Relocation of children after divorce and children's best interests: New evidence and legal considerations

被引:62
|
作者
Braver, SL [1 ]
Ellman, IM
Fabricius, WV
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Dept Psychol, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Earl Warren Inst, Boalt Hall Sch Law, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Law, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0893-3200.17.2.206
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Relocation cases, in which a divorced parent seeks to move away with the child, are among the knottiest problems facing family courts. The recent trend is to permit such moves, largely because of Wallerstein's (1995) controversial amica curiae brief, which a recent court (Baures v. Lewis, 2001) interpreted as supporting the conclusion that "in general, what is good for the custodial parent is good for the child" (p. 222). The current study provides the first direct evidence on relocation by dividing college students into groups on the basis of their divorced parents' move-away status. On most child outcomes, the ones whose parents moved are significantly disadvantaged. This suggests courts should give greater weight to the child's separate interests in deciding such cases.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 219
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条