Survival Outcomes of Patients with Clinical Stage III Melanoma in the Era of Novel Systemic Therapies

被引:10
|
作者
Song, Yun [1 ]
Tieniber, Andrew D. [1 ]
Gimotty, Phyllis A. [2 ]
Mitchell, Tara C. [3 ]
Amaravadi, Ravi K. [3 ]
Schuchter, Lynn M. [3 ]
Fraker, Douglas L. [1 ]
Karakousis, Giorgos C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Surg, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Dept Biostat Epidemiol & Informat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; CANCER DATA-BASE; METASTATIC MELANOMA; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; IPILIMUMAB; NIVOLUMAB; INHIBITION;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-019-07599-y
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background. Immune checkpoint and BRAF-targeted inhibitors have demonstrated significant survival benefits for advanced melanoma patients within the context of clinical trials. We sought to determine their impact on overall survival (OS) at a population level in order to better understand the current landscape for patients diagnosed with clinical stage III melanoma. Methods. A retrospective study was performed using the National Cancer Database. Patients diagnosed with clinical stage III melanoma were categorized by diagnosis year into two cohorts preceding the advent of novel therapies (P1: 2004-2005, P2: 2008-2009) and a contemporary group (P3: 2012-2013). OS was estimated using standard time-to-event statistical methods. Results. Of 3720 patients, 525 (14%) were diagnosed in P1, 1375 (37%) in P2, and 1820 (49%) in P3. Median age at diagnosis increased over time (58, 59, and 61 years in P1, P2, and P3, respectively, P = 0.004). OS increased between P2 (median 49.3 months) and P3 (median 58.2 months, Bonferroni-corrected log-rank P < 0.001) but did not differ between P1 (median 50.5 months) and P2 (Bonferroni-corrected log-rank P > 0.99). These differences persisted on multivariable analysis. OS improved for patients diagnosed in P3 compared with P1 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.76, P < 0.001] but not P2 compared with P1 (HR 0.96, P = 0.52). Conclusions. OS has significantly improved nationally for patients newly diagnosed with clinical stage III melanoma in the era of novel melanoma therapies. OS outcomes will likely continue to evolve as these agents are increasingly utilized in the adjuvant setting. These data may help to better inform affected patients with respect to prognosis.
引用
收藏
页码:4621 / 4630
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Survival Outcomes of Patients with Clinical Stage III Melanoma in the Era of Novel Systemic Therapies
    Yun Song
    Andrew D. Tieniber
    Phyllis A. Gimotty
    Tara C. Mitchell
    Ravi K. Amaravadi
    Lynn M. Schuchter
    Douglas L. Fraker
    Giorgos C. Karakousis
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2019, 26 : 4621 - 4630
  • [2] Survival in melanoma brain metastases in the era of novel systemic therapies
    Merola, Joseph P.
    Ocen, Joanita
    Kumar, Satish
    Powell, James
    Hayhurst, Caroline
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY ADVANCES, 2020, 2 (01)
  • [3] SURVIVAL OF PATIENTS WITH MELANOMA METASTATIC BRAIN METASTASES IN THE ERA OF NOVEL SYSTEMIC THERAPIES IN CARDIFF, WALES
    Pasquale, Joseph
    Ocen, Joanita
    Powell, James
    Kumar, Satish
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 21 : 13 - 13
  • [4] Survival and clinical outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastasis in the era of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies
    Elham Vosoughi
    Jee Min Lee
    James R. Miller
    Mehdi Nosrati
    David R. Minor
    Roy Abendroth
    John W. Lee
    Brian T. Andrews
    Lewis Z. Leng
    Max Wu
    Stanley P. Leong
    Mohammed Kashani-Sabet
    Kevin B. Kim
    BMC Cancer, 18
  • [5] Survival and clinical outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastasis in the era of checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies
    Vosoughi, Elham
    Lee, Jee Min
    Miller, James R.
    Nosrati, Mehdi
    Minor, David R.
    Abendroth, Roy
    Lee, John W.
    Andrews, Brian T.
    Leng, Lewis Z.
    Wu, Max
    Leong, Stanley P.
    Kashani-Sabet, Mohammed
    Kim, Kevin B.
    BMC CANCER, 2018, 18
  • [6] Clinical Stage III Melanoma in the Contemporary Therapeutic Era
    Song, Y.
    Tieniber, A. D.
    Mitchell, T. C.
    Amaravadi, R. K.
    Schuchter, L. M.
    Fraker, D.
    Karakousis, G.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 : S48 - S49
  • [7] Protein signatures correspond to survival outcomes of AJCC stage III melanoma patients
    Mactier, Swetlana
    Kaufman, Kimberley L.
    Wang, Penghao
    Crossett, Ben
    Pupo, Gulietta M.
    Kohnke, Philippa L.
    Thompson, John F.
    Scolyer, Richard A.
    Yang, Jean Y.
    Mann, Graham J.
    Christopherson, Richard I.
    PIGMENT CELL & MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2014, 27 (06) : 1106 - 1116
  • [8] Calculation of survival of patients with stage III melanoma
    Berd, D
    Mastrangelo, MJ
    Sato, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (36) : 9427 - 9427
  • [9] Disparities in utilization of novel cancer therapies in advanced stage III and IV melanoma and variance in outcomes
    Ali, Mohammad S.
    Ahn, Jae
    Espat, N. Joseph
    Calvino, Abdul S.
    Koness, James
    Somasundar, Ponnandai
    Kwon, Steve
    IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2025, 17 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [10] Contemporary outcomes in stage III melanoma patients
    Gray, KD
    Xing, Y
    Feng, L
    Huang, X
    Davidson, L
    Gershenwald, JE
    Lee, JE
    Mansfield, PF
    Ross, MI
    Cormier, JN
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (02) : 58 - 59