TREATMENT OF URETERAL CATHETER RELATED SYMPTOMS; MIRABEGRON VERSUS TAMSULOSIN/SOLIFENACIN COMBINATION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

被引:0
|
作者
Sahin, Aytac [1 ]
Yildirim, Caglar [1 ]
Yuksel, Ozgur H. [1 ]
Urkmez, Ahmet [2 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Sci Univ, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Hlth Sci Univ, Haydarpasa Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA | 2020年 / 73卷 / 01期
关键词
Mirabegron; Ureteral catheter related symptoms; Tamsulosin; Solifenacin; DOUBLE-J STENT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; URINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMS; DOUBLE-BLIND; SOLIFENACIN; TAMSULOSIN; RECEPTORS; IMPACT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES: The double-J (DJ) stents are commonly used to relieve the ureteral obstruction. Besides several known benefits, some of the patients encounter stent-related morbidities with considerable effects on the quality of life, general health situation, sexual matters, and daily work performance. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of tamsulosin/solifenacin combination and mirabegron in reducing DJ stent-related symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 patients with 28cm 4.7fr DJ catheter inserted due to ureteral obstruction were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups of 40 each; group one received only oral hydration for six weeks; group two received 0.4 mg tamsulosin/10 mg solifenacin, and group three received 50 mg mirabegron. Preoperative and after 6 weeks, the VAPS, OAB-q index, and IPSSs forms were filled. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 41.60 +/- 12.34 years. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of preoperative and postoperative VAPS values (p>0.05). There was a significant difference in postop IPSSs values (p:0.001). It was higher in the hydration group than tamsulosin/solifenacin and mirabegron groups. Postoperative IPSS value of the hydration group was 21.78 +/- 2.54 while the tamsulosin/solifenacin and mirabegron groups were 15.6 +/- 4.37 and 13.65 +/- 4.97, respectively. The use of mirabegron and tamsulosin/solifenacin combination alleviates the LUTSs related with DJ stent. There was also a significant difference between groups in terms of postoperative OAB-q values (p:0.001). Postoperative OAB-q values in the tamsulosin/solifenacin group were significantly higher than the mirabegron group. Postoperative OAB-q value of the hydration group was 29.95 +/- 5.21, while the tamsulosin/solifenacin and mirabegron groups were 23.68 +/- 4.07 and 18.15 +/- 4.1, respectively. Our results also showed that, as a beta-3 adrenergic receptor agonist, mirabegron can improve the OAB-q scores. CONCLUSION: Tamsulosin and solifenacin combination is a significantly good treatment option for reducing CUTS associated with DJ stents. Mirabegron single therapy showed good results in treating LUTS and better results in treating OAB symptoms related with DJ stents than other therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 59
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized controlled trial study on effectiveness between tadalafil versus combination mirabegron and solifenacin on treatment of ureteral stent-related symptoms
    Ciayadi, Tjia Adynata
    Palinrungi, Muhammad Asykar
    Kholis, Khoirul
    Hendarto, Joko
    Syahrir, Syakri
    Syarif, Syarif
    Azis, Abdul
    PAN AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 46
  • [2] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING ALPHA BLOCKER (TAMSULOSIN) AND ANTICHOLINERGIC (SOLIFENACIN) IN TREATMENT OF URETERAL STENT RELATED SYMPTOMS
    EL-Nahas, Ahmed
    Tharwat, Mohamed
    Elsaadany, Mohamed
    Mosbah, Ahmed
    Gaballah, Mohamed
    Kawauchi, Akihiro
    Miura, Katsuyuki
    Ueshima, Hirotsugu
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E302 - E302
  • [3] Tamsulosin, Solifenacin, and Their Combination for the Treatment of Stent-Related Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Dellis, Athanasios E.
    Papatsoris, Athanasios G.
    Keeley, Francis X., Jr.
    Bamias, Aristotelis
    Deliveliotis, Charalambos
    Skolarikos, Andreas A.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) : 100 - 109
  • [4] A randomized controlled trial comparing alpha blocker (tamsulosin) and anticholinergic (solifenacin) in treatment of ureteral stent-related symptoms
    EL-Nahas, Ahmed R.
    Tharwat, Mohamed
    Elsaadany, Mohamed
    Mosbah, Ahmed
    Gaballah, Mohamed A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (07) : 963 - 968
  • [5] A randomized controlled trial comparing alpha blocker (tamsulosin) and anticholinergic (solifenacin) in treatment of ureteral stent-related symptoms
    Ahmed R. EL-Nahas
    Mohamed Tharwat
    Mohamed Elsaadany
    Ahmed Mosbah
    Mohamed A. Gaballah
    World Journal of Urology, 2016, 34 : 963 - 968
  • [6] COMPARISON OF MIRABEGRON, SOLIFENACIN AND TAMSULOSIN FOR STENT RELATED SYMPTOMS: A DOUBLE BLINDED RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL
    Chandna, Abhishek
    Kumar, Santosh
    Mete, Uttam Kumar
    Devana, Sudheer Kumar
    Sharma, Aditya Prakash
    Malhotra, Samir
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 203 : E1020 - E1020
  • [7] TAMSULOSIN, SOLIFENACIN, AND THEIR COMBINATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF STENT-RELATED SYMPTOMS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED STUDY.
    Zhou, Peng
    Zhu, Jingyu
    Li, Ruipeng
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E224 - E224
  • [8] EFFECTS OF TAMSULOSIN, SOLIFENACIN MONOTHERAPY AND COMBINATION THERAPY FOR THE RELIEF OF URETERAL STENT-RELATED SYMPTOMS: AN OPEN-LABEL RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Park, Jinsung
    You, Changhee
    Shin, Dong Wook
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 193 (04): : E506 - E507
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial comparing tadalafil/solifenacin versus tamsulosin/solifenacin combination for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with overactive bladder
    Hegazy, M.
    Ashour, R.
    Ramez, M.
    Wadie, B. S.
    Nabeeh, A.
    El-Hefnawy, A. S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S1805 - S1806
  • [10] Comparison of stent related symptoms in patients taking mirabegron, solifenacin, or tamsulosin: A double blinded randomized clinical trial
    Chandna, Abhishek
    Kumar, Santosh
    Parmar, Kalpesh M.
    Sharma, Aditya P.
    Devana, Sudheer K.
    Mete, Uttam K.
    Singh, Shrawan K.
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2022, 89 (04) : 589 - 596