Prehospital and En Route Analgesic Use in the Combat Setting: A Prospectively Designed, Multicenter, Observational Study

被引:29
|
作者
Petz, Lawrence N. [1 ]
Tyner, Stuart [3 ]
Barnard, Ed [2 ,4 ]
Ervin, Alicia [2 ]
Mora, Alex [2 ]
Clifford, John [1 ]
Fowler, Marcie [1 ]
Bebarta, Vikhyat S. [2 ]
机构
[1] US Army Inst Surg Res, San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Battlefield Pain Management, Jbsa Ft Sam Houston, TX 78234 USA
[2] US Army Inst Surg Res, San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Air Force En Route Care Res Ctr, Jbsa Ft Sam Houston, TX 78234 USA
[3] US Army Inst Surg Res, San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Jbsa Ft Sam Houston, TX 78234 USA
[4] Inst Naval Med, Alverstoke PO12 2DL, England
关键词
PAIN MANAGEMENT; TRAUMA ANALGESIA; CASUALTY CARE; KETAMINE; BATTLEFIELD; MORPHINE; RELIEF; IRAQ; WAR;
D O I
10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00383
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Combat injuries result in acute, severe pain. Early use of analgesia after injury is known to be beneficial. Studies on prehospital analgesia in combat are limited and no prospectively designed study has reported the use of analgesics in the prehospital and en route care setting. Our objective was to describe the current use of prehospital analgesia in the combat setting. Methods: This prospectively designed, multicenter, observational, prehospital combat study was undertaken at medical treatment facilities (MTF) in Afghanistan between October 2012 and September 2013. It formed part of a larger study aimed at describing the use of lifesaving interventions in combat. On arrival at the MTF, trained on-site investigators enrolled eligible patients and completed standardized data capture forms, which included the name, dose, and route of administration of all prehospital analgesics, and the type of provider who administered the drug. Physiological data were retrospectively ascribed as soon as practicable. The study was prospectively approved by the Brooke Army Medical Center institutional review board. Results: Data were collected on 228 patients, with 305 analgesia administrations recorded. The predominant mechanism of injury was blast (50%), followed by penetrating (41%), and blunt (9%). The most common analgesic used was ketamine, followed by morphine. A combination of analgesics was given to 29% of patients; the most common combination was ketamine and morphine. Intravenous delivery was the most commonly used route (55%). Patients transported by the UK Medical Emergency Response Team (MERT) or U.S. Air Medical Evacuation (Dust-off) team were more likely to receive ketamine than those evacuated by U.S. Pararescue Jumpers (Pedro). Patients transported by Medical Emergency Response Team or Pedro were more likely to receive more than 1 drug. Patients who received only ketamine had a higher pulse rate (p < 0.005) and lower systolic blood pressure (p = 0.01) than other groups, and patients that received hydromorphone had a lower respiratory rate (p = 0.04). Conclusions: In our prospectively designed, multicenter, observational, prehospital combat study, ketamine was the most commonly used analgesic drug. The most frequently observed combination of drugs was ketamine and morphine. The intravenous route was used for 55% of drug administrations.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 18
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prehospital blood transfusion in the en route management of severe combat trauma: A matched cohort study
    O'Reilly, David J.
    Morrison, Jonathan J.
    Jansen, Jan O.
    Apodaca, Amy N.
    Rasmussen, Todd E.
    Midwinter, Mark J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2014, 77 : S114 - S120
  • [2] Prehospital Blood Transfusion in the En Route Management of Severe Combat Trauma: A Matched Cohort Study
    O'Reilly, D. J.
    Morrison, J. J.
    Apodoca-Morrison, A. N.
    Jansen, J. O.
    Midwinter, M. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 114 - 114
  • [3] Multicenter observational prehospital resuscitation on helicopter study
    Holcomb, John B.
    Swartz, Michael D.
    DeSantis, Stacia M.
    Greene, Thomas J.
    Fox, Erin E.
    Stein, Deborah M.
    Bulger, Eileen M.
    Kerby, Jeffrey D.
    Goodman, Michael
    Schreiber, Martin A.
    Zielinski, Martin D.
    O'Keeffe, Terence
    Inaba, Kenji
    Tomasek, Jeffrey S.
    Podbielski, Jeanette M.
    Appana, Savitri N.
    Yi, Misung
    Wade, Charles E.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2017, 83 : S83 - S91
  • [4] Acceptable Blood Pressure Levels in the Prehospital Setting for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Observational Study
    Shibahashi, Keita
    Hoda, Hidenori
    Okura, Yoshihiro
    Hamabe, Yuichi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 149 : E504 - E511
  • [5] Acceptable Blood Pressure Levels in the Prehospital Setting for Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Multicenter Observational Study
    Shibahashi, Keita
    Hoda, Hidenori
    Okura, Yoshihiro
    Hamabe, Yuichi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 149 : E504 - E511
  • [6] NEEDLE THORACOSTOMY IN THE PREHOSPITAL SETTING: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY
    Weichenthal, Lori
    Crane, Desiree
    Rond, Luke
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2016, 20 (03) : 399 - 403
  • [7] Paramedic Recognition of Sepsis in the Prehospital Setting: A Prospective Observational Study
    Green, Robert S.
    Travers, Andrew H.
    Cain, Edward
    Campbell, Samuel G.
    Jensen, Jan L.
    Petrie, David A.
    Erdogan, Mete
    Patrick, Gredi
    Patrick, Ward
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [8] Pain Management in a Prehospital Emergency Setting: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Ferri, Paola
    Gambaretto, Carlo
    Alberti, Sara
    Parogni, Pierpaolo
    Rovesti, Sergio
    Di Lorenzo, Rosaria
    Sollami, Alfonso
    Bargellini, Annalisa
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 3433 - 3445
  • [9] Multicenter, Prospective Study of Prehospital Administration of Analgesia in the US Combat Theater of Afghanistan
    Schauer, Steven G.
    Mora, Alejandra G.
    Maddry, Joseph K.
    Bebarta, Vikhyat S.
    PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2017, 21 (06) : 744 - 749
  • [10] Prehospital interventions performed in a combat zone: A prospective multicenter study of 1,003 combat wounded
    Lairet, Julio R.
    Bebarta, Vikhyat S.
    Burns, Christopher J.
    Lairet, Kimberly F.
    Rasmussen, Todd E.
    Renz, Evan M.
    King, Booker T.
    Fernandez, William
    Gerhardt, Robert
    Butler, Frank
    DuBose, Joseph
    Cestero, Ramon
    Salinas, Jose
    Torres, Pedro
    Minnick, Joanne
    Blackbourne, Lorne H.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2012, 73 : S38 - S42