Reward deficits in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia include insensitivity to negative stimuli

被引:33
|
作者
Perry, David C. [1 ]
Datta, Samir [1 ]
Sturm, Virginia E. [1 ]
Wood, Kristie A. [1 ]
Zakrzewski, Jessica [1 ]
Seeley, William W. [1 ]
Miller, Bruce L. [1 ]
Kramer, Joel H. [1 ]
Rosen, Howard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Neurol, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
frontotemporal dementia; reward; psychophysiology; ODOR IDENTIFICATION; DECISION-MAKING; HUMAN AMYGDALA; NEURAL REPRESENTATIONS; LOBAR DEGENERATION; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; FRONTAL VARIANT; ACTIVATION; INTENSITY; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awx259
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
During reward processing individuals weigh positive and negative features of a stimulus to determine whether they will pursue or avoid it. Though patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia display changes in their pursuit of rewards, such as food, alcohol, money, and sex, the basis for these shifts is not clearly established. In particular, it is unknown whether patients' behaviour results from excessive focus on rewards, insensitivity to punishment, or to dysfunction in a particular stage of reward processing, such as anticipation, consumption, or action selection. Our goal was to determine the nature of the reward deficit in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and its underlying anatomy. We devised a series of tasks involving pleasant, unpleasant, and neutral olfactory stimuli, designed to separate distinct phases of reward processing. In a group of 25 patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and 21 control subjects, diagnosis by valence interactions revealed that patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia rated unpleasant odours as less aversive than did controls and displayed lower skin conductance responses when anticipating an upcoming aversive odour. Subjective pleasantness ratings and skin conductance responses did not differ between behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and controls for pleasant or neutral smells. In a task designed to measure the effort subjects would expend to smell or avoid smelling a stimulus, patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia were less motivated, and therefore less successful than control subjects, at avoiding what they preferred not to smell, but had equivalent success at obtaining stimuli they found rewarding. Voxel-based morphometry of patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia revealed that the inability to subjectively differentiate the valence of pleasant and unpleasant odours correlated with atrophy in right ventral mid-insula and right amygdala. High pleasantness ratings of unpleasant stimuli correlated with left dorsal anterior insula and frontal pole atrophy. These findings indicate that insensitivity to negative information may be a key component of the reward-seeking behaviours in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia, and may relate to degeneration of structures that are involved in representing the emotional salience of sensory information.
引用
收藏
页码:3346 / 3356
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reward deficits in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia include insensitivity to negative stimuli
    Perry, D.
    Datta, S.
    Sturm, V.
    Wood, K.
    Zakrzewski, J.
    Miller, B.
    Kramer, J.
    Rosen, H.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY, 2016, 138 : 227 - 227
  • [2] Indifference to Sweaty Feet: Reward Deficits in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia Include Insensitivity to Negative Stimuli
    Datta, Samir
    Sturm, Virginia
    Wood, Kristie
    Zakrzewski, Jessica
    Miller, Bruce
    Kramer, Joel
    Rosen, Howard
    Perry, David
    NEUROLOGY, 2016, 86
  • [3] Frontomedian cortex is central for moral deficits in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia
    Schroeter, Matthias L.
    Bzdok, Danilo
    Eickhoff, Simon B.
    Neumann, Jane
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2015, 86 (06): : 700 - +
  • [4] Anatomical correlates of reward-seeking behaviours in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia
    Perry, David C.
    Sturm, Virginia E.
    Seeley, William W.
    Miller, Bruce L.
    Kramer, Joel H.
    Rosen, Howard J.
    BRAIN, 2014, 137 : 1621 - 1626
  • [5] Prosocial deficits in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia relate to reward network atrophy
    Sturm, Virginia E.
    Perry, David C.
    Wood, Kristie
    Hua, Alice Y.
    Alcantar, Oscar
    Datta, Samir
    Rankin, Katherine P.
    Rosen, Howard J.
    Miller, Bruce L.
    Kramer, Joel H.
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [6] Personality in behavioural variant Frontotemporal Dementia
    Pose, Mariangeles
    Gleichgerrcht, Ezequiel
    Lopez, Pablo
    Teresa, Torralva
    Torrente, Fernando
    Cetkovich, Marcelo
    Manes, Facundo F.
    Torralva, Teresa
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2012, 33 : 247 - 248
  • [7] Social cognition differentiates phenocopy syndrome of behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia
    van Engelen, Marie-Paule E.
    Louwers, Paulette
    Fieldhouse, Jay L. P.
    Gossink, Flora T.
    de Boer, Sterre C. M.
    Dols, Annemieke
    Scheltens, Philip
    Schouws, Sigfried N. T. M.
    Pijnenburg, Yolande A. L.
    Vijverberg, Everard G. B.
    Krudop, Welmoed A.
    PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (04) : 741 - 751
  • [8] Parsing cognitive and emotional empathy deficits for negative and positive stimuli in frontotemporal dementia
    Oliver, Lindsay D.
    Mitchell, Derek G. V.
    Dziobek, Isabel
    MacKinley, Julia
    Coleman, Kristy
    Rankin, Katherine P.
    Finger, Elizabeth C.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2015, 67 : 14 - 26
  • [9] Functional neural correlates of emotional expression processing deficits in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia
    Virani, Karim
    Jesso, Sarah
    Kertesz, Andrew
    Mitchell, Derek
    Finger, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 38 (03): : 174 - 182
  • [10] BEHAVIOURAL VARIANT FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA: A CASE REPORT
    Ng, Yin Ping
    Teh, Ewe Eow
    ASEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 14 (01): : 71 - 75