Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis

被引:3
|
作者
Archer, James E. [1 ]
Baird, Charles [1 ]
Gardner, Adrian [1 ,2 ]
Rushton, Alison B. [3 ]
Heneghan, Nicola R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Orthopaed Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Coll Life & Environm Sci, Sch Sport Exercise & Rehabil Sci, Ctr Precis Rehabil Spinal Pain CPR Spine, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[3] Western Univ, Sch Phys Therapy, Fac Hlth Sci, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Adult scoliosis; Health-related quality of life; Systematic review; LOW-BACK-PAIN; SPINAL DEFORMITY; RESEARCH SOCIETY; LUMBAR SCOLIOSIS; OUTCOMES; TERMINOLOGY; TAXONOMY; COSMIN;
D O I
10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Adult scoliosis represents a distinct subgroup of scoliosis patients for whom the diagnosis can have a large impact on their health-related quality of life (HR-QOL). Therefore, HR-QOL patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential to assess disease progression and the impact of interventions. The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the measurement properties of HR-QOL PROMs in adult scoliosis patients. Methods: We will conduct a literature search, from their inception onwards, of multiple electronic databases including AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Medline, PsychINFO and PubMed. The searches will be performed in two stages. For both stages of the search, participants will be aged 18 and over with a diagnosis of scoliosis. The primary outcome of interest in the stage one searches will be studies which use PROMs to investigate HR-QOL as defined by the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) taxonomy, the secondary outcome will be to assess the frequency of use of the various PROMs. In stage two, the primary outcome of interest will be studies which assess the measurement properties of the HR-QOL PROMs identified in stage one. No specific measurement property will be given priority. No planned secondary outcomes have been identified but will be reported if discovered. In stage one, the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of systematic reviews. In Stage two the only restriction on study design will be the exclusion of full-text articles not available in the English language. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations and abstract data. Potential conflicts will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or risk of bias) will be appraised using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist. The overall strength of the body of evidence will then be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A narrative synthesis will be provided with information presented in the main text and tables to summarise and explain the characteristics and findings of the included studies. The narrative synthesis will explore the evidence for currently used PROMs in adult scoliosis patients and any areas that require further study. Discussion: The review will help clinicians and researchers identify a HR-QOL PROM for use in patients with adult scoliosis. Findings from the review will be published and disseminated through a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    James E. Archer
    Charles Baird
    Adrian Gardner
    Alison B. Rushton
    Nicola R. Heneghan
    Systematic Reviews, 10
  • [2] Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Archer, James E.
    Baird, Charles
    Gardner, Adrian
    Rushton, Alison B.
    Heneghan, Nicola R.
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2022, 10 (05) : 991 - 1002
  • [3] Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
    James E. Archer
    Charles Baird
    Adrian Gardner
    Alison B. Rushton
    Nicola R. Heneghan
    Spine Deformity, 2022, 10 : 991 - 1002
  • [4] Outcomes evaluating quality of life and their measurement properties in early-onset scoliosis: protocol for a systematic review
    Baird, Charles
    Archer, James
    Gardner, Adrian
    Rushton, Alison B.
    Heneghan, Nicola R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (09):
  • [5] Quality of life outcomes in surgically treated adult scoliosis patients: a systematic review
    Jennifer Theis
    Paul Gerdhem
    Allan Abbott
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 1343 - 1355
  • [6] Quality of life outcomes in surgically treated adult scoliosis patients: a systematic review
    Theis, Jennifer
    Gerdhem, Paul
    Abbott, Allan
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (07) : 1343 - 1355
  • [7] Outcome measures evaluating physical functioning and their measurement properties in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review
    Alamrani, Samia
    Rushton, Alison
    Gardner, Adrian
    Falla, Deborah
    Heneghan, Nicola R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (04):
  • [8] Measures of trunk muscle strength and their measurement properties: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis of clinical measures
    Althobaiti, Shouq
    Rushton, Alison
    Falla, Deborah
    Heneghan, Nicola R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (01):
  • [9] Outcomes Evaluating Quality of Life and Their Measurement Properties in Early-onset Scoliosis: A Systematic Review
    Baird, Charles
    Archer, James
    Gardner, Adrian
    Rushton, Alison
    Heneghan, Nicola R.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 42 (09) : E917 - E924
  • [10] Health-related quality of life and functional outcome measures for pediatric multiple injury: A systematic review and narrative synthesis
    Collins, Kathryn C.
    Burdall, Oliver
    Kassam, Jamila
    Firth, Gregory
    Perry, Daniel
    Ramachandran, Manoj
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2022, 92 (05): : E92 - E106