Eliminating of the "Suspicious for High Grade Urothelial Carcinoma" (SHGUC) Category Results in Unacceptable Loss of Sensitivity for High Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (HGUC) Diagnosis in Urinary Tract Cytology (UTCy)

被引：0

作者：

McCroskey, Zulfia ^{[1
]}

Chatt, Grazina ^{[1
]}

Eshraghi, Reza ^{[1
]}

Bahar, Burak ^{[1
]}

Wojcik, Eva ^{[1
]}

Pambuccian, Stefan ^{[1
]}

Barkan, Guliz ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Loyola Univ, Med Ctr, Maywood, IL 60153 USA

来源：

MODERN PATHOLOGY | 2015年 / 28卷

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R36 [病理学];

学科分类号：

100104 ;

摘要：

384

引用

页码：98A / 99A

页数：2

共 50 条

[1] Eliminating of the "Suspicious for High Grade Urothelial Carcinoma" (SHGUC) Category Results in Unacceptable Loss of Sensitivity for High Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (HGUC) Diagnosis in Urinary Tract Cytology (UTCy)
McCroskey, Zulfia
Chad, Grazina
Eshraghi, Reza
Bahar, Burak
Wojcik, Eva
Pambuccian, Stefan
Barkan, Guliz
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 98A - 99A
[2] What Is the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of the Diagnosis Idquo] Suspicious for High Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (SHGUC)" in Urinary Tract Cytology (UTCy)?
Joudi, Anthony
Pambuccian, Stefan
Wojcik, Eva
Barkan, Guliz
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 94A - 94A
[3] What Is the Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of the Diagnosis Idquo] Suspicious for High Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (SHGUC)" in UrinaryTract Cytology (UTCy)?
Joudi, Anthony
Pambuccian, Stefan
Wojcik, Eva
Barkan, Guliz
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 94A - 94A
[4] Reliability of the Distinction Between Polyomavirus Infection (PyV) and High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (HGUC) in Urinary Tract Cytopathology (UTCy)
Eshraghi, Reza
Pambuccian, Stefan
Chatt, Grazina
McCroskey, Zulfia
Wojcik, Eva
Barkan, Guliz
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2015, 28 : 88A - 88A
[5] Reliability of the Distinction Between Polyomavirus Infection (PyV) and High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (HGUC) in Urinary Tract Cytopathology (UTCy)
Eshraghi, Reza
Pambuccian, Stefan
Chatt, Grazina
McCroskey, Zulfia
Wojcik, Eva
Barkan, Guliz
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2015, 95 : 88A - 88A
[6] Should "Suspicious for High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma" and "Positive for High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma" Remain Separate Categories?
Luan Nguyen
Bose, Shikha
Bakkar, Rania
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2020, 33 (SUPPL 2) : 402 - 402
[7] Should "suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" and "positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma" remain separate categories?
Nguyen, Luan
Nilforoushan, Neshat
Krane, Jeffrey F.
Bose, Shikha
Bakkar, Rania
CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2021, 129 (02) : 156 - 163
[8] Should "Suspicious for High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma" and "Positive for High-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma" Remain Separate Categories?
Luan Nguyen
Bose, Shikha
Bakkar, Rania
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2020, 100 (SUPPL 1) : 402 - 402
[9] Atypical Urothelial Cells (AUC) Diagnosis Rates and AUC/High Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (AUC/HGUC) Ratios Vary in Different Urinary Cytology (UCy) Specimen Types
Pambuccian, Stefan
Barkan, Guliz
Wojcik, Eva M.
LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 97 : 111A - 111A
[10] Atypical Urothelial Cells (AUC) Diagnosis Rates and AUC/High Grade Urothelial Carcinoma (AUC/HGUC) Ratios Vary in Different Urinary Cytology (UCy) Specimen Types
Pambuccian, Stefan
Barkan, Guliz
Wojcik, Eva M.
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2017, 30 : 111A - 111A

← 1 2 3 4 5 →