Intrapartum prophylaxis against Group B Streptococcus infection - own experience

被引:0
|
作者
Kociszewska-Najman, Bozena [1 ,2 ]
Oslislo, Anna [3 ]
Szymusik, Iwona [2 ,4 ]
Pietrzak, Bronislawa [2 ,4 ]
Jabiry-Zieniewicz, Zoulikha [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] WUM, Oddzial Neonatol, PL-02015 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Med, Katedra & Klin Poloznictwa & Ginekol 1, PL-02015 Warsaw, Poland
[3] Wyzsza Szkola Nauk Stosowanych, Wydzial Opieki Zdrowotnej, Ruda Slaska, Poland
[4] Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Med, Katedra & Klin Poloznictwa & Ginekol 1, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Group B Streptococcus; intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP); early onset CBS disease (EOD); EARLY-ONSET SEPSIS; UNITED-STATES; DISEASE; PREVENTION; RESISTANCE; STRATEGY; TRENDS; ERA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Group B Streptococcus (GBS) infection is a leading cause of neonatal complications. Objectives: The aim of the following work was to assess the efficacy of the intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) of the GBS infection, together with the diagnostic and therapeutic management of the newborn, based on the type and frequency of neonatal complications in the children of GBS carriers. Material and methods: 2212 patients, who gave birth at the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical University of Warsaw, between January 2007 and March 2008, were included in the study In accordance with current recommendations, all patients were screened for GBS colonization and carriers were qualified for IAP. In the end, the study group consisted of 250 GBS-positive parturients and their children (253). Retrospective analysis of the chosen variables and statistical analysis were performed. Results: GBS colonization rate in the studied population reached 11.4%. 199 parturients were qualified for IAP (79.56% of 250 women). Optimal chemoprophylaxis was administered in 87.9% of GBS carriers. Intrauterine infection was diagnosed in 13.04% of 253 newborns. In 2 cases (0.8%) GBS was the etiological factor of the infection. The neonatal infection rate was significantly lower among children of GBS-positive mothers who received IAP in comparison to those not qualified for prophylaxis (11.05% vs. 21.56%; p=0.036). The rate of intrauterine infection was also lower among newborns of mothers who had received prophylaxis with ampicillin in comparison to macrolides administration (8.2% vs. 37.5%; p=0.001). Conclusions: Optimal intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis of GBS infection in carriers does not eliminate GBS-related neonatal complications. Intrapartum penicillin administration seems to be more efficient than macrolides administration in GBS infection prophylaxis.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 917
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Duration of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus
    Cate, Jennifer
    Illuzzi, Jessica Lee
    Cayton, Colby
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 135 : 10S - 10S
  • [2] Risk factors for inadequate intrapartum prophylaxis for group B streptococcus
    Illuzzi, JL
    Lee, MJ
    Hamar, BD
    Bracken, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : S190 - S190
  • [3] Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus and risks of unnecessary antibiotics
    Berardi, Alberto
    Ferrari, Fabrizio
    Facchinetti, Fabio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) : 480 - 480
  • [4] Vaginal group B streptococcus status during intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis
    Scasso, Santiago
    Laufer, Joel
    Rodriguez, Grisel
    Alonso, Justo G.
    Sosa, Claudio G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2015, 129 (01) : 9 - 12
  • [5] The usefulness of the universal culture-based screening and the efficacy of intrapartum prophylaxis of group B Streptococcus infection
    Szymusik, Iwona
    Kosinska-Kaczynska, Katarzyna
    Krolik, Andrzej
    Skurnowicz, Magdalena
    Pietrzak, Bronislawa
    Wielgos, Miroslaw
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (09): : 968 - 970
  • [6] <underline/>Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for group B Streptococcus: what exactly is adequate?
    Coggins, Sarah A.
    Puopolo, Karen M.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2024,
  • [7] Intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis for Group B Streptococcus and risks of unnecessary antibiotics REPLY
    Turrentine, Mark
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 212 (03) : 408 - 409
  • [8] Appropriateness of Intrapartum Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Neonatal Group B Streptococcus Disease
    Bianco, Aida
    Larosa, Elisabetta
    Pileggi, Claudia
    Pavia, Maria
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11):
  • [9] Intrapartum Group B Streptococcus Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Penicillin Allergic Pregnant Women
    Desravines, Nerlyne
    Venkatesh, Kartik
    Hopkins, Austin Mitchell
    Grant, Megan
    McGuire, Colleen
    Boggess, Kim A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 133 : 136S - 136S
  • [10] Intrapartum Group B Streptococcus Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Penicillin Allergic Pregnant Women
    Desravines, Nerlyne
    Venkatesh, Kartik K.
    Hopkins, Austin
    Waldron, Amie
    Grant, Megan
    McGuire, Colleen
    Boggess, Kim A.
    AJP REPORTS, 2019, 9 (03): : e238 - e243