Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia does not increase the risk of postoperative delirium compared to patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study

被引:4
|
作者
Miyoshi, Hirotsugu [1 ]
Nakamura, Ryuji [1 ]
Noda, Yuko [1 ]
Yokomi, Hiroshi [1 ]
Kamiya, Satoshi [1 ]
Morio, Atsushi [1 ]
Watanabe, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Narasaki, Soushi [1 ]
Toyota, Yukari [1 ]
Saeki, Noboru [1 ]
Hamada, Hiroshi [2 ]
Tsutsumi, Yasuo M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Hiroshima, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Palliat Med, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA); postoperative delirium (POD); epidural analgesia; opioid; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT; FENTANYL INFUSIONS; PAIN RELIEF; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; MORPHINE;
D O I
10.21037/apm-21-1084
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It is unclear whether the doses of opioids and the routes of administration used for postoperative analgesic management are associated with delirium. We aimed to compare the incidence of postoperative delirium (POD) between intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) and patientcontrolled epidural analgesia (PCEA) in patients who underwent postoperative analgesic management using opioids. Methods: We retrospectively investigated surgical patients (n=3,324) who received patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Morphine was used for IVPCA, and fentanyl and ropivacaine were used for PCEA. The patients' background characteristics, perioperative management, presence of POD, and postoperative analgesia technique after IVPCA (n=1,184) or PCEA (n=2,140) were assessed. We divided the patients into IVPCA and PCEA groups and compared the incidence of POD by propensity score matching. We used the independent t-test for comparisons between the groups, and P<0.05 as considered as statistically significant. Results: POD was noted in a total of 125 patients (3.8%); 55 patients (4.6%) with IVPCA and 70 patients (3.3%) with PCEA (P=0.046). There was no statistically significant difference in cumulative opioid usage up to postoperative day 2 (in mg) between patients with and without POD (POD 62.7 +/- 39.8 vs. non-POD 48.9 +/- 50.3, P=0.10). After propensity score matching, 1,156 patients with similar baseline characteristics were selected. POD was noted in 22 of 578 patients (3.8%) in the IVPCA group and 30 of 578 patients (5.2%) in the PCEA group, with no difference between the two groups (P=0.256). On the other hand, opioid usage was higher in the IVPCA group than in the PCEA group (P<0.001). Conclusions: There was no difference in the incidence of POD between morphine IVPCA and fentanyl PCEA when the patient characteristics were matched using propensity score matching. POD occurs regardless of the route and dose of opioid administration.
引用
收藏
页码:10160 / 10169
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Labor analgesia: Comparison of epidural patient-controlled analgesia and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia
    Sugur, Tayfun
    Kizilates, Esra
    Kizilates, Ali
    Inanoglu, Kerem
    Karsli, Bilge
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2020, 32 (01): : 8 - 18
  • [2] Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia - risk factor for postoperative delirium
    Takeuchi, M.
    Miyoshi, H.
    Nakamura, R.
    Kamiya, S.
    Hamada, H.
    Kawamoto, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2014, 31 : 236 - 237
  • [3] Postoperative analgesia after major spine surgery:: Patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia
    Schenk, Michael R.
    Putzier, Michael
    Kuegler, Bjoern
    Tohtz, Stephan
    Voigt, Kristina
    Schink, Tania
    Kox, Wolfgang J.
    Spies, Claudia
    Volk, Thomas
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 103 (05): : 1311 - 1317
  • [4] Clinical study on the effect of remifentanil patient-controlled intravenous labor analgesia compared to patient-controlled epidural labor analgesia
    Li, Haibing
    Li, Hui
    Yu, Yibing
    Lu, Yan
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2023, 94 (07) : 544 - 551
  • [5] Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Hwang, Boo Young
    Kwon, Jae Young
    Jeon, So Eun
    Kim, Eun Soo
    Kim, Hyae Jin
    Lee, Hyeon Jeong
    An, Jihye
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2018, 31 (03): : 191 - 198
  • [6] Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using pethidine or fentanyl
    Kee, WDN
    Lam, KK
    Chen, PP
    Gin, T
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1997, 25 (02) : 126 - 132
  • [7] COMPARISON OF INTRAVENOUS AND EPIDURAL CLONIDINE FOR POSTOPERATIVE PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA
    BERNARD, JM
    KICK, O
    BONNET, F
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (04): : 706 - 712
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia alone versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with acetaminophen after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Ebara, Gen
    Sakuramoto, Shinichi
    Matsui, Kazuaki
    Nishibeppu, Keiji
    Fujita, Shouhei
    Fujihata, Shiro
    Oya, Shuichiro
    Lee, Seigi
    Miyawaki, Yutaka
    Sugita, Hirofumi
    Sato, Hiroshi
    Yamashita, Keishi
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (11): : 8245 - 8253
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled thoracic epidural analgesia alone versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with acetaminophen after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Gen Ebara
    Shinichi Sakuramoto
    Kazuaki Matsui
    Keiji Nishibeppu
    Shouhei Fujita
    Shiro Fujihata
    Shuichiro Oya
    Seigi Lee
    Yutaka Miyawaki
    Hirofumi Sugita
    Hiroshi Sato
    Keishi Yamashita
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 8245 - 8253
  • [10] EQUIVALENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE ANALGESIA WITH PATIENT-CONTROLLED INTRAVENOUS OR EPIDURAL ALFENTANIL
    CHAUVIN, M
    HONGNAT, JM
    MOURGEON, E
    LEBRAULT, C
    BELLENFANT, F
    ALFONSI, P
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1993, 76 (06): : 1251 - 1258