Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz compared with zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in treatment-naive patients - 144-week analysis

被引:169
|
作者
Arribas, Jose R. [2 ]
Pozniak, Anton L. [3 ]
Gallant, Joel E. [4 ]
DeJesus, Edwin [5 ]
Gazzard, Brian [3 ]
Campo, Rafael E. [6 ]
Chen, Shan-Shan [1 ]
McColl, Damian [1 ]
Holmes, Charles B. [1 ]
Enejosa, Jeffrey [1 ]
Toole, John J. [1 ]
Cheng, Andrew K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gilead Sci Inc, Foster City, CA 94404 USA
[2] Hosp La Paz, Internal Med Serv, Madrid, Spain
[3] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, St Stephens Ctr, London, England
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] Orlando Immunol Ctr, Orlando, FL USA
[6] Univ Miami, Div Infect Dis, Miami, FL 33152 USA
关键词
antiretroviral naive; emtricitabine; lamivudine; lipoatrophy; tenofovir; zidovudine;
D O I
10.1097/QAI.0b013e31815acab8
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: As antiretroviral regimens for the treatment of HIV infection improve, trials providing data on long-term follow-up are increasingly important. Methods: A regimen of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine (FTC), and efavirenz (EFV) demonstrated superior virologic, immunologic and morphologic effects compared with a regimen of fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine (ZDV/3TC) and EFV through 96 weeks in a randomized open-label trial. After 96 weeks, patients on TDF + FTC transitioned to fixed-dose combination TDF/FTC. Results: Through 144 weeks, significantly more patients in the TDF/FTC arm reached and maintained an HIV RNA level <400 copies/mL (71% receiving TDF/FTC and EFV vs. 58% receiving ZDV/3TC and EFV; P = 0.004), with a trend toward greater CD4 cell increase in the TDF/FTC arm (312 vs. 271 cells/mm(3); P = 0.09). Over 144 weeks of follow-up, more patients in the ZDV/3TC arm discontinued therapy because of adverse events (11% vs. 5%; P = 0.01) and no patients discontinued because of renal events. Patients in the ZDV/3TC arm had significantly less limb fat than patients in the TDF/FTC arm (5.4 vs. 7.9 kg; P < 0.001) at 144 weeks. Conclusions: Cumulative results from 3 years of follow-up suggest that a regimen of TDF/FTC and EFV demonstrates superior durability of viral load suppression and an improved safety and morphologic profile compared with ZDV/3TC and EFV.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 78
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Resistance development over 144 weeks in treatment-naive patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or stavudine with lamivudine and efavirenz in Study 903
    Margot, N. A.
    Lu, B.
    Cheng, A.
    Miller, M. D.
    HIV MEDICINE, 2006, 7 (07) : 442 - 450
  • [2] Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine, and efavirenz versus fixed-dose zidovudine/lamivudine and efavirenz in anti retroviral-naive patients - Virologic, immunologic, and morphologic changes - A 96-week analysis
    Pozniak, Anton L.
    Gallant, Joel E.
    DeJesus, Edwin
    Arribas, Jose R.
    Gazzard, Brian
    Campo, Rael E.
    Chen, Shan-Shan
    McColl, Damian
    Enejosa, Jeffrey
    Toole, John J.
    Cheng, Andrew K.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2006, 43 (05) : 535 - 540
  • [3] Development of HIV-1 Drug Resistance Through 144 Weeks in Antiretroviral-Naive Subjects on Emtricitabine, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, and Efavirenz Compared With Lamivudine/Zidovudine and Efavirenz in Study GS-01-934
    Margot, Nicolas A.
    Enejosa, Jeff
    Cheng, Andrew K.
    Miller, Michael D.
    McColl, Damian J.
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2009, 52 (02) : 209 - 221
  • [4] Week 48 results from a randomized clinical trial of rilpivirine/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate vs. efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected adults
    Cohen, Calvin
    Wohl, David
    Arribas, Jose R.
    Henry, Keith
    Van Lunzen, Jan
    Bloch, Mark
    Towner, William
    Wilkins, Edmund
    Ebrahimi, Ramin
    Porter, Danielle
    White, Kirsten
    Walker, Ivan
    Chuck, Susan
    De-Oertel, Shampa
    Fralich, Todd
    AIDS, 2014, 28 (07) : 989 - 997
  • [5] Tenofovir DF, emtricitabine, and efavirenz vs. zidovudine, lamivudine, and efavirenz for HIV
    Gallant, JE
    DeJesus, E
    Arribas, JR
    Pozniak, AL
    Gazzard, B
    Campo, RE
    Lu, B
    McColl, D
    Chuck, S
    Enejosa, J
    Toole, JJ
    Cheng, AK
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 354 (03): : 251 - 260
  • [6] Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate is Non-inferior to Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Treatment-naive Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Infection: Week 48 Results of the DRIVE-AHEAD Trial
    Orkin, Chloe
    Squires, Kathleen E.
    Molina, Jean-Michel
    Sax, Paul E.
    Wong, Wing-Wai
    Sussmann, Otto
    Kaplan, Richard
    Lupinacci, Lisa
    Rodgers, Anthony
    Xu, Xia
    Lin, Gina
    Kumar, Sushma
    Sklar, Peter
    Nguyen, Bach-Yen
    Hanna, George J.
    Hwang, Carey
    Martin, Elizabeth A.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 68 (04) : 535 - 544
  • [7] Efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate - Triple combination tablet
    Frampton, James E.
    Croom, Katherine F.
    DRUGS, 2006, 66 (11) : 1501 - 1512
  • [9] Week 144 resistance analysis of elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-naive patients
    White, Kirsten L.
    Kulkarni, Rima
    McColl, Damian J.
    Rhee, Martin S.
    Szwarcberg, Javier
    Cheng, Andrew K.
    Miller, Michael D.
    ANTIVIRAL THERAPY, 2015, 20 (03) : 317 - 327