How does green entrepreneurship affect environmental improvement? Empirical findings from 293 enterprises

被引:21
|
作者
Zeng, Juying [1 ]
Ren, Jun [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ City Coll, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Data Sci, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Environmental regulation; Green entrepreneurship; Green innovation; Difference-in-difference; Triple difference method; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL-CHANGE; ECO-INNOVATION; REGULATIONS; PERFORMANCE; INTEGRATION; CAPABILITY; POLLUTION; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1007/s11365-021-00780-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Enterprises tend to change their production and emission behaviours to foster green entrepreneurship under endogenous innovation development pressure and exogenous environmental regulation. This research innovatively establishes a theoretical framework on the dual dynamic linkage of environmental regulation and green entrepreneurship. Based on the sample data of 293 thermoelectric industry enterprises during 2017-2020, this empirical research first measures green entrepreneurship with the entropy method and finds that Zhejiang has cultivated green entrepreneurship at a primary level. Green entrepreneurship witnessed growth from 2016 to 2019. The dynamic regression identification then validates the stimulatory effect of environmental regulation on green entrepreneurship cultivation through internal competitiveness enhancement. Finally, with the application of the triple difference method (DDD), this research verifies that green entrepreneurship is positive in cultivating technological innovation and significantly facilitates environmental regulation to achieve better regulation effects through overall enterprise pollution emissions, total sulfur dioxide emissions, and total nitrogen oxide emissions. It is necessary to coordinate all aspects to cultivate green entrepreneurship and green growth in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 434
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] How does green entrepreneurship affect environmental improvement? Empirical findings from 293 enterprises
    Juying Zeng
    Jun Ren
    International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2022, 18 : 409 - 434
  • [2] How Does Policy Perception Affect Green Entrepreneurship Behavior? An Empirical Analysis from China
    Chu, Fengdi
    Zhang, Wei
    Jiang, Yuan
    DISCRETE DYNAMICS IN NATURE AND SOCIETY, 2021, 2021
  • [3] How does environmental regulations affect digital green innovation of high-pollution enterprises? Empirical evidence from China
    Chen, Jinyu
    Chen, Zekun
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [4] How does green finance affect the innovation performance of enterprises? Evidence from China
    Liu, Chao
    Dai, Congcong
    Chen, Shuai
    Zhong, Junjing
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (35) : 84516 - 84536
  • [5] How does green finance affect the innovation performance of enterprises? Evidence from China
    Chao Liu
    Congcong Dai
    Shuai Chen
    Junjing Zhong
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 84516 - 84536
  • [6] Digitization and green innovation: how does digitization affect enterprises' green technology innovation?
    Xu, Qiong
    Li, Xin
    Dong, Yu
    Guo, Fei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025, 68 (06) : 1282 - 1311
  • [7] How Does Green Investment Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from China
    Ren, Siyu
    Hao, Yu
    Wu, Haitao
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2022, 81 (01): : 25 - 51
  • [8] How Does Green Investment Affect Environmental Pollution? Evidence from China
    Siyu Ren
    Yu Hao
    Haitao Wu
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2022, 81 : 25 - 51
  • [9] How does the green credit policy affect the technological innovation of enterprises? Evidence from China
    Zhang, Shengling
    Wu, Zihao
    He, Yinan
    Hao, Yu
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 113
  • [10] How does demographic structure affect environmental quality? Empirical evidence from China
    Zhang, Zongyong
    Hao, Yu
    Lu, Zhi-Nan
    Deng, Yuxin
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 133 : 242 - 249