Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3 % desflurane

被引:40
|
作者
Sloan, Tod B. [1 ]
Toleikis, J. Richard [2 ]
Toleikis, Sandra C. [3 ]
Koht, Antoun [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Denver Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Anschutz Off West AO1, Aurora, CO 80045 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Rush Med Coll, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Northwestern Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[5] Northwestern Univ, Dept Neurosurg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[6] Northwestern Univ, Dept Neurol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
Propofol; Desflurane; Total intravenous anesthesia; Somatosensory evoked potentials; Motor evoked potentials; Spinal surgery; MOTOR-EVOKED-POTENTIALS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; NITROUS-OXIDE ANESTHESIA; GENERAL-ANESTHETICS; INHALED ANESTHETICS; ISOFLURANE; VARIABILITY; MECHANISMS; SUPPRESSION; HALOTHANE;
D O I
10.1007/s10877-014-9571-9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and opioids is frequently utilized for spinal surgery when somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs) are monitored. Many anesthesiologists would prefer to utilize low dose halogenated anesthetics (e.g. 1/2 MAC). We examined our recent experience using 3 % desflurane or TIVA during spine surgery to determine the impact on propofol usage and on the evoked potential responses. After institutional review board approval we conducted a retrospective review of a 6 month period for adult spine patients who were monitored with SSEPs and tcMEPs. Cases were included for the study if anesthesia was conducted with propofol-opioid TIVA or 3 % desflurane supplemented with propofol or opioid infusions as needed. We evaluated the propofol infusion rate, cortical amplitudes of the SSEPs (median nerve, posterior tibial nerve), amplitudes and stimulation voltage for eliciting the tcMEPs (adductor pollicis brevis, tibialis anterior) and the amplitude variability of the SSEP and tcMEP responses as assessed by the average percentage trial to trial change. Of the 156 spine cases included in the study, 95 had TIVA with propofol-opioid (TIVA) and 61 had 3 % expired desflurane (INHAL). Three INHAL cases were excluded because the desflurane was eliminated because of inadequate responses and 26 cases (16 TIVA and 10 INHAL) were excluded due to significant changes during monitoring. Propofol infusion rates in the INHAL group were reduced from the TIVA group (average 115-45 mu g/kg/min) (p < 0.00001) with 21 cases where propofol was not used. No statistically significant differences in cortical SSEP or tcMEP amplitudes, tcMEP stimulation voltages nor in the average trial to trial amplitude variability were seen. The data from these cases indicates that 1/2 MAC (3 %) desflurane can be used in conjunction with SSEP and tcMEP monitoring for some adult patients undergoing spine surgery. Further studies are needed to confirm the relative benefits versus negative effects of the use of desflurane and other halogenated agents for anesthesia during procedures on neurophysiological monitoring involving tcMEPs. Further studies are also needed to characterize which patients may or may not be candidates for supplementation such as those with neural dysfunction or who are opioid tolerant from chronic use.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 85
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery with total intravenous anesthesia or balanced anesthesia with 3 % desflurane
    Tod B. Sloan
    J. Richard Toleikis
    Sandra C. Toleikis
    Antoun Koht
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2015, 29 : 77 - 85
  • [2] Methohexital in total intravenous anesthesia during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
    Tod B. Sloan
    Jacqueline Vasquez
    Evalina Burger
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2013, 27 : 697 - 702
  • [3] Methohexital in total intravenous anesthesia during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
    Sloan, Tod B.
    Vasquez, Jacqueline
    Burger, Evalina
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2013, 27 (06) : 697 - 702
  • [4] Effects of intraoperative propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia on postoperative pain in spine surgery Comparison with desflurane anesthesia - a randomised trial
    Lin, Wei-Lin
    Lee, Meei-Shyuan
    Wong, Chih-Shung
    Chan, Shun-Ming
    Lai, Hou-Chuan
    Wu, Zhi-Fu
    Lu, Chueng-He
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (13)
  • [5] Intraoperative monitoring of identifiable visual evoked potentials during spine surgery under total intravenous anesthesia.
    Torres, RJ
    Albini, T
    Chen, T
    Samudrala, S
    Laskota, W
    Smith, T
    Sadun, AA
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U151 - U151
  • [6] Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
    Tod B. Sloan
    Paul Mongan
    Clark Lyda
    Antoun Koht
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2014, 28 : 139 - 147
  • [7] Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
    Sloan, Tod B.
    Mongan, Paul
    Lyda, Clark
    Koht, Antoun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2014, 28 (02) : 139 - 147
  • [8] Comparison of visual evoked potential monitoring during spine surgeries under total intravenous anesthesia versus balanced general anesthesia
    Uribe, Alberto A.
    Mendel, Ehud
    Peters, Zoe A.
    Shneker, Bassel F.
    Abdel-Rasoul, Mahmoud
    Bergese, Sergio D.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 128 (10) : 2006 - 2013
  • [9] Potency of mivacurium during desflurane anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia in adults
    Ott, A
    Lakenberg, C
    Priebe, HJ
    Geiger, K
    NoldgeSchomburg, GFE
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) : A841 - A841
  • [10] Potency of rocuronium during desflurane anesthesia versus total intravenous anesthesia in adults
    Lakenberg, C
    Ott, A
    Priebe, HJ
    Geiger, K
    NoldgeSchomburg, GFE
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (03) : A832 - A832