Histologic Characterization of Acellular Dermal Matrices in a Porcine Model of Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction

被引:3
|
作者
Carruthers, Christopher A. [1 ,2 ]
Dearth, Christopher L. [2 ,3 ]
Reing, Janet E. [2 ]
Kramer, Caroline R. [2 ]
Gagne, Darcy H. [4 ]
Crapo, Peter M. [4 ]
Garcia, Onelio, Jr. [5 ]
Badhwar, Amit [4 ]
Scott, Jeffrey R. [4 ,6 ]
Badylak, Stephen F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, McGowan Inst Regenerat Med, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
[4] CR Bard Inc Davol, Providence, RI USA
[5] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Div Plast Surg, Miami, FL 33136 USA
[6] Brown Univ, Dept Mol Pharmacol Physiol & Biotechnol, Providence, RI 02912 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
XENOGENEIC EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX; BIOLOGIC SCAFFOLD; IN-VITRO; MACROPHAGE PHENOTYPE; STEM-CELLS; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; INDUCTIVE SCAFFOLD; DIGIT AMPUTATION; ADIPOSE-TISSUE; ALLODERM;
D O I
10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0095
中图分类号
Q813 [细胞工程];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) have been commonly used in expander-based breast reconstruction to provide inferolateral prosthesis coverage. Although the clinical performance of these biologic scaffold materials varies depending on a number of factors, an in-depth systematic characterization of the host response is yet to be performed. The present study evaluates the biochemical composition and structure of two ADMs, AlloDerm((R)) Regenerative Tissue Matrix and AlloMax (TM) Surgical Graft, and provides a comprehensive spatiotemporal characterization in a porcine model of tissue expander breast reconstruction. Methods: Each ADM was characterized with regard to thickness, permeability, donor nucleic acid content, (residual double-stranded DNA [dsDNA]), and growth factors (basic fibroblast growth factor [bFGF], vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF], and transforming growth factor-beta 1 [TGF-beta 1]). Cytocompatibility was evaluated by in vitro cell culture on the ADMs. The host response was evaluated at 4 and 12 weeks at various locations within the ADMs using established metrics of the inflammatory and tissue remodeling response: cell infiltration, multinucleate giant cell formation, extent of ADM remodeling, and neovascularization. Results: AlloMax incorporated more readily with surrounding host tissue as measured by earlier and greater cell infiltration, fewer foreign body giant cells, and faster remodeling of ADM. These findings correlated with the in vitro composition and cytocompatibility analysis, which showed AlloMax to more readily support in vitro cell growth. Conclusions: AlloMax and AlloDerm demonstrated distinct remodeling characteristics in a porcine model of tissue expander breast reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 44
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Histologic Analysis of Fetal Bovine Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
    Gaster, Richard S.
    Berger, Aaron J.
    Monica, Stefanie D.
    Sweeney, Robert T.
    Endress, Ryan
    Lee, Gordon K.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 70 (04) : 447 - 453
  • [2] Dermal Autograft Using Donor Breast as Alternative to Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction A Comparative Review
    North, William Darden
    Kubajak, Christopher S.
    St. Martin, Brad
    Rinker, Brian
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 78 : S282 - S285
  • [3] Dermal autografts as a substitute for acellular dermal matrices (ADM) in tissue expander breast reconstruction: A prospective comparative study
    Lynch, Michael P.
    Chung, Michael T.
    Rinker, Brian D.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2013, 66 (11): : 1534 - 1542
  • [4] A Comparative Analysis of Cryopreserved Versus Prehydrated Human Acellular Dermal Matrices in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction
    Seth, Akhil K.
    Persing, Scott
    Connor, Caitlin M.
    Davila, Armando
    Hirsch, Elliot
    Fine, Neil A.
    Kim, John Y. S.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2013, 70 (06) : 632 - 635
  • [5] Bacterial Biofilm on Tissue Expander and Acellular Dermal Graft After Breast Reconstruction
    Kathju, Avni
    Nistico, Laura
    Stoodley, Paul
    SURGICAL INFECTIONS, 2024, 25 (08) : 632 - 635
  • [6] Acellular Dermal Matrix Slings in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction Are There Substantial Benefits?
    Collis, George N.
    TerKonda, Sarvam P.
    Waldorf, James C.
    Perdikis, Galen
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 68 (05) : 425 - 428
  • [7] Performance of Human and Porcine Derived Acellular Dermal Matrices in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Long-term Clinicaland Histologic Evaluation
    Gabriel, Allen
    Maxwell, G. Patrick
    O'Rorke, Erin
    Harper, John R.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2024, 45 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [8] The Effect of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use on Complication Rates in Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction
    Lanier, Steven T.
    Wang, Eric D.
    Chen, John J.
    Arora, Balvant P.
    Katz, Steven M.
    Gelfand, Mark A.
    Khan, Sami U.
    Dagum, Alexander B.
    Bui, Duc T.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2010, 64 (05) : 674 - 678
  • [9] Aesthetic Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix in Tissue Expander/Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
    Forsberg, Clay G.
    Kelly, David A.
    Wood, Benjamin C.
    Mastrangelo, Stephanie L.
    DeFranzo, Anthony J.
    Thompson, James T.
    David, Lisa R.
    Marks, Malcolm W.
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2014, 72 (06) : S116 - S120
  • [10] Tissue expander with acellular dermal matrix for breast reconstruction infected by an unusual pathogen: Candida parapsilosis
    Fox, Paige M.
    Lee, Gordon K.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2012, 65 (10): : E286 - E289