University-industry collaboration: The impact of postdoctoral workstations on labor investment efficiency

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Yiding [1 ]
Yi, Kefu [2 ]
Huang, Guanhua [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, Business Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hohhot, Peoples R China
[3] Agr Dev Bank China, Branch Jiangxi, Nanchang, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
university-industry collaboration; postdoctoral workstation; labor investment efficiency; difference-in-differences; optimal labor level; CAPITAL-SKILL COMPLEMENTARITY; INCENTIVES; WORK;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955935
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper investigates whether managers use knowledge transferred from university-industry collaboration when making investment decisions on labor. To establish causality, we use a difference-in-difference method based on the staggered establishment of postdoctoral workstations in Chinese firms. We find that postdoctoral workstations enable managers to improve labor investment efficiency and thus help mitigate over- and under-investment problems in tabor, and the higher the operational quality of the workstation, the more significant the increase in investment efficiency. This finding is robust to utilizing the event study approach, placebo test, propensity score matching, instrumental variable, and entropy balancing. Brain gain and knowledge transfer effects between universities and industries are two plausible mechanisms. Furthermore, the main effect is more pronounced for firms located closer to prestigious universities, firms are non-state-owned enterprises, human-capital-intensive, have political connections, and without national fellows' lead. Our findings suggest that brain gain in firms does not merely increase or reduce tabor investments Per se, but rather inspires managers to maintain optimal tabor levels through knowledge transfer processes.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Complementarity Investment in University-Industry Collaboration
    Jeffrey C. Sun
    Heather A. Turner
    Innovative Higher Education, 2023, 48 : 539 - 556
  • [2] The Complementarity Investment in University-Industry Collaboration
    Sun, Jeffrey C.
    Turner, Heather A.
    INNOVATIVE HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 48 (03) : 539 - 556
  • [3] University-industry collaboration
    Miller, RC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 99 : S90 - S92
  • [4] The impact of university-industry collaboration networks on innovation in nanobiopharmaceuticals
    Guan, Jiancheng
    Zhao, Qingjun
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2013, 80 (07) : 1271 - 1286
  • [5] Perils of university-industry collaboration
    Krimsky, S
    ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 16 (01) : 14 - 15
  • [6] UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY COLLABORATION - HUGE
    MLOT, C
    SCIENCE, 1994, 263 (5151) : 1227 - 1227
  • [7] UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY RESEARCH COLLABORATION
    CHU, WK
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 1983, 30 (02) : 1357 - 1358
  • [8] University-Industry Collaboration in Armenia
    Qin, Yuan-jian
    Mkhitaryan, Davit
    Bhuiyan, Miraj Ahmed
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED MECHANICS AND MECHANICAL AUTOMATION (AMMA 2017), 2017, : 411 - 415
  • [9] University-Industry Research Collaboration
    Karmakar, Nemai Chandra
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND COMPUTER ENGINEERING (ICECE), 2014, : 840 - 843
  • [10] When Collaboration Bridges Institutions: The Impact of University-Industry Collaboration on Academic Productivity
    Bikard, Michael
    Vakili, Keyvan
    Teodoridis, Florenta
    ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (02) : 426 - 445