Ilizarov bone transport versus fibular graft for reconstruction of tibial bone defects in children

被引:17
|
作者
Abdelkhalek, Mostafa [1 ]
El-Alfy, Barakat [1 ]
Ali, Ayman M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Mansoura 3115, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS-PART B | 2016年 / 25卷 / 06期
关键词
fibular graft; Ilizarov; tibial defect; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BPB.0000000000000334
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the results of treatment of segmental tibial defects in the pediatric age group using an Ilizarov external fixator versus a nonvascularized fibular bone graft. This study included 24 patients (age range from 5.5 to 15 years) with tibial bone defects: 13 patients were treated with bone transport (BT) and 11 patients were treated with a nonvascularized fibular graft (FG). The outcome parameters were bone results (union, deformity, infection, leg-length discrepancy) and functional results: external fixation index and external fixation time. In group A (BT), one patient developed refracture at the regenerate site, whereas, in group B (FG), after removal of the external fixator, one of the FGs developed a stress fracture. The external fixator time in group A was 10.7 months (range 8-14.5) versus 7.8 months (range 4-11.5 months) in group B (FG). In group A (BT), one patient had a limb-length discrepancy (LLD), whereas, in group B (FG), three patients had LLD. The functional and bone results of the Ilizarov BT technique were excellent in 23.1 and 30.8%, good in 38.5 and 46.2, fair in 30.8 and 15.4, and poor in 7.6 and 7.6%, respectively. The poor functional result was related to the poor bone result because of prolonged external fixator time resulting in significant pain, limited ankle motion, whereas the functional and bone results of fibular grafting were excellent in 9.1 and 18.2%, good in 63.6 and 45.5%, fair in 18.2 and 27.2%, and poor in 9.1 and 9.1%, respectively. Segmental tibial defects can be effectively treated with both methods. The FG method provides satisfactory results, with early removal of the external fixator. However, it had a limitation in patients with severe infection and those with LLD. Also, it requires a long duration of limb bracing until adequate hypertrophy of the graft. The Ilizarov method has the advantages of early weight bearing, treatment of postinfection bone defect in a one-stage surgery, and the possibility to treat the associated LLD. However, it has a long external fixation time. Copyright (C) 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:556 / 560
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ilizarov bone transport for massive tibial bone defects
    Abdel-Aal, AM
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2006, 29 (01) : 70 - 74
  • [2] Ilizarov bone transport treatment for tibial defects
    Paley, D
    Maar, DC
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2000, 14 (02) : 76 - 85
  • [3] Treatment options for infected bone defects in the lower extremities: free vascularized fibular graft or Ilizarov bone transport?
    Ren, Gao-hong
    Li, Runguang
    Hu, Yanjun
    Chen, Yirong
    Chen, Chaojie
    Yu, Bin
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [4] Treatment options for infected bone defects in the lower extremities: free vascularized fibular graft or Ilizarov bone transport?
    Gao-hong Ren
    Runguang Li
    Yanjun Hu
    Yirong Chen
    Chaojie Chen
    Bin Yu
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [5] Ilizarov technique: Bone transport versus bone shortening-lengthening for tibial bone and soft-tissue defects
    Wu, Yongwei
    Yin, Qudong
    Rui, Yongjun
    Sun, Zhenzhong
    Gu, Sanjun
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2018, 23 (02) : 341 - 345
  • [6] Tibial bone defects treated by internal bone transport using the Ilizarov method
    Song, HR
    Cho, SH
    Koo, KH
    Jeong, ST
    Park, YJ
    Ko, JH
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 1998, 22 (05) : 293 - 297
  • [7] Tibial bone defects treated by internal bone transport using the Ilizarov method
    H.-R. Song
    S.-H. Cho
    K.-H. Koo
    S.-T. Jeong
    Y.-J. Park
    J.-H. Ko
    International Orthopaedics, 1998, 22 : 293 - 297
  • [8] Vascularized fibular grafts for the reconstruction of segmental tibial bone defects
    H. Takami
    S. Takahashi
    M. Ando
    A. Masuda
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 1997, 116 : 404 - 407
  • [9] Vascularized fibular grafts for the reconstruction of segmental tibial bone defects
    Takami, H
    Takahashi, S
    Ando, M
    Masuda, A
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1997, 116 (6-7) : 404 - 407
  • [10] Reconstruction of Bone Defects After Osteomyelitis with Nonvascularized Fibular Graft
    Patwardhan, Sandeep
    Shyam, Ashok K.
    Mody, Rustom Adi
    Sancheti, Parag K.
    Mehta, Rujuta
    Agrawat, Hardik
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 95A (09): : e561 - e566