In vivo comparison of CT and DXA methods of proximal femur cross-sectional geometry measurement using HSA

被引：0
|
作者：
Beek, T. J. [1 ]
Brown, J. K. [2 ]
Gustafsson, S. [3 ]
Zhu, K. [3 ]
Dick, I. [4 ]
Hentzell, S. [5 ]
Low, V. H. [6 ]
Wilson, K. E. [7 ]
Prince, R. L. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD 6009 USA
[2] Mindways Software Inc, Austin, TX 6009 USA
[3] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia
[5] Univ Western Australia, Crawley, WA, Australia
[6] Sir Charles Gairdner Hosp, Nedlands, WA, Australia
[7] Holog Inc, Bedford, MA USA
来源：
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH | 2007年 / 22卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
W26
引用
收藏
页码：S418 / S419
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of cross-sectional geometry of the proximal femur in white and black women from Detroit and Johannesburg
    Nelson, DA
    Pettifor, JM
    Barondess, DA
    Cody, DD
    Uusi-Rasi, K
    Beck, TJ
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2004, 19 (04) : 560 - 565
  • [2] The growing skeleton: A comparison of MRI, DXA, and cross-sectional geometric changes at the proximal femur over 7-months.
    McKay, HA
    Heinonen, A
    Petit, MA
    Khan, KM
    Forkheim, K
    Forster, B
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2001, 16 : S174 - S174
  • [3] Disproportional geometry of the proximal femur in patients with Turner syndrome: a cross-sectional study
    Nissen, N.
    Gravholt, C. H.
    Abrahamsen, B.
    Hauge, E. M.
    Jensen, J. -E. Bech
    Mosekilde, L.
    Brixen, K.
    CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2007, 67 (06) : 897 - 903
  • [4] Evaluating accuracy of structural geometry by DXA methods with an anthropometric proximal femur phantom
    Khoo, B. C. C.
    Beck, T. J.
    Brown, K.
    Price, R. I.
    AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2013, 36 (03) : 279 - 287
  • [5] Evaluating accuracy of structural geometry by DXA methods with an anthropometric proximal femur phantom
    B. C. C. Khoo
    T. J. Beck
    K. Brown
    R. I. Price
    Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 2013, 36 : 279 - 287
  • [6] A comparison of DXA measurement at the lumbar spine and proximal femur for premenopausal women
    Salamat, M. R.
    Farzaneh, S. R.
    Salari, A. H.
    Ziaei, H. R.
    Mir Bagheri, M.
    Company, K.
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 18 : S52 - S53
  • [7] Geometry of the proximal femur in relation to age and sex: A cross-sectional study in healthy adult Danes
    Nissen, N
    Hauge, EM
    Abrahamsen, B
    Jensen, JEB
    Mosekilde, L
    Brixen, K
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2005, 46 (05) : 514 - 518
  • [8] Activity, ontogeny, and cross-sectional geometry of the femur and tibia
    Pearson, O. M.
    Petersen, T. R.
    Sparacello, V. S.
    Daneshvari, S.
    Mlady, G.
    Grine, F. E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2011, 144 : 237 - 237
  • [9] Bone Density and Cross-sectional Geometry of the Proximal Femur Are Bilaterally Elevated in Elite Cricket Fast Bowlers
    Lees, Matthew J.
    Beggs, Clive B.
    Barlow, Matthew J.
    Rutherford, Zoe H.
    Bansil, Kunwar
    Gannon, Lisa
    Hind, Karen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2018, 21 (03) : 399 - 405
  • [10] Cross-sectional geometry, bone strength, and bone mass in the proximal femur in black and white postmenopausal women
    Nelson, DA
    Barondess, DA
    Hendrix, SL
    Beck, TJ
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (10) : 1992 - 1997
12345