Assessing performance of utilizing organizational modularity to manage supply chains: Evidence in the US manufacturing sector

被引:17
作者
Cheng, Liang-Chieh [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Houston, Coll Technol, Dept Informat & Logist Technol, Houston, TX 77004 USA
关键词
Supply chain design; Modular design; Performance metrics; Outsourcing; MASS CUSTOMIZATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT; INNOVATION; IMPACT; GOVERNANCE; ECONOMIES; DESIGN; MODEL; PROFITABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.02.023
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Recent competition and customization have motivated manufacturers to institute modular organizations to manage supply chains. Proclaimed as a paradigm shift, organizational modularity manifests agility and flexibility to diversify product offerings, utilize production capacity, and allocate network capital and assets. Whereas studies have conceptualized the impacts of modular organizations, large-scale research that examines modularity's impacts on performance are lacking. The study assesses the impacts of organizational modularity in the US manufacturing sector. A set of hypotheses proposes that higher level of modularity is associated with higher efficiency and profitability. I found modularity to negatively affect product specialization and positively impact capacity utilization, ROI and ROA. The findings help to determine the robustness of utilizing the modularity for complex supply chain coordination. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:736 / 746
页数:11
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, Econometric Methods
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Designing and Managing the Supply Chain
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Econometric Analysis, DOI DOI 10.1093/GERONB/GBQ006
[4]  
Bae JH, 2004, ACAD MANAGE J, V47, P843
[5]   TECHNICAL CHANGE, COMPETITION AND VERTICAL INTEGRATION [J].
BALAKRISHNAN, S ;
WERNERFELT, B .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1986, 7 (04) :347-359
[6]   Where do transactions come from? Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms [J].
Baldwin, Carliss Y. .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2008, 17 (01) :155-195
[7]  
Banker RD, 1996, STRATEGIC MANAGE J, V17, P693, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199611)17:9<693::AID-SMJ847>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-W
[9]   PERFORMANCE DIFFERENCES IN RELATED AND UNRELATED DIVERSIFIED FIRMS [J].
BETTIS, RA .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1981, 2 (04) :379-393
[10]   Impact of plant size and focus on productivity: An empirical study [J].
Brush, T ;
Karnani, A .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (07) :1065-1081