Effect of pharmacist interventions on reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Dixon, Dave L. [1 ,2 ]
Khaddage, Sarah [1 ]
Bhagat, Shailja [1 ]
Koenig, Rachel A. [3 ]
Salgado, Teresa M. [1 ,2 ]
Baker, William L. [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Pharmacotherapy & Outcomes Sci, Sch Pharm, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Ctr Pharm Practice Innovat, Sch Pharm, 1112 E Clay St,Box 980533, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, VCU Lib, Tompkins McCaw Lib Hlth Sci, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[4] Univ Connecticut, Sch Pharm, Dept Pharm Practice, Storrs, CT USA
关键词
Pharmacists; Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; Meta-analysis; Statins; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE PROGRAM; MEDICATION-THERAPY MANAGEMENT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; DIABETES-MELLITUS; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; PCSK9; INHIBITORS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; DISEASE RISK; OUTCOMES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jacl.2020.04.004
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines recommend team-based care as one strategy to improve dyslipidemia outcomes. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that pharmacist interventions reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to conduct a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of pharmacist interventions on reducing LDL-C levels. METHODS: A literature search of RCTs published after January 1, 2000 was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Included RCTs evaluated a pharmacist intervention compared with usual care, reported baseline and follow-up LDL-C levels, and enrolled at least 100 patients. Mean differences in LDL-C and other lipid parameters were calculated using a random effects model. RESULTS: Twenty-six RCTs (n = 22,095 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with usual care, pharmacist interventions significantly reduced LDL-C levels by -7.9 mg/dL (95% confidence interval (CI) -11.43 to -4.35; I-2 = 94%). A subgroup analysis revealed a greater reduction in LDL-C (-13.73 mg/dL; 95% CI -24.07 to -3.40; I-2 = 96%) when LDL-C was the sole primary outcome. Significant improvements in total cholesterol (-12.73 mg/dL, 95% CI -19.18 to -6.27), triglycerides (-13.25 mg/dL, 95% CI -26.10 to -0.41), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.75 mg/dL, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.46) were also found. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist interventions significantly reduced LDL-C levels compared with usual care. Further research is warranted to determine the optimal pharmacist intervention for reducing LDL-C levels and to evaluate the comprehensive role of pharmacists in lipid management. (C) 2020 National Lipid Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:282 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of estimated low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c) equations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Richard K. D. Ephraim
    Emmanuel Ativi
    Samuel A. Ashie
    Albert Abaka-Yawson
    Kwame Osei Darkwah
    Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 47 (1)
  • [2] Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C): How Low?
    Whayne, Thomas F., Jr.
    CURRENT VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 15 (04) : 374 - 379
  • [3] Effect of clinical pharmacist intervention on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) outcomes in an ambulatory setting
    Guy-Alfandary, S
    Lavi, S
    Raz, M
    Triki, N
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 271 - 271
  • [4] Reducing Cardiovascular Risk: Is Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) Lowering Enough?
    Kostapanos, Michael S.
    Katsiki, Niki
    Elisaf, Moses S.
    Mikhailidis, Dimitri P.
    CURRENT VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 10 (02) : 173 - 177
  • [5] Effect of Lipoprotein(a) on Stroke Recurrence Attenuates at Low LDL-C (Low-Density Lipoprotein) and Inflammation Levels
    Xu, Jie
    Hao, Xiwa
    Zhan, Rui
    Jiang, Xue
    Jin, Aoming
    Xue, Jing
    Cheng, Aichun
    Liu, Jiewen
    Lin, Jinxi
    Meng, Xia
    Li, Hao
    Zheng, Lemin
    Wang, Yongjun
    STROKE, 2022, 53 (08) : 2504 - 2511
  • [6] EVOLOCUMAB-INDUCED PARADOXICAL RISE OF LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL (LDL-C) LEVELS
    Yee, Brianna
    Dugal, Jasmine
    Dicaro, Michael
    Lee, Ki
    Malhotra, Sanjay
    Ahsan, Chowdhury H.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 2855 - 2855
  • [7] Review of cholesterol management and the impact of interventions on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals as defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP)
    Vanderbush, EJ
    Wong, SL
    ADVANCES IN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2001, : 357 - 361
  • [8] Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhou, Zhike
    Liang, Yifan
    Zhang, Xiaoqian
    Xu, Junjie
    Lin, Jueying
    Zhang, Rongwei
    Kang, Kexin
    Liu, Chang
    Zhao, Chuansheng
    Zhao, Mei
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 12
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of different doses of evolocumab in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: A meta-analysis
    Cheng, Cheng
    Sun, Sijia
    Zhou, Yafeng
    Yang, Xiangjun
    BIOMEDICAL REPORTS, 2016, 5 (05) : 541 - 547
  • [10] Exploring the Efficacy of Alirocumab and Evolocumab in Reducing Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol Levels in Patients With Familial Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review
    Luthra, Gaurav
    Shahbaz, Mahrukh
    Almatooq, Halah
    Foucambert, Paul
    Esbrand, Faith
    Zafar, Sana
    Panthangi, Venkatesh
    Kurupp, Adrienne R. Cyril
    Raju, Anjumol
    Khan, Safeera
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (09)