Dynamic assessment and influencing factors analysis of water environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

被引:18
|
作者
Kong, Yang [1 ]
He, Weijun [2 ]
Gao, Xin [3 ]
Yuan, Liang [2 ]
Peng, Qingling [1 ]
Li, Shuqin [1 ]
Zhang, Zhaofang [4 ]
Degefu, Dagmawi Mulugeta [5 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] China Three Gorges Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Yichang 443002, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[4] Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Ctr Int Cooperat Serv, Beijing 100125, Peoples R China
[5] Toronto Metropolitan Univ, Ryerson Univ, Dept Architecture Sci, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Water environmental carrying capacity; Water sustainability; Spatial -temporal analysis; Influencing factors analysis; Yangtze River Economic Belt; OPTIMIZATION; MANAGEMENT; RESOURCES; FOOTPRINT; PROVINCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109214
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Improving water environmental carrying capacity (WECC) is pivotal to support water sustainability and continued economic development. The improvement pathways of WECC based on both subsystem coupling and driving factors have not yet been identified. Therefore, taking the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) as a case study, this paper firstly constructed a set of scientific comprehensive evaluation index system of WECC based on the coupling system of water resources-water environment-society-economy. Secondly, the improved catastrophe progression method was properly introduced to dynamically evaluate the level of provincial WECC from 2010 to 2018. Finally, the coupling coordination degree (CCD) and obstacle factor diagnosis model were creatively combined to identify the main influencing factors of WECC. The main findings were as follows: (1) The WECC of the YREB was generally low at the provincial and subsystem levels without any obvious upward trend. In comparison, the WECC was higher in Shanghai City, Zhejiang Province and the lower reaches of the YREB. (2) The CCD among the four subsystems was generally low in the YREB. Meanwhile, there was a significant positive correlation between the CCD and WECC in each provincial area, and thus the low CCD was a vital reason for the low WECC in the YREB. (3) Overall, the economic subsystem had the highest restriction on WECC improvement in the YREB, while that of the water resources subsystem had the least. Seen from the mean, the top five obstacle factors of WECC were proportion of ecological environment water consumption, urbanization rate, per capita GDP, proportion of tertiary industry and water consumption per unit of GDP respectively. Furthermore, the rankings of main obstacle factors showed a certain time fluctuation. In general, it could be found out that the CCD of subsystems and main obstacle factors should be focused on simultaneously when improving regional WECC. Additionally, this study has provided a new analytical framework for identifying the pathways of improving WECC, which is also applicable to find the improvement pathways for stability and safety of other complex systems.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement and analysis of water ecological carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Peng Wang
    Hongwei Deng
    Tao Peng
    Zheng Pan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 95507 - 95524
  • [2] Measurement and analysis of water ecological carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Wang, Peng
    Deng, Hongwei
    Peng, Tao
    Pan, Zheng
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (42) : 95507 - 95524
  • [3] The impact of environmental regulation on water resources carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Yi, Ying
    Li, Zhenqiang
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2024, 15 (07) : 3361 - 3376
  • [4] The Environmental Carrying Capacity of Marine Resources in the Offshore Areas of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Song, Shengbang
    Du, Yunwei
    JOURNAL OF COASTAL RESEARCH, 2019, : 14 - 17
  • [5] Assessment on water environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Delta
    Wang, Jin-Nan
    Yu, Lei
    Wan, Jun
    Xu, Yi
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2013, 33 (06): : 1147 - 1151
  • [6] Water Environment Carrying Capacity Assessment of Yangtze River Economic Belt Using Grey Water Footprint Model
    Liu, Peigui
    Yi, Xingyuan
    Feng, Yuan
    Shang, Manting
    Bao, Zhenxin
    WATER SUPPLY, 2021, 21 (08) : 4003 - 4014
  • [7] Analysis of logistics capacity, influencing factors and spatial spillover effect in Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Fanghu, Li
    Yinnan, He
    Biao, Wang
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (05):
  • [8] Green development efficiency measurement and influencing factors analysis in the Yangtze River economic Belt, China
    Peng, Shiyi
    Yu, Yajing
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 162
  • [9] Identifying resource and environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: the perspectives of spatial differences and sustainable development
    Zou, Hui
    Ma, Xiaohua
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 23 (10) : 14775 - 14798
  • [10] Identifying resource and environmental carrying capacity in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China: the perspectives of spatial differences and sustainable development
    Hui Zou
    Xiaohua Ma
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2021, 23 : 14775 - 14798