Life cycle energy and GHG emissions of PET recycling: change-oriented effects

被引:69
|
作者
Shen, Li [1 ]
Nieuwlaar, Evert [1 ]
Worrell, Ernst [2 ]
Patel, Martin K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Fac Sci, Dept Sci Technol & Soc, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, Dept Innovat & Environm Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
关键词
Bio-based PET; Change-oriented; LCA; PET; Recycling; Open-loop; Energy; Global warming; Packaging; ASSESSMENT LCA; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-011-0296-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The demand of PET bottles has increased rapidly in the past decades. The purpose of this study is to understand the environmental impact of PET recycling system, in which used bottles are recycled into both fibre and bottles, and to compare the recycling system with single-use PET. Consequential LCA modelling was applied to understand four change-oriented effects for the recycling system. These include the effect of multiple-recycling trips, the effect of changing the share of recycled PET pellets used to make bottles or fibre, the effect of changing the reference system and the effect of introducing bio-based PET. The functional unit of the baseline case was determined as 350 kg of bottles and 650 kg of fibre based on the current market demand of PET. The system boundary is cradle to grave excluding the use phase. We applied the "system expansion" method to open-loop recycling. The analysis compares the baseline recycling system, where PET is recycled once, with the reference system, where PET is not recycled. The environmental impacts assessed are non-renewable energy use and global warming. The baseline recycling system reduces both impacts by 20% when compared to the reference system. Multiple-recycling trips can maximally reduce the impacts by 26% but the additional savings are negligible after three recycling trips. Bottle-to-fibre recycling offers more impact reduction than bottle-to-bottle recycling when more fibre is needed than bottles in a functional unit. The maximal impact reduction of 25% can be achieved when all recycled PET pellets are used to make fibre. If the functional unit is reversed, i.e. changed to 650 kg of bottles and 350 kg of fibre, 30% of the impact reduction can be achieved. Both impacts can be further reduced when the quantity of the recycled PET is maximised. The bio-based PET recycling system, offers at least 36% impact reduction, has the lowest impact among all systems studied. The sensitivity analyses show that the recycled PET content in a recycled bottle is not influential to the overall environmental performance. All PET recycling systems in this study show important impact reduction compared to the reference system. The impact savings are around 20-30% depends on the configurations of the recycling system. We conclude that the system's environmental impact can be optimised by maximising the amount of recycled PET in the system and by using bio-based polymers.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 536
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle energy and GHG emissions of PET recycling: change-oriented effects
    Li Shen
    Evert Nieuwlaar
    Ernst Worrell
    Martin K. Patel
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2011, 16 : 522 - 536
  • [2] Life cycle GHG emissions for FCVS in Japan
    Heffelfinger, B
    GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS I AND II, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 931 - 936
  • [3] Comparing life cycle energy and GHG emissions of bio-based PET, recycled PET, PLA, and man-made cellulosics
    Shen, Li
    Worrell, Ernst
    Patel, Martin K
    Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 2012, 6 (06) : 625 - 639
  • [4] Comparing life cycle energy and GHG emissions of bio-based PET, recycled PET, PLA, and man-made cellulosics
    Shen, Li
    Worrell, Ernst
    Patel, Martin K.
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2012, 6 (06): : 625 - 639
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use
    Seabra, Joaquim E. A.
    Macedo, Isaias C.
    Chum, Helena L.
    Faroni, Carlos E.
    Sarto, Celso A.
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2011, 5 (05): : 519 - 532
  • [6] LIFE CYCLE ENERGY USAGE AND GHG EMISSIONS STUDY OF A SUGAR MILL IN INDIA
    Chauhan, Manish Kumar
    Varun
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (01): : 71 - 79
  • [7] Life-cycle analysis of energy consumption and GHG emissions of aluminium production in China
    Peng, Tianduo
    Ou, Xunmin
    Yan, Xiaoyu
    Wang, Gehua
    INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS FOR ENERGY TRANSITIONS, 2019, 158 : 3937 - 3943
  • [8] Designing residential energy systems considering prospective costs and life cycle GHG emissions
    Terlouw, Tom
    AlSkaif, Tarek
    Bauer, Christian
    Mazzotti, Marco
    McKenna, Russell
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 331
  • [9] Life-cycle energy use and GHG emissions of waste television treatment system in China
    Song, Xiaolong
    Zhang, Chenglong
    Yuan, Wenyi
    Yang, Dong
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2018, 128 : 470 - 478
  • [10] Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand
    Viriyaroj, Bergpob
    Kuittinen, Matti
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    BUILDINGS & CITIES, 2024, 5 (01): : 247 - 267