Evaluating the aptitude of global climate models from CMIP5 and CMIP6 in capturing the historical observations of monsoon rainfall over Sudan from 1946 to 2005

被引:7
|
作者
Hamadalnel, Monzer [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Zhiwei [1 ]
Lu, Rui [1 ]
Almazroui, Mansour [3 ,4 ]
Shahid, Shamsuddin [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Forecast & Evaluat Meteoro, Joint Int Res Lab Climate & Environm Change, Key Lab Meteorol Disaster,Minist Educ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Omdurman Islamic Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Astron & Meteorol, Omdurman, Sudan
[3] King Abdulaziz Univ, Dept Meteorol, Ctr Excellence Climate Change Res, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[4] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Climat Res Unit, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[5] Univ Teknol Malaysia TUM, Fac Engn, Sch Civil Engn, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
evaluation; global climate model; monsoon; precipitation; Sudan; EARTH SYSTEM MODEL; SEA-SURFACE TEMPERATURE; COUPLED MODEL; MEAN STATE; VARIABILITY; PRECIPITATION; PERFORMANCE; OCEAN;
D O I
10.1002/joc.7387
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Sudan is one of the most vulnerable countries to climate change in the African Sahel region. Given the urgent need to understand the potential behaviour of the future climate, this study assessed the skill of 32 global climate models (GCMs) from the fifth (CMIP5) and the sixth (CMIP6) phases of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) in simulating summer monsoon precipitation over Sudan for the period 1946-2005. The models were ranked based on the Skills Score, estimated using three statistical metrics, correlation coefficient, index of agreement, and normalized root mean square error. The best performing models and their ensembles were used for long-term trend quantification, empirical orthogonal function (EOF) analysis, and assessment of precipitation associations with atmospheric circulation. GISS-E2-H, IPSL-CM5A-MR, and MPI-ESM-LR of CMIP5 and BCC-CSM2-MR, INM-CM4-8, and MPI-ESM1-2-LR of CMIP6 showed the best performance in Sudan. Instead of August's unimodal peak rainfall, the GCMs, especially the CMIP5 GCMs, showed an unrealistic rainfall peak in May and a shift of the August rainfall peak to September. Only the CMIP6 multi-model ensemble reliably reproduced the unimodal rainfall property. All models of both phases failed to reconstruct the dominant mode of monsoon precipitation as determined using EOF analysis, particularly in the country's southern parts. The models also failed to reproduce the long-term rainfall trends in different climate zones. Only MPI-ESM-LR (CMIP5) and MPI-ESM1-2-LR (CMIP6) were successful in simulating monsoon rainfall associations with sea surface temperature, El Nino-Southern Oscillation teleconnection, and winds components at 850 hPa.
引用
收藏
页码:2717 / 2738
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating Diurnal Rainfall Signal Performance from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Lee, Yu-Chi
    Wang, Yi-Chi
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (18) : 7607 - 7623
  • [2] On the simulation of northeast monsoon rainfall over southern peninsular India in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    P. P. Sreekala
    C. A. Babu
    S. Vijaya Bhaskara Rao
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 150 : 969 - 986
  • [3] On the simulation of northeast monsoon rainfall over southern peninsular India in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Sreekala, P. P.
    Babu, C. A.
    Rao, S. Vijaya Bhaskara
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 150 (3-4) : 969 - 986
  • [4] Added value of CMIP6 over CMIP5 models in simulating Indian summer monsoon rainfall
    Gusain, A.
    Ghosh, S.
    Karmakar, S.
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2020, 232
  • [5] An evaluation of CMIP5 and CMIP6 climate models in simulating summer rainfall in the Southeast Asian monsoon domain
    Khadka, Dibesh
    Babel, Mukand S.
    Abatan, Abayomi A.
    Collins, Matthew
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 42 (02) : 1181 - 1202
  • [6] Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models in Simulating Climate over China and the East Asian Monsoon
    Dabang Jiang
    Dan Hu
    Zhiping Tian
    Xianmei Lang
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2020, 37 : 1102 - 1118
  • [7] Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models in Simulating Climate over China and the East Asian Monsoon
    Dabang JIANG
    Dan HU
    Zhiping TIAN
    Xianmei LANG
    AdvancesinAtmosphericSciences, 2020, 37 (10) : 1102 - 1134
  • [8] Differences between CMIP6 and CMIP5 Models in Simulating Climate over China and the East Asian Monsoon
    Jiang, Dabang
    Hu, Dan
    Tian, Zhiping
    Lang, Xianmei
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 37 (10) : 1102 - 1118
  • [9] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 147 (1-2) : 535 - 548
  • [10] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Mohammed Sanusi Shiru
    Eun-Sung Chung
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Xiao-jun Wang
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 147 : 535 - 548