Prostate boundary segmentation from 3D ultrasound images

被引:69
|
作者
Hu, N
Downey, DB
Fenster, A
Ladak, HM
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON N6H 5C1, Canada
[2] John P Robarts Res Inst, Imaging Res Labs, London, ON N6H 5C1, Canada
[3] London Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Radiol, London, ON N6H 5C1, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, London, ON N6H 5C1, Canada
关键词
segmentation; three-dimensional ultrasound image; initialization; deformation; mesh;
D O I
10.1118/1.1586267
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Segmenting, or outlining the prostate boundary is an important task in the management of patients with prostate cancer. In this paper, an algorithm is described for semiautomatic segmentation of the prostate from 3D ultrasound images. The algorithm uses model-based initialization and mesh refinement using an efficient deformable model. Initialization requires the user to select only six points from which the outline of the prostate is estimated using shape information. The estimated outline is then automatically deformed to better fit the prostate boundary. An editing tool allows the user to edit the boundary in problematic regions and then deform the model again to improve the final results. The algorithm requires less than 1 min on a Pentium III 400 MHz PC. The accuracy of the algorithm was assessed by comparing the algorithm results, obtained from both local and global analysis, to the manual segmentations on six prostates. The local difference was mapped on the surface of the algorithm boundary to produce a visual representation. Global error analysis showed that the average difference between manual and algorithm boundaries was -0.20+/-0.28 mm, the average absolute difference was 1.19+/-0.14 mm, the average maximum difference was 7.01+/-1.04 mm, and the average volume difference was 7.16%+/-3.45%. Variability in manual and algorithm segmentation was also assessed: Visual representations of local variability were generated by mapping variability on the segmentation mesh. The mean variability in manual segmentation was 0.98 mm and in algorithm segmentation was 0.63 min and the differences of about 51.5% of the points comprising the average algorithm boundary are insignificant (Pless than or equal to0.01) to the manual average boundary. (C) 2003 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1648 / 1659
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of algorithms for segmentation of the prostate boundary from 3D ultrasound images
    Ladak, HM
    Ding, MY
    Wang, YQ
    Hu, N
    Downey, DB
    Fenster, A
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3, 2004, 5370 : 1403 - 1410
  • [2] Prostate surface segmentation from 3D ultrasound images
    Hu, N
    Downey, DB
    Fenster, A
    Ladak, HM
    2002 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIOMEDICAL IMAGING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 613 - 616
  • [3] Prostate boundary segmentation from 2D ultrasound images
    Ladak, HM
    Mao, F
    Wang, YQ
    Downey, DB
    Steinman, DA
    Fenster, A
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (08) : 1777 - 1788
  • [4] 3D Segmentation of Prostate Ultrasound images Using Wavelet Transform
    Akbari, Hamed
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    Halig, Luma V.
    Fei, Baowei
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2011: IMAGE PROCESSING, 2011, 7962
  • [5] Prostate boundary segmentation from ultrasound images using 2D active shape models: Optimisation and extension to 3D
    Hodge, Adam C.
    Fenster, Aaron
    Downey, Donal B.
    Ladak, Hanif M.
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2006, 84 (2-3) : 99 - 113
  • [6] 3D reconstruction of prostate from ultrasound images
    CrivianuGaita, D
    Miclea, F
    Gaspar, A
    Margineatu, D
    Holban, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 1997, 45 (1-2) : 43 - 51
  • [7] Random Walk Based Segmentation for the Prostate on 3D Transrectal Ultrasound Images
    Ma, Ling
    Guo, Rongrong
    Tian, Zhiqiang
    Venkataraman, Rajesh
    Sarkar, Saradwata
    Liu, Xiabi
    Nieh, Peter T.
    Master, Viraj V.
    Schuster, David M.
    Fei, Baowei
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2016, 9786
  • [8] Random walk based segmentation for the prostate on 3D transrectal ultrasound images
    Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta
    GA, United States
    不详
    不详
    CA, United States
    不详
    GA, United States
    不详
    GA, United States
    不详
    GA, United States
    Progr. Biomed. Opt. Imaging Proc. SPIE,
  • [9] 3D Prostate Segmentation in Ultrasound Images Based on Tapered and Deformed Ellipsoids
    Mahdavi, Seyedeh Sara
    Morris, William J.
    Spadinger, Ingrid
    Chng, Nick
    Goksel, Orcun
    Salcudean, Septimiu E.
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2009, PT II, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5762 : 960 - +
  • [10] Direct 3D segmentation of carotid plaques from 3D ultrasound images
    Cheng, Jieyu
    Yu, Yanyan
    Chiu, Bernard
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2016 IEEE BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (BIOCAS), 2016, : 123 - 126