Response to a selection index including environmental costs and risk preferences of producers

被引:8
|
作者
Ali, Beshir M. [1 ]
Bastiaansen, John W. M. [2 ]
de Mey, Yann [1 ]
lansink, Alfons G. J. M. Oude [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Business Econ Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ & Res, Anim Breeding & Genom, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
economic value; environmental impact; pigs; risk aversion; selection index; RESIDUAL FEED-INTAKE; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; ECONOMIC WEIGHTS; REPRODUCTION TRAITS; GROWING PIGS; LITTER SIZE; IMPACT; VALUES; POPULATIONS;
D O I
10.1093/jas/sky400
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Genetic improvement of animals plays an important role in improving the economic and environmental sustainability of livestock production systems. This paper proposes a method to incorporate mitigation of environmental impacts and risk preferences of producers into a breeding objective via economic values (EVs). The paper assesses the effects of using these alternative EVs of breeding goal traits on discounted economic response to selection and on environmental impacts at commercial farm level. The application focuses on a Brazilian pig production system. Separate dam-and sire-line breeding programs that supply parents in a 3-tier production system for producing crossbreds (fattening pigs) at commercial level were assumed. Using EVs that are derived from utility functions by incorporating risk aversion increases the cumulative discounted economic response to selection in sire-line selection (6%) while reducing response in dam-line selection (12%) compared with the use of traditional EVs. The use of EVs that include environmental costs increases the cumulative discounted social response to selection in both dam-line (5%) and sire-line (10%) selections. Emission of greenhouse gases, and excretion of nitrogen and phosphorus can be reduced more with genetic improvements of production traits than reproduction traits for the typical Brazilian farrow-to-finish pig farm. Reductions in environmental impacts do not, however, depend on the use of the different EVs (i.e., with and without taking into account environmental costs and risk). Both environmental costs and risk preferences of producers need to be considered in sire-line selection, and only environmental costs in dam-line selection to improve, at the same time, the economic and environmental sustainability of the Brazilian pig production system.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 171
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk Preferences of Commodity Crop Producers and Specialty Crop Producers
    Zhao, Shouli
    Yue, Chengyan
    Kong, Xiangwen
    HORTSCIENCE, 2019, 54 (09) : S12 - S13
  • [2] A risk index for software producers
    Leung, HKN
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1996, 8 (05): : 281 - 294
  • [3] RISK PREFERENCES OF DAIRY AND HOG PRODUCERS IN QUEBEC
    GUNJAL, K
    LEGAULT, B
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIE RURALE, 1993, 41 (04): : 507 - 507
  • [4] RISK PREFERENCES OF DAIRY AND HOG PRODUCERS IN QUEBEC
    GUNJAL, K
    LEGAULT, B
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIE RURALE, 1995, 43 (01): : 23 - 35
  • [5] RISK PREFERENCES AND TRANSACTION COSTS
    DEMEZA, D
    DICKINSON, PT
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1984, 5 (02) : 223 - 236
  • [6] Risk Preferences, Transaction Costs, and Choice of Marketing Contracts: Evidence from a Choice Experiment with Fresh Vegetable Producers
    Vassalos, Michael
    Hu, Wuyang
    Woods, Timothy
    Schieffer, Jack
    Dillon, Carl
    AGRIBUSINESS, 2016, 32 (03) : 379 - 396
  • [7] Environmental and business risk management perceptions and preferences: evidence from snowball sampling of Turkish avocado producers
    Njavro, Mario
    Pekin, Ozgun Ezgi
    Cop, Tajana
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 24 (03): : 777 - 788
  • [9] Measuring producers' risk preferences: A global risk-attitude construct
    Pennings, JME
    Garcia, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 83 (04) : 993 - 1009
  • [10] Risk preferences of commodity crop producers and specialty crop producers: An application of prospect theory
    Zhao Shuoli
    Yue Chengyan
    AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 51 (03) : 359 - 372