Effect of sensitivity analysis on parameter optimization: Case study based on streamflow simulations using the SWAT model in China

被引:43
|
作者
Li, Mei [1 ]
Di, Zhenhua [1 ]
Duan, Qingyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Hohai Univ, Coll Hydrol & Water Resources, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Sensitivity analysis; Parameter optimization; Streamflow simulation; SWAT model; NONPOINT-SOURCE POLLUTION; LAND-USE CHANGE; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; HYDROLOGIC-MODELS; WATER-QUALITY; RIVER CATCHMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RUNOFF; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126896
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Parameter optimization is an essential step in hydrological simulations, especially for solving practical problems. However, parameter optimization is usually intractable for complex models with a large number of parameters. In this study, a parameter optimization system based on Sensitive Parameter Combinations (SPCs) was developed, which comprised four parameter sensitivity analysis (SA) methods and a sensitive parameter optimization method. In particular, parameter SA was used to screen out the relatively sensitive parameters with significant impacts on the model output, and instead of using All Parameter Combinations (APCs), the SPCs were optimized with a global optimization method. This system was applied to the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for daily streamflow simulation and monthly evaluation in four watersheds of China. The results showed that no more than 10 sensitive parameters were identified from 27 adjustable parameters for each watershed. In particular, four parameters (CN2, SOL_K, ALPHA_BNK, and SLSUBBSN) were relatively sensitive in all watersheds. Compared with optimizing APCs, despite the number of parameters was reduced by almost 2/3 in the optimization of SPCs, the accuracy was still very close (the maximum Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient (NSE) difference was 0.024 and the minimum difference was 0.002) and the optimization speed was doubled. In the comparison of monthly streamflow optimization, the SPCs were in good agreement with the APCs and had an obvious improvement for the default simulation. The NSE values of the SPCs optimization were greater than 0.88 during the calibration period in all watersheds and greater than 0.83 during the validation period in three watersheds. These findings indicate that optimizing the sensitivity parameters can greatly reduce the computational costs of SWAT streamflow simulations while ensuring their accuracy.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity Analysis-Based Automatic Parameter Calibration of the VIC Model for Streamflow Simulations Over China
    Gou, Jiaojiao
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Duan, Qingyun
    Tang, Qiuhong
    Di, Zhenhua
    Liao, Weihong
    Wu, Jingwen
    Zhou, Rui
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2020, 56 (01)
  • [2] Parameter sensitivity analysis of SWAT model for streamflow simulation with multisource precipitation datasets
    Guo, Jing
    Su, Xiaoling
    HYDROLOGY RESEARCH, 2019, 50 (03): : 861 - 877
  • [3] Effect of spatial resolution of climatological data on streamflow simulations using the SWAT : A case study
    Mohapatra, Priyanka
    Das, Dwarika Mohan
    Sahoo, Bharat Chandra
    Padhiary, Jagadish
    Paul, Jagadish Chandra
    Raul, Sanjay Kumar
    Panda, Chinmaya
    MAUSAM, 2023, 74 (04): : 943 - 950
  • [4] Sensitivity analysis of SWAT model to the spatial rainfall distribution and watershed subdivision in streamflow simulations in the Mediterranean context: a case study in the Joumine watershed. Tunisia.
    Aouissi, Jalel
    Benabdallah, Sihem
    Chabaane, Zohra Lili
    Cudennec, Christophe
    2013 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELING, SIMULATION AND APPLIED OPTIMIZATION (ICMSAO), 2013,
  • [5] Assessing model parameters sensitivity and uncertainty of streamflow, sediment, and nutrient transport using SWAT
    Dakhlalla A.O.
    Parajuli P.B.
    Information Processing in Agriculture, 2019, 6 (01) : 61 - 72
  • [6] Analysis of Streamflow Response to Changing Climate Conditions Using SWAT Model
    Oo, Han Thi
    Zin, Win Win
    Kyi, Cho Cho Thin
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2020, 6 (02): : 194 - 209
  • [7] Assessment of climate change impacts on streamflow through hydrological model using SWAT model: a case study of Afghanistan
    Aawar, Taha
    Khare, Deepak
    MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6 (03) : 1427 - 1437
  • [8] Assessment of climate change impacts on streamflow through hydrological model using SWAT model: a case study of Afghanistan
    Taha Aawar
    Deepak Khare
    Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2020, 6 : 1427 - 1437
  • [9] Parameter Uncertainty Analysis for Streamflow Simulation Using SWAT Model in Nashe Watershed, Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
    Leta, Megersa Kebede
    Ebsa, Dessalegn Geleta
    Regasa, Motuma Shiferaw
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOIL SCIENCE, 2022, 2022
  • [10] Comprehensive evaluation of parameter importance and optimization based on the integrated sensitivity analysis system: A case study of the BTOP model in the upper Min River Basin, China
    Liu, Lingxue
    Ao, Tianqi
    Zhou, Li
    Takeuchi, Kuniyoshi
    Gusyev, Maksym
    Zhang, Xing
    Wang, Wenzhang
    Ren, Yufeng
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2022, 610