Migraine Nurses in Primary Care: Costs and Benefits

被引:8
|
作者
van den Berg, Jan S. P. [1 ]
Steiner, Timothy J. [2 ,3 ]
Veenstra, Petra J. L. [4 ]
Kollen, Boudewijn J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Isala, Dept Neurol, POB 10400, NL-8000 GK Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] NTNU Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Neuromed & Movement Sci, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Imperial Coll London, Div Brain Sci, London, England
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurol, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
HEADACHE | 2017年 / 57卷 / 08期
关键词
migraine; burden; disability; management; primary care nurse; cost analysis; HEADACHE DISORDERS; IMPACT; BURDEN; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/head.13098
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective.-We examined the costs and benefits of introducing migraine nurses into primary care. Background.-Migraine is one of the most costly neurological diseases. Methods.-We analyzed data from our earlier nonrandomized cohort study comparing an intervention group of 141 patients, whose care was supported by nurses trained in migraine management, and a control group of 94 patients receiving usual care. Estimates of per-person direct costs were based on nurses' salaries and referrals to neurologists. Indirect costs were estimated as lost productivity, including numbers of days of absenteeism or with <50% productivity at work due to migraine, and notional costs related to lost days of household activities or days of <50% household productivity. Analysis was conducted from the payer's perspective. Results.-After 9 months the direct costs were (sic)281.11 in the control group against (sic)332.23 in the intervention group (mean difference -51.12; 95% CI: -113.20-15.56; P=.134); the indirect costs were (sic)1985.51 in the control group against (sic)1631.75 in the intervention group (mean difference 353.75; 95% CI: -355.53-1029.82; P=.334); and total costs were (sic)2266.62 in the control group, against (sic)1963.99 in the intervention group (mean difference 302.64; 95% CI: -433.46-1001.27; P=.438). When costs attributable to lost household productivity were included, total costs increased to (sic)6076.62 in the control group and (sic)5048.15 in the intervention group (mean difference 1028.47; 95% CI: -590.26-2603.67; P=.219). Conclusion.-Migraine nurses in primary care seemed in this study to increase practice costs but decrease total societal costs. However, it was a nonrandomized study, and the differences did not reach significance. For policy-makers concerned with headache-service organization and delivery, the important messages are that we found no evidence that nurses increased overall costs, and investment in a definitive study would therefore be worthwhile.
引用
收藏
页码:1252 / 1260
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nurses improve migraine management in primary care
    Veenstra, Petra
    Kollen, Boudewijn J.
    de Jong, Gosse
    Baarveld, Frans
    van den Berg, J. S. Peter
    CEPHALALGIA, 2016, 36 (08) : 772 - 778
  • [2] Do nurses improve migraine management in primary care?
    van den Berg, P.
    Kollen, B.
    Veenstra, P.
    de Jong, G.
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2014, 15
  • [3] Health benefits and costs of weight-loss dietary counselling by nurses in primary care: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Cleghorn, Christine L.
    Wilson, Nick
    Nair, Nisha
    Kvizhinadze, Giorgi
    Nghiem, Nhung
    McLeod, Melissa
    Blakely, Tony
    PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2020, 23 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [4] The Costs and Benefits of Hospital Care by Primary Physicians Continuity Counts
    Willett, Lisa L.
    Landefeld, C. Seth
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 177 (12) : 1788 - 1789
  • [5] EHMTI-0346. Do nurses improve migraine management in primary care?
    P van den Berg
    B Kollen
    P Veenstra
    G de Jong
    The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2014, 15
  • [6] An evaluation of a nurse-led ear care service in primary care: benefits and costs
    Fall, M
    Walters, S
    Read, S
    Deverill, M
    Lutman, M
    Milner, P
    Rodgers, R
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1997, 47 (424): : 699 - 703
  • [7] COSTS AND BENEFITS OF COMMUNITY CARE
    FORSTER, DP
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1984, 32 (03): : 103 - 103
  • [8] COSTS AND BENEFITS OF COMMUNITY CARE
    STEEL, DR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE, 1984, 32 (05): : 283 - 283
  • [9] Costs and benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation to COPD patients apply in primary health care
    Resqueti, Vanessa
    de Farias, Catharinne Carvalho
    Portela, Barbara
    Ferreira da Silva, Bruno Henrique
    Melo, Rodrigo
    Dias, Fernando Lavezzo
    Fregonezi, Guilherme
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2013, 42
  • [10] Switching patients with migraine from sumatriptan to other triptans increases primary care costs
    Savani, N
    Martin, A
    Browning, D
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2004, 58 (08) : 758 - 763