Comparison of clinically indicated replacement and routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:5
|
作者
Chen, Ching-Yi [1 ]
Chen, Wang-Chun [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Jung-Yueh [4 ,5 ]
Lai, Chih-Cheng [6 ]
Wei, Yu-Feng [3 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] I Shou Univ, E Da Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Pulm Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] I Shou Univ, E Da Hosp, Dept Pharm, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] I Shou Univ, Inst Biotechnol & Chem Engn, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] I Shou Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] E Da Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[6] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Div Hosp Med, Dept Internal Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[7] E Da Canc Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[8] I Shou Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med Int Students, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
关键词
catheter-related infection; peripheral intravenous catheter; PIVC; phlebitis; routine replacement; clinically indicated replacement; COMPLICATIONS; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.964096
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: It is unknown whether clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) increases the risks of PIVC-associated complications and infections compared to routine replacement of PIVCs. Methods: We searched PubMed, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compare the safety outcomes of routine replacement and clinically indicated replacement of PIVCs were included for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the incidence of phlebitis, and secondary outcomes included the risks of occlusion, local infection, infiltration, catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and accidental removal of the PIVC. Results: A total of 9 RCTs involving 10 973 patients were included in this meta-analysis, of whom 5,546 and 5,527 were assigned to the study group (clinically indicated replacement of PIVCs) and control group (routine replacement of PIVCs every 72-96 h), respectively. The incidence of phlebitis in the study group was significantly higher than that in the control group [risk ratio (RR), 1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.44, P = 0.04, I-2 = 49%]. In addition, the study group was associated with a higher risk of occlusion (RR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.08-1.95, P = 0.01, I-2 = 82%) and infiltration (fluid leaks) (RR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.06-1.53, P = 0.01, I-2 = 72%) than the control group. However, no significant differences were observed in the risks of local infection (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.38-8.16, P = 0.48, I-2 = 0%) and CRBSI (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.08-4.68, P = 0.64, I-2 = 0%) between the study and control groups. Conclusion: The clinically indicated replacement of PIVCs may increase the risks of PIVC-associated phlebitis, infiltration, and occlusion compared to the routine replacement of PIVCs, but did not increase the risk of PIVC-associated infections. Based on these findings, routine replacement of PIVCs every 72-96 h maybe a preferred option than clinically indicated replacement of PIVCs.Systematic review registration[], identifier [CRD42022302021].
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Routine Replacement With Clinically Indicated Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters
    Buetti, Niccolo
    Abbas, Mohamed
    Pittet, Didier
    de Kraker, Marlieke E. A.
    Teixeira, Daniel
    Chraiti, Marie-Noelle
    Sauvan, Valerie
    Sauser, Julien
    Harbarth, Stephan
    Zingg, Walter
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 181 (11) : 1471 - 1478
  • [2] The safety of clinically indicated replacement or routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: A randomized controlled study
    Lu, Huapeng
    Yang, Qinling
    Nor, Hilal Mohamed
    Lv, Yi
    Zheng, Xuemei
    Xin, Xia
    Feng, Aifang
    Sun, Yali
    Zhou, Xiaoling
    Zhang, Li
    Qu, Yan
    Li, Juanli
    Guo, Xiaoye
    Yang, Yali
    Jiao, Jianfang
    Xie, Na
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2022, 23 (03): : 436 - 442
  • [3] Routine Replacement or Clinically Indicated Replacement of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters
    Foumani, Sarah Amouei
    Paryad, Ezzat
    Khanghah, Atefeh Ghanbari
    Leili, Ehsan Kazemnezhad
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 23 (03)
  • [4] Routine care of peripheral intravenous catheters versus clinically indicated replacement: randomised controlled trial
    Webster, Joan
    Clarke, Samantha
    Paterson, Dana
    Hutton, Anne
    van Dyk, Stacey
    Gale, Catherine
    Hopkins, Tracey
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7662): : CP1 - CP1
  • [5] Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial
    Rickard, Claire M.
    Webster, Joan
    Wallis, Marianne C.
    Marsh, Nicole
    McGrail, Matthew R.
    French, Venessa
    Foster, Lynelle
    Gallagher, Peter
    Gowardman, John R.
    Zhang, Li
    McClymont, Alice
    Whitby, Michael
    LANCET, 2012, 380 (9847): : 1066 - 1074
  • [6] Clinically indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters
    Vick, Andrew M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2013, 11 (04): : 339 - 340
  • [7] Clinically Indicated Replacement Versus Routine Replacement of Peripheral Venous Catheters
    Cooper, Adam S.
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2019, 39 (04) : 67 - 68
  • [8] Cost-effectiveness analysis of clinically indicated versus routine replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters
    Tuffaha H.W.
    Rickard C.M.
    Webster J.
    Marsh N.
    Gordon L.
    Wallis M.
    Scuffham P.A.
    Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2014, 12 (1) : 51 - 58
  • [9] Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters
    Webster, Joan
    Osborne, Sonya
    Rickard, Claire M.
    Marsh, Nicole
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (01):
  • [10] Clinically-indicated replacement versus routine replacement of peripheral venous catheters
    Webster, Joan
    Osborne, Sonya
    Rickard, Claire M.
    New, Karen
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (04):