Big-data business models: A critical literature review and multiperspective research framework

被引:69
|
作者
Wiener, Martin [1 ]
Saunders, Carol [2 ]
Marabelli, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Bentley Univ, Informat & Proc Management IPM Dept, 175 Forest St, Waltham, MA 02452 USA
[2] Univ S Florida, Informat Syst Decis Sci ISDS Dept, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
关键词
Big-data business models; business model types; business model dimensions; deployment drivers; challenges; process; value creation; value capture; multiperspective research framework; critical review; DATA ANALYTICS; VALUE CREATION; FIRM PERFORMANCE; CAPTURING VALUE; ETHICAL-ISSUES; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS; STRATEGY; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1177/0268396219896811
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The emergence of "big data" offers organizations unprecedented opportunities to gain and maintain competitive advantage. Trying to exploit the strategic business potential embedded in big data, many organizations have started to renovate their business models or develop new ones, giving rise to the phenomenon of big-data business models. Although big-data business model research is still in its infancy, a significant number of studies on the topic have been published since 2014. We thus suggest it is time to perform a critical review and assessment of the literature at the intersection of business models and big data (analytics), thereby responding to recent calls for further research on and sustained analysis of big-data business models. In particular, our review uses three major criteria (big-data business model types, dimensions, and deployment) to assess the state of the big-data business model literature and identify shortcomings in this literature. On this basis, we derive and discuss five central research perspectives (supply chain, stakeholder, ethics, national, and process), providing guidance for future research and theory development in the area. These perspectives also have practical implications on how to address the current big-data business model deployment gap.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 91
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Big-Data/Analytics Projects Failure: A Literature Review
    Reggio, Gianna
    Astesiano, Egidio
    2020 46TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND ADVANCED APPLICATIONS (SEAA 2020), 2020, : 246 - 255
  • [2] 'Big-Data' in dermatological research
    Kaliyadan, Feroze
    Chatterjee, Kingshuk
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2024, 90 (03): : 342 - 344
  • [3] Big Data and Business Analytic Concepts: A Literature Review Completed Research
    Fernando, Fabiane
    Engel, Tobias
    AMCIS 2018 PROCEEDINGS, 2018,
  • [4] A Descriptive Literature Review and Classification of Business Intelligence and Big Data Research
    Rashid, Ammar
    Khurshid, Muhammad Mahboob
    INTELLIGENT COMPUTING, VOL 1, 2022, 506 : 865 - 879
  • [5] Leveraging big-data for business process analytics
    Vera-Baquero, Alejandro
    Palacios, Ricardo Colomo
    Stantchev, Vladimir
    Molloy, Owen
    LEARNING ORGANIZATION, 2015, 22 (04): : 215 - 228
  • [6] ARE YOU READY FOR BIG DATA? GOVERNANCE IN BIG-DATA RESEARCH
    Scheepers, Floortje E.
    Deschamps, Peter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 55 (10): : S309 - S309
  • [7] A big-data processing framework for uncertainties in transportation data
    Yang, Jie
    Ma, Jun
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), 2015,
  • [8] Big data integration with business processes: a literature review
    Wamba, Samuel Fosso
    Mishra, Deepa
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2017, 23 (03) : 477 - 492
  • [9] A systematic review of the literature on agri-food business models: critical review and research agenda
    Miranda, F. Javier
    Garcia-Gallego, Jose Manuel
    Chamorro-Mera, Antonio
    Valero-Amaro, Victor
    Rubio, Sergio
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2023, : 4498 - 4517
  • [10] Qualitative Research Ethics in the Big-Data Era
    Glenna, Leland
    Hesse, Arielle
    Hinrichs, Clare
    Chiles, Robert
    Sachs, Carolyn
    AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2019, 63 (05) : 555 - 559