Enhanced extinction of visible radiation due to hydrated aerosols in mist and fog

被引:22
|
作者
Elias, T. [1 ]
Dupont, J-C [2 ]
Hammer, E. [3 ]
Hoyle, C. R. [3 ]
Haeffelin, M. [2 ]
Burnet, F. [4 ]
Jolivet, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Euratechnologies, HYGEOS, F-59000 Lille, France
[2] Inst Pierre Simon Laplace, F-91128 Palaiseau, France
[3] Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Atmospher Chem, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[4] Ctr Natl Rech Meteorol, F-31057 Toulouse, France
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
SIZE; PARAMETERIZATION; CLOUDS; FIELD; HAZE; PREDICTION; VISIBILITY; GROWTH;
D O I
10.5194/acp-15-6605-2015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The study assesses the contribution of aerosols to the extinction of visible radiation in the mist-fog-mist cycle. Relative humidity is large in the mist-fog-mist cycle, and aerosols most efficient in interacting with visible radiation are hydrated and compose the accumulation mode. Measurements of the microphysical and optical properties of these hydrated aerosols with diameters larger than 0.4 mu m were carried out near Paris, during November 2011, under ambient conditions. Eleven mist-fog-mist cycles were observed, with a cumulated fog duration of 96 h, and a cumulated mist-fog-mist cycle duration of 240 h. In mist, aerosols grew by taking up water at relative humidities larger than 93%, causing a visibility decrease below 5 km. While visibility decreased down from 5 to a few kilometres, the mean size of the hydrated aerosols increased, and their number concentration (N-ha) increased from approximately 160 to approximately 600 cm(-3). When fog formed, droplets became the strongest contributors to visible radiation extinction, and liquid water content (LWC) increased beyond 7 mg m(-3). Hydrated aerosols of the accumulation mode co-existed with droplets, as interstitial non-activated aerosols. Their size continued to increase, and some aerosols achieved diameters larger than 2.5 mu m. The mean transition diameter between the aerosol accumulation mode and the small droplet mode was 4.0 +/- 1.1 mu m. N-ha also increased on average by 60 % after fog formation. Consequently, the mean contribution to extinction in fog was 20 +/- 15% from hydrated aerosols smaller than 2.5 mu m and 6 +/- 7% from larger aerosols. The standard deviation was large because of the large variability of N-ha in fog, which could be smaller than in mist or 3 times larger. The particle extinction coefficient in fog can be computed as the sum of a droplet component and an aerosol component, which can be approximated by 3.5 N-ha (N-ha in cm(-3) and particle extinction coefficient in Mm(-1). We observed an influence of the main formation process on N-ha, but not on the contribution to fog extinction by aerosols. Indeed, in fogs formed by stratus lowering (STL), the mean N-ha was 360 +/- 140 cm(-3), close to the value observed in mist, while in fogs formed by nocturnal radiative cooling (RAD) under cloud-free sky, the mean N-ha was 600 +/- 350 cm(-3). But because visibility (extinction) in fog was also lower (larger) in RAD than in STL fogs, the contribution by aerosols to extinction depended little on the fog formation process. Similarly, the proportion of hydrated aerosols over all aerosols (dry and hydrated) did not depend on the fog formation process. Measurements showed that visibility in RAD fogs was smaller than in STL fogs due to three factors: (1) LWC was larger in RAD than in STL fogs, (2) droplets were smaller, (3) hydrated aerosols composing the accumulation mode were more numerous.
引用
收藏
页码:6605 / 6623
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Particulate contribution to extinction of visible radiation: Pollution, haze, and fog
    Elias, Thierry
    Haeffelin, Martial
    Drobinski, Philippe
    Gomes, Laurent
    Rangognio, Jerome
    Bergot, Thierry
    Chazette, Patrick
    Raut, Jean-Christophe
    Colomb, Michele
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2009, 92 (04) : 443 - 454
  • [2] EXTINCTION OF IR WAVELENGTHS BY AEROSOLS IN COASTAL FOG
    HUGHES, HG
    JENSEN, DR
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1978, 17 (14): : 2138 - 2140
  • [3] CORRELATION BETWEEN THE INFRARED AND VISIBLE EXTINCTION COEFFICIENTS OF FOG
    GIMMESTAD, GG
    WINCHESTER, LW
    CHOI, WK
    LEE, SM
    OPTICS LETTERS, 1982, 7 (10) : 471 - 473
  • [4] EXTINCTION AND LIQUID WATER-CONTENT OF FOG AT VISIBLE WAVELENGTHS
    JENNINGS, SG
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1983, 22 (17) : 2514 - 2515
  • [5] On the roles of circulation and aerosols in the decline of mist and dense fog in Europe over the last 30 years
    van Oldenborgh, G. J.
    Yiou, P.
    Vautard, R.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (10) : 4597 - 4609
  • [6] MEASURED INFRARED AND VISIBLE ATMOSPHERIC EXTINCTION COEFFICIENTS OF SNOW, RAIN, AND FOG
    PARKS, PN
    CHOI, WK
    GIMMESTAD, GG
    LEE, SM
    WINCHESTER, LW
    JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1980, 70 (12) : 1561 - 1561
  • [7] EXTINCTION OF CO2-LASER RADIATION BY FOG AND RAIN
    CHIMELIS, V
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1982, 21 (18) : 3367 - 3372
  • [8] VERTICAL STRUCTURE IN ATMOSPHERIC FOG AND HAZE AND ITS EFFECTS ON VISIBLE AND INFRARED EXTINCTION
    PINNICK, RG
    HOIHJELLE, DL
    FERNANDEZ, G
    STENMARK, EB
    LINDBERG, JD
    HOIDALE, GB
    JENNINGS, SG
    JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 1978, 35 (10) : 2020 - 2032
  • [9] Modeling the Contribution of Aerosols to Fog Evolution through Their Influence on Solar Radiation
    Al Asmar, Lea
    Musson-Genon, Luc
    Dupont, Eric
    Ferrand, Martin
    Sartelet, Karine
    CLIMATE, 2022, 10 (05)
  • [10] Scavenging of Black Carbon Aerosols by Radiation Fog in Urban Central China
    Zhang, Xiaolin
    Zhou, Yu
    Wang, Yuanzhi
    Huang, Aojie
    Gao, Chang
    He, Siqi
    Mao, Mao
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (02)