Psychometric properties of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain

被引:502
|
作者
Cleland, Joshua A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Childs, John A. [4 ]
Whitman, Julie M. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Franklin Pierce Coll, Phys Therapy Program, Concord, NH 03301 USA
[2] Concord Hosp, Rehabil Serv, Concord, NH USA
[3] Regis Univ, Manual Therapy Fellowship Program, Denver, CO USA
[4] USA Baylor Univ, Doctoral Program Phys Therapy, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Regis Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Denver, CO USA
来源
关键词
neck; neck pain; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.126
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine the psychometric properties including test-retest reliability, construct validity, and minimum levels of detectable and clinically important change for the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain in a cohort of patients with neck pain. Design: Single-group repeated-measures design. Setting: Outpatient physical therapy (PT) clinics. Participants: Patients (N=137) presenting to PT with a primary report of neck pain. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: All patients completed the NDI and the NRS at the baseline examination and at a follow-up. At the time of the follow-up, all patients also completed the global rating of change, which was used to dichotomize patients as improved or stable. Baseline and follow-up scores were used to determine the test-retest reliability, construct validity, and minimal levels of detectable and clinically important change for both the NDI and NRS. Results: Test-retest reliability was calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (NDI ICC=.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], .25-67; NRS ICC=.76; 95% CI, .51-87). The area under the curve was .83 (95% Cl, .75-90) for the NDI score and .85 (95% Cl, .78-.93) for the NRS score for determining between stable and improved patients. Thresholds for the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the NDI were 19-percentage points and 1.3 for the NRS. Conclusions: Both the NDI and NRS exhibit fair to moderate test-retest reliability in patients with mechanical neck pain. Both instruments also showed adequate responsiveness in this patient population. However, the MCID required to be certain that the change in scores has surpassed a level that could be contributed to measurement error for the NDI was twice that which has previously been reported. Therefore the ongoing analyses of the properties of the NDI in a patient population with neck pain are warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Psychometric properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and Neck Disability Index in patients with cervicogenic headache
    Young, Ian A.
    Dunning, James
    Butts, Raymond
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    Fernandez-de-las-Penas, Cesar
    CEPHALALGIA, 2019, 39 (01) : 44 - 51
  • [2] Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness of the neck disability index and numeric pain rating scale in patients with mechanical neck pain without upper extremity symptoms
    Young, Ian A.
    Dunning, James
    Butts, Raymond
    Mourad, Firas
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 35 (12) : 1328 - 1335
  • [3] Validation of Thai Versions of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale in Patients With Neck Pain
    Uthaikhup, Sureeporn
    Paungmali, Aatit
    Pirunsan, Ubon
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (21) : E1415 - E1421
  • [4] A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Psychometric Properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for Use in People With Neck Pain
    Modarresi, Shirin
    Lukacs, Michael J.
    Ghodrati, Maryam
    Salim, Shahan
    MacDermid, Joy C.
    Walton, David M.
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2022, 38 (02): : 132 - 148
  • [5] Validation of the Nepali versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for Neck Pain
    Shrestha, Dipak
    Shrestha, Rohit
    Grotle, Margreth
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    Solberg, Tore K.
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (05) : E325 - E332
  • [6] Minimal clinically important change of the neck disability index and the numerical rating scale for patients with neck pain
    Pool, Jan J. M.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    Hoving, Jan L.
    Bouter, Lex M.
    de Vet, Henrica C. W.
    SPINE, 2007, 32 (26) : 3047 - 3051
  • [7] Psychometric properties of a German version of the neck pain and disability scale
    Martin Scherer
    Eva Blozik
    Wolfgang Himmel
    Daria Laptinskaya
    Michael M. Kochen
    Christoph Herrmann-Lingen
    European Spine Journal, 2008, 17 : 922 - 929
  • [8] Psychometric properties of a German version of the neck pain and disability scale
    Scherer, Martin
    Blozik, Eva
    Himmel, Wolfgang
    Laptinskaya, Daria
    Kochen, Michael M.
    Herrmann-Lingen, Christoph
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (07) : 922 - 929
  • [9] Psychometric properties of the neck disability index amongst patients with chronic neck pain using item response theory
    Saltychev, Mikhail
    Mattie, Ryan
    McCormick, Zachary
    Laimi, Katri
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2018, 40 (18) : 2116 - 2121
  • [10] Estimating EQ-5D values from the Neck Disability Index and numeric rating scales for neck and arm pain
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    Bratcher, Kelly R.
    Das, Nandita
    Nienhuis, Jacob B.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (03) : 394 - 399