The Effect of Altered Auditory Feedback of Voice Focus on Nasalance Scores

被引:0
|
作者
Bressmann, Tim [1 ]
Misic, Mia Sara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Speech Language Pathol, 160-500 Univ Ave, Toronto, ON M5G 1V7, Canada
关键词
ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS; ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS; NASALITY; RESONANCE; SPEECH MOTOR COORDINATION; SPEECH PRODUCTION; VELOPHARYNGEAL FUNCTION; VOICE; VELOPHARYNGEAL CLOSURE FORCE; BALANCE; HYPERNASALITY; COMPENSATION; JUDGMENTS; SPEAKERS; VOWELS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Voice focus is a term that describes the perceived brightness or throatiness of the voice. In previous research, forward voice focus resulted in higher and backward focus in lower nasalance scores. This study explored whether electronically altered auditory voice focus feedback prompts speakers to adjust their voice focus and whether this affects nasalance scores. Twenty females with normal speech wore a Nasometer headset and headphones. They repeated a single sentence with oral and nasal sounds. Their auditory feedback was gradually changed with a voice transformer, so the speakers heard themselves with a more forward or backward voice focus, respectively. Oral-nasal balance was quantified as a nasalance score. Analysis of variance results of the averaged first and second vowel formants of three repetitions of the stimulus at the different baselines and maximum forward and maximum backward voice focus feedback conditions demonstrated significant effects of the voice shift condition. Analysis of variance for the nasalance scores demonstrated a significant effect of feedback condition. From the initial mean nasalance scores of 29.5%, the mean nasalance dropped to 27.5% in the backward and to 25.7% in the forward focus feedback condition. The altered auditory feedback induced voice focus adjustments that resulted in lower nasalance scores. The use of altered auditory feedback in speech therapy of hypernasality needs to be investigated in future research.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate effects of voice focus adjustments on hypernasal speakers' nasalance scores
    Santoni, Charlene
    Thaut, Michael
    Bressmann, Tim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2020, 135
  • [2] The effect of vowels on nasalance scores
    Lewis, KE
    Watterson, T
    Quint, T
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2000, 37 (06): : 584 - 589
  • [3] Effect of stimulus length on nasalance scores
    Watterson, T
    Lewis, KE
    Foley-Homan, N
    CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 1999, 36 (03): : 243 - 247
  • [4] The Potential Effect of Forbrain as an Altered Auditory Feedback Device
    Escera, Carles
    Lopez-Caballero, Fran
    Gorina-Careta, Natalia
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 61 (04): : 801 - 810
  • [5] Effect of Septoplasty On Voice Performance: Nasalance and Acoustic Study
    Hernandez-Garcia, Estefania
    Moro-Velazquez, Laureano
    Gonzalez-Herranz, Ramon
    Lara, Antonio
    Godino-Llorente, Juan Ignacio
    Plaza, Guillermo
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 30 (04) : 1000 - 1003
  • [6] Effect of monaural and binaural altered auditory feedback on stuttering frequency
    Stuart, A
    Kalinowski, J
    Rastatter, MP
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 101 (06): : 3806 - 3809
  • [7] AUDITORY-FEEDBACK IN REGULATION OF VOICE
    SIEGEL, GM
    PICK, HL
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1974, 56 (05): : 1618 - 1624
  • [8] Voice responses to changes in pitch of voice or tone auditory feedback
    Sivasankar, M
    Bauer, JJ
    Babu, T
    Larson, CR
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 117 (02): : 850 - 857
  • [9] Altered sensory feedbacks in pianist's dystonia: the altered auditory feedback paradigm and the glove effect
    Cheng, Felicia P. -H.
    Grossbach, Michael
    Altenmueller, Eckart O.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 7
  • [10] THE EFFECT OF GENDER UPON NASALANCE SCORES AMONG NORMAL ADULT SPEAKERS
    LITZAW, LL
    DALSTON, RM
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 1992, 25 (01) : 55 - 64