Intentional artificial grammar learning: When does it work?

被引:8
|
作者
van den Bos, Esther [1 ]
Poletiek, Fenna H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, NL-2300 RB Leiden, Netherlands
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1080/09541440701554474
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Actively searching for the rules of an artificial grammar has often been shown to produce no more knowledge than memorising exemplars without knowing that they have been generated by a grammar. The present study investigated whether this ineffectiveness of intentional learning could be overcome by removing dual task demands and providing participants with more specific instructions. The results only showed a positive effect of learning intentionally for participants specifically instructed to find out which letters are allowed to follow each other. These participants were also unaffected by a salient feature. In contrast, for participants who did not know what kind of structure to expect, intentional learning was not more effective than incidental learning and knowledge acquisition was guided by salience.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 806
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WHEN DOES THE INTENTIONAL STANCE WORK
    DENNETT, DC
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1985, 8 (04) : 763 - 765
  • [2] Intentional control based on familiarity in artificial grammar learning
    Wan, Lulu
    Dienes, Zoltan
    Fu, Xiaolan
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2008, 17 (04) : 1209 - 1218
  • [3] When Does Active Learning Work?
    Evans, Lewis P. G.
    Adams, Niall M.
    Anagnostopoulos, Christoforos
    ADVANCES IN INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS XII, 2013, 8207 : 174 - 185
  • [4] When does cooperative learning "work?" When is it likely to "fail"?
    Bodner, GM
    Grant, ER
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 215 : U175 - U175
  • [5] The role of symmetry and repetition in material when learning implicitly an artificial grammar
    Witt, Arnaud
    Vinter, Annie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 43 (3-4) : 165 - 165
  • [6] Does the artificial grammar learning paradigm involve the acquisition of complex information?
    Meulemans, T
    VanderLinden, M
    PSYCHOLOGICA BELGICA, 1997, 37 (1-2) : 69 - 88
  • [7] Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning
    Esther van den Bos
    Fenna H. Poletiek
    Memory & Cognition, 2008, 36 : 1122 - 1131
  • [8] Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning
    Van Den Bos, Esther
    Poletiek, Fenna H.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (06) : 1122 - 1131
  • [9] When Does Contrastive Visual Representation Learning Work?
    Cole, Elijah
    Yang, Xuan
    Wilber, Kimberly
    Mac Aodha, Oisin
    Belongie, Serge
    2022 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2022), 2022, : 14735 - 14744
  • [10] Artificial grammar learning in pigeons
    Walter T. Herbranson
    Charles P. Shimp
    Learning & Behavior, 2008, 36 : 116 - 137