Tree diameter structural diversity in Central European forests with Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica: managed versus unmanaged forest stands

被引:48
|
作者
Pach, Maciej [1 ]
Podlaski, Rafal [2 ]
机构
[1] Agr Univ Krakow, Dept Silviculture, PL-31425 Krakow, Poland
[2] Jan Kochanowski Univ, Inst Biol, Dept Nat Protect, PL-25406 Kielce, Poland
关键词
Structural diversity; Structural types; Tree diameter distribution; Mixture models; Forest management; INTERMEDIATE WIND DISTURBANCE; DOUGLAS-FIR FORESTS; BEECH FOREST; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSES; SPECIES-DIVERSITY; FINITE MIXTURE; DISTRIBUTIONS; GROWTH; BIODIVERSITY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.1007/s11284-014-1232-4
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The biodiversity of forest stands should be analysed from the point of view of not only compositional elements but also structural diversity. The main objective of this study was to compare tree diameter structural diversity of the mixed managed and unmanaged stands with Abies alba and Fagus sylvatica. There were 62 study plots established in the Carpathians (Southern Poland) and in the AewiA (TM) tokrzyskie Mountains (Central Poland) in managed and unmanaged stands. The comparison of the studied stands involved the identification and modelling of size structures, the use of the Gini coefficient and the relative distribution method (including entropy and polarisation). Six structural types were distinguished: three unimodals of a different width of diameter at breast height (DBH) range (mainly for the managed stands), reverse-J, rotated-sigmoid and bimodal (for unmanaged stands). Modelling of the distinguished structural types by means of theoretical distributions has shown that the best results of approximation for unimodal skewed and reverse-J DBH distributions were obtained with the single Weibull and gamma distribution, while in the case of rotated-sigmoid and bimodal DBH distributions the best results were obtained with mixture models. The comparisons have shown that tree diameter structural diversity was more complex in unmanaged forests compared to managed stands. For managed stands the Gini coefficient assumed values from 0.31 to 0.48, while in the case of the unmanaged forests, from 0.33 to 0.73. One should aim to increase tree diameter structural diversity in managed forests, adopting the close-to-nature silviculture concept which consists of imitating natural processes.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 384
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patterns of tree diameter distributions in managed and unmanaged Abies alba Mill. and Fagus sylvatica L. forest patches
    Podlaski, Rafal
    Sobala, Tomasz
    Kocurek, Maciej
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 435 : 97 - 105
  • [2] Diversity of patch structure in Central European forests: are tree diameter distributions in near-natural multilayered Abies-Fagus stands heterogeneous?
    Podlaski, Rafal
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 25 (03) : 599 - 608
  • [3] A quantitative comparison of the structural complexity of managed, lately unmanaged and primary European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests
    Stiers, Melissa
    Willim, Katharina
    Seidel, Dominik
    Ehbrecht, Martin
    Kabal, Myroslav
    Ammer, Christian
    Annighoefer, Peter
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 430 : 357 - 365
  • [4] Models of the fine-scale spatial distributions of trees in managed and unmanaged forest patches with Abies alba Mill. and Fagus sylvatica L.
    Podlaski, Rafal
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 439 : 1 - 8
  • [5] Neighborhood effects on tree growth in a Fagus sylvatica - Abies alba forest following an ice storm
    Ficko, Andrej
    Beljan, Karlo
    Vedris, Mislav
    Cavlovic, Jura
    Teslak, Krunoslav
    FOREST ECOSYSTEMS, 2024, 11
  • [6] Neighborhood effects on tree growth in a Fagus sylvatica-Abies alba forest following an ice storm
    Andrej Ficko
    Karlo Beljan
    Mislav Vedri
    Jura avlovi
    Krunoslav Teslak
    Forest Ecosystems, 2024, 11 (06) : 974 - 985
  • [7] Managed vs. unmanaged. Structure of beech forest stands (Fagus sylvatica L.) after 50 years of development, Central Bohemia
    Bilek, L.
    Remes, J.
    Zahradnik, D.
    FOREST SYSTEMS, 2011, 20 (01) : 122 - 138
  • [8] Large beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees as 'lifeboats' for lichen diversity in central European forests
    Hofmeister, Jenyk
    Hosek, Jan
    Malicek, Jiri
    Palice, Zdenek
    Syrovatkova, Lada
    Steinova, Jana
    Cernajova, Ivana
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 25 (06) : 1073 - 1090
  • [9] Large beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees as ‘lifeboats’ for lichen diversity in central European forests
    Jeňýk Hofmeister
    Jan Hošek
    Jiří Malíček
    Zdeněk Palice
    Lada Syrovátková
    Jana Steinová
    Ivana Černajová
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2016, 25 : 1073 - 1090
  • [10] Tree-related microhabitat diversity as a proxy for the conservation of beetle communities in managed forests of Fagus sylvatica
    Spina, Pierdomenico
    Parisi, Francesco
    Antonucci, Serena
    Garfi, Vittorio
    Marchetti, Marco
    Santopuoli, Giovanni
    FORESTRY, 2023, 97 (02): : 223 - 233