共 50 条
Investigation of selection bias in the association of race with prevalent atrial fibrillation in a national cohort study: REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS)
被引:2
|作者:
Thacker, Evan L.
[1
,2
]
Soliman, Elsayed Z.
[3
,4
]
Pulley, LeaVonne
[5
]
Safford, Monika M.
[6
]
Howard, George
[7
]
Howard, Virginia J.
[2
]
机构:
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Hlth Sci, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Epidemiol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent, Epidemiol Cardiol Res Ctr EPICARE, Winston Salem, NC USA
[4] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Med, Cardiol Sect, Winston Salem, NC USA
[5] Univ Arkansas Med Sci, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
[6] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Sch Med, Dept Med, Birmingham, AL USA
[7] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Biostat, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词:
Selection bias;
Cohort study;
Atrial fibrillation;
Race;
RISK-FACTORS;
ATHEROSCLEROSIS RISK;
UNITED-STATES;
OLDER-ADULTS;
WHITES;
EPIDEMIOLOGY;
ADMISSIONS;
MORTALITY;
PARADOX;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1016/j.annepidem.2016.06.012
中图分类号:
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号:
1004 ;
120402 ;
摘要:
Purpose: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is diagnosed more commonly in whites than blacks in the United States. In epidemiologic studies, selection bias could induce a noncausal positive association of white race with prevalent AF if voluntary enrollment was influenced by both race and AF status. We investigated whether nonrandom enrollment biased the association of race with prevalent self-reported AF in the US-based REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke Study (REGARDS). Methods: REGARDS had a two-stage enrollment process, allowing us to compare 30,183 fully enrolled REGARDS participants with 12,828 people who completed the first-stage telephone survey but did not complete the second-stage in-home visit to finalize their REGARDS enrollment (telephone-only participants). Results: REGARDS enrollment was higher among whites (77.1%) than among blacks (62.3%) but did not differ by self-reported AF status. The prevalence of AF was 8.45% in whites and 5.86% in blacks adjusted for age, sex, income, education, and perceived general health. The adjusted white/black prevalence ratio of self-reported AF was 1.43 (95% CI, 1.32-1.56) among REGARDS participants and 1.38 (1.22-1.55) among telephone-only participants. Conclusions: These findings suggest that selection bias is not a viable explanation for the higher prevalence of self-reported AF among whites in population studies such as REGARDS. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:534 / 539
页数:6
相关论文