A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol

被引:133
|
作者
Johnson, JL
White, KR
Widen, JE
Gravel, JS
James, M
Kennalley, T
Maxon, AB
Spivak, L
Sullivan-Mahoney, M
Vohr, BR
Weirather, Y
Holstrum, J
机构
[1] Utah State Univ, Natl Ctr Hearing Assessment & Management, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[2] Univ Hawaii, Ctr Disabil Studies, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[3] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[4] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[5] Jacobi Med Ctr, Bronx, NY 10467 USA
[6] Arnold Palmer Hosp Infants & Women, Orlando, FL USA
[7] Via Christi Reg Med Ctr, Wichita, KS USA
[8] New England Ctr Hearing Rehabil, Hampton, VA USA
[9] Long Isl Jewish Med Ctr, New Hyde Pk, NY 11042 USA
[10] Good Samaritan Hosp, Cincinnati, OH USA
[11] Women & Infants Hosp Rhode Isl, Providence, RI USA
[12] Kapiolani Med Ctr Women & Infants, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
关键词
hearing loss; hearing screening; efficacy;
D O I
10.1542/peds.2004-1688
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective. Ninety percent of all newborns in the United States are now screened for hearing loss before they leave the hospital. Many hospitals use a 2- stage protocol for newborn hearing screening in which all infants are screened first with otoacoustic emissions (OAE). No additional testing is done with infants who pass the OAE, but infants who fail the OAE next are screened with automated auditory brainstem response (A- ABR). Infants who fail the A- ABR screening are referred for diagnostic testing to determine whether they have permanent hearing loss (PHL). Those who pass the A- ABR are considered at low risk for hearing loss and are not tested further. The objective of this multicenter study was to determine whether a substantial number of infants who fail the initial OAE and pass the A- ABR have PHL at similar to 9 months of age. Methods. Seven birthing centers with successful newborn hearing screening programs using a 2- stage OAE/A-ABR screening protocol participated. During the study period, 86 634 infants were screened for hearing loss at these sites. Of those infants who failed the OAE but passed the A-ABR in at least 1 ear, 1524 were enrolled in the study. Data about prenatal, neonatal, and socioeconomic factors, plus hearing loss risk indicators, were collected for all enrolled infants. When the infants were an average of 9.7 months of age, diagnostic audiologic evaluations were done for 64% of the enrolled infants ( 1432 ears from 973 infants). Results. Twenty- one infants (30 ears) who had failed the OAE but passed the A- ABR during the newborn hearing screening were identified with permanent bilateral or unilateral hearing loss. Twenty- three (77%) of the ears had mild hearing loss (average of 1 kHz, 2 kHz, and 4 kHz <= 40- decibel hearing level). Nine (43%) infants had bilateral as opposed to unilateral loss, and 18 (86%) infants had sensorineural as opposed to permanent conductive hearing loss. Conclusions. If all infants were screened for hearing loss using the 2- stage OAE/ A- ABR newborn hearing screening protocol currently used in many hospitals, then similar to 23% of those with PHL at similar to 9 months of age would have passed the A- ABR. This happens in part because much of the A-ABR screening equipment in current use was designed to identify infants with moderate or greater hearing loss. Thus, program administrators should be certain that the screening program, equipment, and protocols are designed to identify the type of hearing loss targeted by their program. The results also show the need for continued surveillance of hearing status during childhood.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 672
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Newborn hearing screening by otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response
    Doyle, KJ
    Burggraaff, B
    Fujikawa, S
    Kim, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 1997, 41 (02) : 111 - 119
  • [2] A model of two-stage newborn hearing screening with automated auditory brainstem response
    Iwasaki, S
    Hayashi, Y
    Seki, A
    Nagura, M
    Hashimoto, Y
    Oshima, G
    Hoshino, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 67 (10) : 1099 - 1104
  • [3] Comparison of two instruments for universal newborn hearing screening: Automated auditory brainstem response versus otoacoustic emissions.
    Graves, GR
    Malphurs, O
    Marlett, R
    PEDIATRICS, 1998, 102 (03) : 754 - 754
  • [4] Newborn hearing screening with transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and automatic auditory brainstem response
    Jardim, Isabela de Souza
    Matas, Carla Gentile
    Mamede de Carvallo, Renata Mota
    EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, 2008, 6 (03): : 253 - 261
  • [5] A Comparative Analysis of Otoacoustic Emission and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response for Newborn Hearing Screening
    Vivek, K. V.
    Chhina, Amitoj Singh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2024, 91 (11): : 1209 - 1209
  • [6] Evaluation of otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem responses for hearing screening of high risk infants
    Nazir, Tania
    Gupta, Sachin
    Mir, Ghulam Mohammad
    Jamwal, Ashu
    Kalsotra, Parmod
    Singh, K. P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2016, 22 (04) : 221 - 230
  • [7] A comparison of automated auditory brainstem responses and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions for universal newborn hearing screening
    Korres, Stavros G.
    Balatsouras, Dimitrios G.
    Lyra, Chrysa
    Kandiloros, Dimitris
    Ferekidis, Eleftherios
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2006, 12 (06): : CR260 - CR263
  • [8] Hearing evaluation in children with meningitis by auditory brainstem response and otoacoustic emissions
    Tonekaboni, Seyed Hassan
    Shamsabadi, Farhad Mahvelad
    Khojasteh, Ornid
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2007, 17 : 285 - 288
  • [9] Automated auditory brainstem response testing for universal newborn hearing screening
    Erenberg, S
    OTOLARYNGOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 32 (06) : 999 - +
  • [10] Comparison of two-step transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for universal newborn hearing screening programs
    Benito-Orejas, J. I.
    Ramirez, B.
    Morais, D.
    Alamaraz, A.
    Fernandez-Calvoc, J. L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2008, 72 (08) : 1193 - 1201