The influence of laboratory-induced MELD score differences on liver allocation: more reality than myth

被引:10
|
作者
Schouten, J. N. [1 ]
Francque, S. [1 ]
Van Vlierberghe, H. [2 ]
Colle, I. [2 ]
Nevens, F. [3 ]
Delwaide, J. [4 ]
Adler, M. [5 ]
Starkel, P. [6 ]
Ysebaert, D. [1 ]
Gadisseur, A. [7 ]
De Winter, B. [8 ]
Smits, J. M. [9 ]
Rahmel, A. [9 ]
Michielsen, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Hosp Ghent, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Hepatol, Louvain, Belgium
[4] Univ Hosp Liege, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Liege, Belgium
[5] Erasme Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[6] St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Brussels, Belgium
[7] Univ Antwerp Hosp, Dept Hematol, Antwerp, Belgium
[8] Univ Antwerp, Lab Expt Med & Paediat, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[9] Eurotransplant Int Fdn, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
allocation; bilirubin; creatinine; international normalized ratio; liver transplantation; MELD score; INTERNATIONAL NORMALIZED RATIO; DISEASE MELD; PROTHROMBIN TIME; CIRRHOSIS INRLIVER; MODEL; SURVIVAL; TRANSPLANTATION; VARIABILITY; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01538.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Liver allocation in Eurotransplant (ET) is based on the MELD score. Interlaboratory MELD score differences in INR and creatinine determination have been reported. The clinical implication of this observation has not been demonstrated. Methods: MELD scores were calculated in 66 patients with liver cirrhosis using bilirubin, creatinine, and INR analyzed in six liver transplant centers. Based on allocation results of ET, patients transplanted from December 2006 to June 2007 were divided according to MELD score in four groups. For each group, the influence of the match MELD on the probability of receiving a transplant was studied (Cox proportional hazards model). Results: Laboratory-dependent significant differences in MELD score were demonstrated. Cox proportional hazards model showed a significant association between MELD score and the probability of organ allocation. The unadjusted hazard ratio for receiving a liver transplant was significantly different between group 2 and group 4 (group 2: MELD 19-24; group 4: MELD > 30). Conclusion: Laboratory-dependent significant differences in MELD score were observed between the six transplant centers. We demonstrated a significant association between the MELD score and the probability of organ allocation. The observed interlaboratory variation might yield a significant difference in organ allocation in patients with high MELD scores.
引用
收藏
页码:E62 / E70
页数:9
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Impact of Laboratory Variability On Liver Graft Allocation System Using MELD Score.
    Yassein, T.
    Abd el Razek, W.
    Waked, I.
    Elfert, A.
    Tanaka, K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 731 - 731
  • [2] Impact of Laboratory Variability On Liver Graft Allocation System Using MELD Score.
    Yassein, T.
    Abd el Razek, W.
    Waked, I.
    Elfert, A.
    Tanaka, K.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 98 : 731 - 731
  • [3] Implementation of a liver allocation system based on meld score in three transplant centers of the same city. Can the score differences be solved?
    Xiol, Xavier
    Gines, Pere
    Castells, Lluis
    Ribalta, Alba
    Twose, Jorge
    Ventura, Clara
    Carles Reverter, Joan
    Fuentes, Xavier
    Deulofeu, Roser
    HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (04) : 489A - 489A
  • [4] COMPARISON BETWEEN CADAVERIC WHOLE LIVER AND PARTIAL LIVER TRANSPLANTATION IN HIGH RISK PATIENTS WITH MELD SCORE MORE THAN 40
    Ahn, Chulsoo
    Lee, SungGyu
    Hwang, Shin
    Kim, Kihun
    Moon, Deokbog
    Ha, Tae-Yong
    Song, Giwon
    Jung, DongHwan
    Park, GilChun
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 31 - 31
  • [5] Comparison between Cadaveric Whole Liver and Live Donor Partial Liver Transplantation in High Risk Patients with MELD Score more than 40
    Ahn, Chul Soo
    Hwang, Shin
    Kim, Ki Hun
    Moon, Deok Bok
    Ha, Tae Yong
    Song, Gi Won
    Jung, Dong Hwan
    Park, Gil Chun
    Lee, Sung Gyu
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 : S877 - S877
  • [6] Comparison between Cadaveric Whole Liver Graft and Live Donor Partial Liver Graft Transplantation in High Risk Patients with MELD Score More than 40
    Ahn, C. S.
    Hwang, S.
    Moon, D. B.
    Ha, T. Y.
    Song, G. W.
    Jung, G. H.
    Park, G. C.
    Lee, S. G.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 101 (05) : 157 - 157
  • [7] Handgrip strength adds more prognostic value to the MELD score than imaging-based measures of muscle mass in men awaiting liver transplantation
    Sinclair, Marie
    Chapman, Brooke
    Hoermann, Rudolf
    Testro, Adam
    Scodellaro, Thomas
    Hey, Penelope
    Gow, Paul
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 70 (01) : E103 - E103
  • [8] THE CLIF-CONSORTIUM SCORE PREDICTS MORTALITY MORE ACCURATELY THAN THE MELD AND MELD-SODIUM SCORES IN PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED WITH DECOMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS WITH AND WITHOUT ACUTE-ON-CHRONIC-LIVER FAILURE (ACLF)
    Pavesi, M.
    Jalan, R.
    Amoros, A.
    Moreau, R.
    Gines, P.
    Durand, F.
    Angeli, P.
    Caraceni, P.
    Rodriguez, E.
    Agarwarl, B.
    Hopf, C.
    Alessandria, C.
    Solis-Munoz, P.
    Laleman, W.
    Trebicka, J.
    Saliba, F.
    Zeuzem, S.
    Albillos, A.
    Gustot, T.
    Mookerjee, R.
    Elkrief, L.
    Benten, D.
    Montero, J. L.
    Catalina, M. V.
    Concepcion, M.
    Cordoba, J.
    McCormick, A.
    Stauber, R.
    Vogel, W.
    De Gottardi, A.
    Peck-Radosavljevic, M.
    van Vlierberghe, H.
    Sperl, J.
    Groenbaek, H.
    Mortensen, C.
    Coenraad, M. J.
    Morando, F.
    Domenicali, M.
    Gerbes, A.
    Risso, A.
    Garcia, E.
    Deulofeu, C.
    Bernardi, M.
    Arroyo, V.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 58 : S568 - S569