Genetically-informed population models improve climate change vulnerability assessments

被引:4
|
作者
Byer, Nathan W. [1 ,2 ]
Reid, Brendan N. [3 ]
Peery, M. Z. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ WI Madison, Dept Forestry & Wildlife Ecol, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Russell Labs, Room A230A,1630 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, WK Kellogg Biol Stn, Corners, MI 49060 USA
关键词
Blanding's turtle; Climate change; Landscape genetics; Land use change; Metapopulation viability; Resistance surfaces; LAND-USE CHANGE; SPECIES EXTINCTIONS; LANDSCAPE GENETICS; LIFE-HISTORY; DISPERSAL; IMPACTS; FUTURE; SHIFTS; CONNECTIVITY; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-020-01011-x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Climate change will cause species extinctions that will be exacerbated by human-caused landscape changes, preventing species from tracking shifting climatic niches. Although incorporating functional connectivity into prospective population models has proven challenging, the field of landscape genetics provides underutilized tools for characterizing functional connectivity. Objectives The aim of this study was to explore how genetically-derived representations of dispersal affect assessments of environmental change impacts using a spatially-explicit population modelling approach. We illustrated the utility of this approach to test hypotheses related to the effects of dispersal representation and environmental change for the IUCN-threatened Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii). Methods We integrated existing demographic and genetic datasets into a spatially-explicit metapopulation modelling framework. We ran several sets of simulations with varying dispersal representations (distance-based, landscape resistance-based with either static or changing land cover) to explore how landscape genetic estimates of connectivity impact estimates of extinction risk. Results Models incorporating land cover-based dispersal resulted in lower patch occupancy than simulations where dispersal was only a function of interpatch distance. Furthermore, both climate change-induced declines in habitat suitability and land use change-induced declines in connectivity reduced abundance and patch occupancy. Conclusions Incorporating landscape genetics into population models revealed that choices involved in dispersal representation alter both extinction risk and path occupancy, often altering the distribution of extant patches by the end of simulations. As technological advances continue to increase access to landscape genetic datasets, we suggest that researchers carefully consider how genetic resources can be used to improve climate vulnerability assessments.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1228
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Genetically-informed population models improve climate change vulnerability assessments
    Nathan W. Byer
    Brendan N. Reid
    M. Z. Peery
    Landscape Ecology, 2020, 35 : 1215 - 1228
  • [2] Genetically informed ecological niche models improve climate change predictions
    Ikeda, Dana H.
    Max, Tamara L.
    Allan, Gerard J.
    Lau, Matthew K.
    Shuster, Stephen M.
    Whitham, Thomas G.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2017, 23 (01) : 164 - 176
  • [3] Climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessments
    Fabrice Renaud
    Rosa Perez
    Sustainability Science, 2010, 5 : 155 - 157
  • [4] Climate change vulnerability and adaptation assessments
    Renaud, Fabrice
    Perez, Rosa
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2010, 5 (02) : 155 - 157
  • [5] A genetically-informed Population Viability Analysis reveals conservation priorities for an isolated population of Hyla arborea
    Auffarth, Jana
    Krug, Astrid
    Proehl, Heike
    Jehle, Robert
    SALAMANDRA, 2017, 53 (02): : 171 - 182
  • [6] A blind spot in climate change vulnerability assessments
    Stacy L. Small-Lorenz
    Leah A. Culp
    T. Brandt Ryder
    Tom C. Will
    Peter P. Marra
    Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3 : 91 - 93
  • [7] Comparison of Climate Change Vulnerability Assessments for Wildlife
    Lankford, Amber J.
    Svancara, Leona K.
    Lawler, Joshua J.
    Vierling, Kerri
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2014, 38 (02): : 386 - 394
  • [8] A blind spot in climate change vulnerability assessments
    Small-Lorenz, Stacy L.
    Culp, Leah A.
    Ryder, T. Brandt
    Will, Tom C.
    Marra, Peter P.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (02) : 91 - 93
  • [9] Life on the edge: A new toolbox for population-level climate change vulnerability assessments
    Barratt, Christopher D.
    Onstein, Renske E.
    Pinsky, Malin L.
    Steinfartz, Sebastian
    Kuehl, Hjalmar S.
    Forester, Brenna R.
    Razgour, Orly
    METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 15 (11): : 2038 - 2058
  • [10] Combining landscape variables and species traits can improve the utility of climate change vulnerability assessments
    Nadeau, Christopher P.
    Fuller, Angela K.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2016, 202 : 30 - 38