Prognostic factors for recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prognostic study

被引:24
|
作者
Fermont, Anouk J. [1 ,2 ]
Wolterbeek, Nienke [1 ]
Wessel, Ronald N. [1 ]
Baeyens, Jean-Pierre [3 ,4 ]
de Bie, Rob A. [5 ]
机构
[1] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[2] Medicort Sports & Orthoped Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Univ Coll Thim van der Laan, Landquart, Switzerland
[5] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Res Sch, Dept Epidemiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
Shoulder; rotator cuff lesion; arthroscopic repair; prognostic factors; quality of life; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; TEARS; DISEASE; INDEX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2015.04.013
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Studies concerning prognostic factors of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair mostly focus on tendon integrity or functional recovery as an outcome. Little is known about how they influence quality of life after surgery. We therefore tried to identify prognostic factors having an impact on quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: This study included 30 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We assessed Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index as primary outcome and RAND-36, Constant-Murley score, and a shoulder hindrance score as secondary outcomes. Patients were repeatedly measured: once preoperatively and 4 times postoperatively. Preoperative range of motion, obesity, fatty infiltration, and cuff retraction were preselected as prognostic factors. Results: Patients were significantly improved at 3 months and 6 months after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. In multiple regression analysis, none of the preselected factors could be identified as a prognostic factor influencing quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (measured with the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index). For the outcome variables RAND-36 (6 months, 1 year) and shoulder hindrance score (1 year), fatty infiltration Goutallier stages 1 and 2 and retraction grades II, III, and IV were significant predictors. Conclusion: Although fatty infiltration and retraction grade predict the RAND-36 and shoulder hindrance score, this study could not support preoperative range of motion, obesity, fatty infiltration, or retraction of the cuff as a prognostic factor for quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. This study shows that if selection of patients is done properly, these factors do not influence a successful outcome. (C) 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1256
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prognostic Factors for Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli
    Assuncao, Jorge Henrique
    Andrade-Silva, Fernando Brandao
    Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio Conforto
    Kiyomoto, Henry Dan
    Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (04)
  • [2] Prognostic Factors for Successful Recovery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Literature Review
    Fermont, Anouk J. M.
    Wolterbeek, Nienke
    Wessel, Ronald N.
    Baeyens, Jean-Pierre
    De Bie, Rob A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2014, 44 (03): : 153 - 163
  • [3] Prognostic factors affecting structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a clinical and histological study
    Wang, Pei Wei
    Jo, Chris Hyunchul
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2023, 26 (01): : 10 - 19
  • [4] Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair
    Maria Valencia Mora
    Diana Morcillo Barrenechea
    Maria Dolores Martín Ríos
    Antonio M. Foruria
    Emilio Calvo
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2017, 25 : 2157 - 2163
  • [5] Clinical outcome and prognostic factors of revision arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair
    Valencia Mora, Maria
    Morcillo Barrenechea, Diana
    Martin Rios, Maria Dolores
    Foruria, Antonio M.
    Calvo, Emilio
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2017, 25 (07) : 2157 - 2163
  • [6] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
    Reggi Pecora, Jose Otavio
    Malavolta, Eduardo Angeli
    Assuncao, Jorge Henrique
    Conforto Gracitelli, Mauro Emilio
    Sobreiro Martins, Joao Paulo
    Ferreira Neto, Arnaldo Amado
    ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2015, 23 (03): : 146 - 149
  • [7] Prognostic factors affecting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: importance of functional recovery by 3 months after surgery
    Yosuke Nakamura
    Masafumi Gotoh
    Yasuhiro Mitsui
    Hidehiro Nakamura
    Hiroki Ohzono
    Takahiro Okawa
    Naoto Shiba
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 13
  • [8] Prognostic factors affecting clinical outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: importance of functional recovery by 3 months after surgery
    Nakamura, Yosuke
    Gotoh, Masafumi
    Mitsui, Yasuhiro
    Nakamura, Hidehiro
    Ohzono, Hiroki
    Okawa, Takahiro
    Shiba, Naoto
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2018, 13
  • [9] Speed of recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Kurowicki, Jennifer
    Berglund, Derek D.
    Momoh, Enesi
    Disla, Shanell
    Horn, Brandon
    Giveans, M. Russell
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (07) : 1271 - 1277
  • [10] Mobility recovery after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
    Gumina, Stefano
    Izzo, Rosanna
    Pintabona, Giovanni
    Candela, Vittorio
    Savastano, Riccardo
    Santilli, Valter
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (01) : 49 - 56