Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening: A simple solution

被引:53
|
作者
Clemens, CJ
Davis, SA
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Pediat, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Moses Cone Hlth Syst, Greensboro, NC USA
[3] Greensboro Area Hlth Educ Ctr, Greensboro, NC USA
关键词
universal newborn hearing screening; screening; false-positive; hearing; audiology; automated auditory brainstem response;
D O I
10.1542/peds.107.3.e29
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives. The false-positive rates of previously reported universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) programs range between 2.5% and 8%. Critics of UNHS programs have claimed that this rate is too high and might lead to a number of the negative effects produced by false-positive screening tests, namely emotional trauma, disease labeling, iatrogenesis from unnecessary testing, and increased expense in terms of time and money. We previously reported, based on some preliminary data, that as many as 80% of newborns who failed the initial hearing screen subsequently passed when they were retested the following day, before being discharged from the hospital. We now present the results of this intervention for our entire UNHS program during a 7-month period. Methods. We analyzed data from 3142 non-neonatal intensive care unit infants screened with an automated auditory brainstem response at the Women's Hospital of Greensboro from November 1, 1999 to May 31, 2000. A protocol was developed wherein all infants who failed the initial UNHS were rescreened with another automated auditory brainstem response before hospital discharge. Data collected included pass/fail rates during the inpatient stay as well as follow-up data and risk factors for congenital hearing loss. Results. Confirmed hearing loss occurred in 8 nonneonatal intensive care unit infants, a rate of 2.5/1000. Eighty percent of newborns who failed the initial hearing screen passed on rescreening before hospital discharge. This produced a false-positive rate of 0.8% and a corresponding positive predictive value of 24%. If inhospital rescreening had not occurred, our false-positive rate and positive predictive value would have been 3.9% and 6.1%, respectively. Conclusions. Our simple intervention of rescreening all infants who failed their initial UNHS before hospital discharge reduced the false-positive rate of UNHS to 0.8%. We suggest that this simple, inexpensive intervention should be instituted for all similar UNHS programs.
引用
收藏
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimizing false-positives in universal newborn hearing screening program
    Srinivasan, HB
    Srinivasan, G
    Lotke, M
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2004, 55 (04) : 593A - 593A
  • [2] Urine Drug Screening Minimizing False-Positives and False-Negatives to Optimize Patient Care
    Schwebach, Alyson
    Ball, Jennifer
    US PHARMACIST, 2016, 41 (08) : 26 - 30
  • [3] Reducing false positives in newborn hearing screening program: How and why
    Lin, Hung-Ching
    Shu, Min-Tsan
    Lee, Kuo-Sheng
    Lin, Huang-Yu
    Lin, Grace
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2007, 28 (06) : 788 - 792
  • [4] The false-positive in universal newborn hearing screening
    Clemens, CJ
    Davis, SA
    Bailey, AR
    PEDIATRICS, 2000, 106 (01) : E7
  • [5] False positives in universal neonatal screening for permanent childhood hearing impairment
    Kennedy, C
    Kimm, L
    Thornton, R
    Davis, A
    LANCET, 2000, 356 (9245): : 1903 - 1904
  • [6] Efficacy of liquid-chromatography and radioimmunoassay in false-positives' drop-off in CAH newborn screening
    Carvalho, Daniel
    Lima-Valassi, Helena
    Alves, Atecla
    Miranda, Mirela
    Rodrigues, Andressa
    Hayashi, Giselle
    Madureira, Guiomar
    Steinmetz, Leandra
    Damiani, Durval
    Mendonca, Berenice
    Bachega, Tania
    HORMONE RESEARCH IN PAEDIATRICS, 2022, 95 (SUPPL 2): : 433 - 433
  • [7] Prenatal screening for Down syndrome: the problem of recurrent false-positives
    Wald, NJ
    Huttly, WJ
    Rudnicka, AR
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2004, 24 (05) : 389 - 392
  • [8] Recurrent false-positives in AFP screening for open neural tube defects
    Wald, NJ
    Huttly, WJ
    Rudnicka, AR
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2004, 24 (12) : 1018 - 1019
  • [9] Universal newborn hearing screening
    Patel, H.
    Feldman, M.
    PAEDIATRICS & CHILD HEALTH, 2011, 16 (05) : 301 - 305
  • [10] Universal newborn hearing screening
    Wrightson, A. Stevens
    AMERICAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2007, 75 (09) : 1349 - 1352