, L. E.
    Hashemi, M.
    Weis, S. A.
    Herbert, S. J.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2014, 106 (01) : 290 - 296
  • [5] Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization and Residual Nitrogen on Biomass Yield of Switchgrass
    Springer, Tim L.
    BIOENERGY RESEARCH, 2017, 10 (03) : 648 - 656
  • [6] Effect of Nitrogen Fertilization and Residual Nitrogen on Biomass Yield of Switchgrass
    Tim L. Springer
    BioEnergy Research, 2017, 10 : 648 - 656
  • [7] Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: Harvest and nitrogen management
    Vogel, KP
    Brejda, JJ
    Walters, DT
    Buxton, DR
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (03) : 413 - 420
  • [8] Nitrogen removal in switchgrass biomass under two harvest systems
    Reynolds, JH
    Walker, CL
    Kirchner, MJ
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2000, 19 (05): : 281 - 286
  • [9] Effects of nitrogen rate and harvest time on biomass yield and nutrient cycling of switchgrass and soil nitrogen balance in a semiarid sandy wasteland
    Ameen, Asif
    Liu, Jintong
    Han, Lipu
    Xie, Guang Hui
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2019, 136 : 1 - 10
  • [10] Nitrogen and Harvest Management Effects on Switchgrass and Mixed Perennial Biomass Production
    Sawyer, Anne
    Rosen, Carl
    Lamb, John
    Sheaffer, Craig
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2018, 110 (04) : 1260 - 1273