Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins

被引:2
|
作者
Panda, Arup [1 ]
Tuller, Tamir [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
Intrinsically disordered protein; Comparative genomics; Gene function; Proteome evolution; Z-score; INTRINSIC DISORDER; GENE-EXPRESSION; EFFICIENCY; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gpb.2020.06.005
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are an important class of proteins in all domains of life for their functional importance. However, how nature has shaped the disorder potential of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins is still not clearly known. Randomly generated sequences are free of any selective constraints, thus these sequences are commonly used as null models. Considering different types of random protein models, here we seek to understand how the disorder potential of natural eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteins differs from random sequences. Comparing proteome-wide disorder content between real and random sequences of 12 model organisms, we noticed that eukaryotic proteins are enriched in disordered regions compared to random sequences, but in prokaryotes such regions are depleted. By analyzing the position-wise disorder profile, we show that there is a generally higher disorder near the N-and C-terminal regions of eukaryotic proteins as compared to the random models; however, either no or a weak such trend was found in prokaryotic proteins. Moreover, here we show that this preference is not caused by the amino acid or nucleotide composition at the respective sites. Instead, these regions were found to be endowed with a higher fraction of protein-protein binding sites, suggesting their functional importance. We discuss several possible explanations for this pattern, such as improving the efficiency of protein-protein interaction, ribosome movement during translation, and post-translational modification. However, further studies are needed to clearly understand the biophysical mechanisms causing the trend.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 564
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring Potential Signals of Selection for Disordered Residues in Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Proteins
    Arup Panda
    Tamir Tuller
    Genomics,Proteomics & Bioinformatics, 2020, (05) : 549 - 564
  • [2] Expression of eukaryotic membrane proteins in eukaryotic and prokaryotic hosts
    Kesidis, Athanasios
    Depping, Peer
    Lode, Alexis
    Vaitsopoulou, Afroditi
    Bill, Roslyn M.
    Goddard, Alan D.
    Rothnie, Alice J.
    METHODS, 2020, 180 : 3 - 18
  • [3] Camps 2.0: Exploring the sequence and structure space of prokaryotic, eukaryotic, and viral membrane proteins
    Neumann, Sindy
    Hartmann, Holger
    Martin-Galiano, Antonio J.
    Fuchs, Angelika
    Frishman, Dmitrij
    PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2012, 80 (03) : 839 - 857
  • [4] Strategies for prokaryotic expression of eukaryotic membrane proteins
    Laage, R
    Langosch, D
    TRAFFIC, 2001, 2 (02) : 99 - 104
  • [5] PROKARYOTIC AND EUKARYOTIC CELL-CYCLE PROTEINS
    ROBINSON, AC
    COLLINS, JF
    DONACHIE, WD
    NATURE, 1987, 328 (6133) : 766 - 766
  • [6] Function of prokaryotic and eukaryotic ABC proteins in lipid transport
    Pohl, A
    Devaux, PF
    Herrmann, A
    BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY OF LIPIDS, 2005, 1733 (01): : 29 - 52
  • [7] Comparison of folding rates of homologous prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins
    Widmann, M
    Christen, P
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2000, 275 (25) : 18619 - 18622
  • [8] EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION OF FOREIGN PROTEINS IN PROKARYOTIC AND EUKARYOTIC SYSTEMS
    不详
    FASEB JOURNAL, 1992, 6 (05): : A2067 - A2067
  • [9] DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE TO FRAMESHIFT SIGNALS IN EUKARYOTIC AND PROKARYOTIC TRANSLATIONAL SYSTEMS
    GARCIA, A
    VANDUIN, J
    PLEIJ, CWA
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1993, 21 (03) : 401 - 406
  • [10] Using AdaBoost for the prediction of subcellular location of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins
    Bing Niu
    Yu-Huan Jin
    Kai-Yan Feng
    Wen-Cong Lu
    Yu-Dong Cai
    Guo-Zheng Li
    Molecular Diversity, 2008, 12