Validation of the Spanish Version of the Lucidity and Consciousness in Dreams Scale

被引:2
|
作者
Garcia-Campayo, Javier [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Moyano, Nieves [5 ]
Modrego-Alarcon, Marta [4 ,6 ]
Herrera-Mercadal, Paola [4 ,6 ]
Puebla-Guedea, Marta [4 ,7 ]
Campos, Daniel [4 ,6 ]
Gascon, Santiago [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Dept Med Psychiat & Dermatol, Zaragoza, Spain
[2] Primary Care Prevent & Hlth Promot Res Network, Madrid, Spain
[3] Hosp Univ Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
[4] Inst Invest Sanitaria Aragon IIS Aragon, Zaragoza, Spain
[5] Univ Jaen, Fac Humanities & Educ Sci, Dept Psychol, Jaen, Spain
[6] Univ Zaragoza, Fac Humanities & Educ Sci, Dept Psychol & Sociol, Huesca, Spain
[7] Univ Zaragoza, Fac Social & Lab Sci, Dept Psychol & Sociol, Zaragoza, Spain
[8] Univ Zaragoza, Fac Social Sci & Humanities, Dept Psychol & Sociol, Teruel, Spain
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2021年 / 12卷
关键词
consciousness; lucidity; dreams; insight; meditation; mindfulness; emotion; THREAT SIMULATION THEORY; MINDFULNESS QUESTIONNAIRE; REM-SLEEP; INDUCTION; FACETS; WAKING;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.742438
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Lucid dreaming, a specific phenomenon of dream consciousness, refers to the experience being aware that one is dreaming. The primary aim of this research was to validate a Spanish version of the Lucidity and Consciousness in Dreams scale (LuCiD). A secondary aim was to explore whether meditation experience and mindfulness trait were related to LuCiD scores. Data from 367 Spanish men (34.6%) and women (65.4%) who completed LuCiD, the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ), and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) were examined. From the total sample, 40.3% indicated some experience with formal meditation (meditators), while 59.7% did not have any meditation experience (non-meditators). A random subsample of 101 participants, who completed LuCiD for a second time after a period of 10-15days, was used for test-retest reliability analysis. The LuCiD scale comprises 28 items distributed across eight factors: insight, control, thought, realism, memory, dissociation, negative emotion, and positive emotion. Factor structure, reliability by both internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and construct and concurrent validity were tested. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the original eight-factor model, showing goodness of fit in contrast to a single-factor model. Item 15 was deleted from the Dissociation factor as it performed poorly (i.e., skewness and kurtosis, non-normal distribution of responses, and corrected item-total correlation under 0.40). The scale showed adequate values of internal consistency (between alpha=0.65 for Memory and alpha=0.83 for Positive Emotion) and test-retest reliability by significant Pearson correlations (p < 0.001) for each factor. The scores of meditators were higher for the LuCiD scale Insight and Dissociation factors, in contrast to those of non-meditators. The Observing facet of mindfulness was positively associated with all LuCiD factors, except Realism and Positive Emotion, and the Acting with Awareness facet showed a negative correlation with the LuCiD factor Realism. Finally, positive and negative affects was associated with the LuCiD factors Positive Emotion and Negative Emotion. This study provides a valid and reliable measure for exploring lucidity and consciousness in dreams for a Spanish population, Moreover, the results suggest a relationship with meditation experience, mindfulness trait, and positive and negative affect.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measuring consciousness in dreams: The lucidity and consciousness in dreams scale
    Voss, Ursula
    Schermelleh-Engel, Karin
    Windt, Jennifer
    Frenzel, Clemens
    Hobson, Allan
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2013, 22 (01) : 8 - 21
  • [2] LUCIDITY IN DREAMS
    STRUNZ, F
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KLINISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE PSYCHIATRIE UND PSYCHOTHERAPIE, 1986, 34 (03): : 234 - 248
  • [3] Validation of the Spanish version of Supports Intensity Scale
    Verdugo, M.
    Arias, B.
    Ibanez, A.
    Gomez, L.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2006, 19 (03) : 274 - 274
  • [4] Validation of the Spanish version of the social functioning scale
    Torres, A
    Olivares, JM
    ACTAS ESPANOLAS DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2005, 33 (04): : 216 - 220
  • [5] Validation of a Spanish version of the Decisional Conflict Scale
    Urrutia, Mila
    Campos, Solange
    O'Connor, Annette
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2008, 136 (11) : 1439 - 1447
  • [6] Validation of the Spanish version of the body vigilance scale
    Amarilla, Diego
    Arzate, Raul
    Barrios, Ivan
    O'Higgins, Marcelo
    Figueredo, Pamela
    Almiron-Santacruz, Jose
    Ruiz-Diaz, Noelia
    Melgarejo, Osvaldo
    Castaldelli-Maia, Joao Mauricio
    Ventriglio, Antonio
    Torales, Julio
    ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (04):
  • [7] Validation of a Spanish version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
    Vega-Dienstmaier, JM
    Suárez, GM
    Sánchez, MC
    ACTAS ESPANOLAS DE PSIQUIATRIA, 2002, 30 (02): : 106 - 111
  • [8] Validation of the Spanish version of the Commitment to Running Scale (CR)
    Ruiz-Juan, Francisco
    Zarauz, Antonio
    ESTUDIOS DE PSICOLOGIA, 2011, 32 (02): : 195 - 207
  • [9] Validation of the Spanish Version of the Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale
    Fasce, Angelo
    Avendano, Diego
    Dagnall, Neil
    Denovan, Andrew
    Escola-Gascon, Alex
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 25
  • [10] Validation of the Spanish version of the Eating Disorders Diagnostic Scale
    Silva, Jaime R.
    Behar, Rosa
    Cordella, Patricia
    Ortiz, Manuel
    Jaramillo, Karina
    Alvarado, Ruben
    Jose Jorquera, Maria
    REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 2012, 140 (12) : 1562 - 1570