Sylvia docker memorial lecture: Together we go further-Service co-design, knowledge co-production and radical solidarity

被引:7
|
作者
Whiteford, Gail Elizabeth [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Allied Hlth & Community Wellbeing, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
[2] NSW Hlth, Mid North Coast LHD, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
关键词
occupational; epistemic and hermeneutic justice; human rights; occupational therapy; philosophy; OCCUPATIONAL-THERAPY; HEALTH RESEARCH;
D O I
10.1111/1440-1630.12628
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background/aim Occupational therapy can be essentially described as enabling social inclusion through occupational participation. How does this best happen? The answer is through working in deeply collaborative, power and knowledge sharing partnerships with individuals, families, communities and populations of people across contextual boundaries. Methods In this lecture, critical consideration is given to first, ways of working with communities of interest in service co-design, knowledge co-production and as co-researchers and how the philosophical underpinnings of the profession are consistent with such approaches. The second part of the lecture examines epistemic and hegemonic 'blind-spots' of the profession which can act as barriers to such person centred interactions, further reproducing dynamics of exclusion and marginalisation of already vulnerable persons and communities. Finally, the lecture considers the 'next era' in occupational therapy in which, in response to entrenched situations of occupational injustice globally, we may work with people in what has been termed 'radical solidarity' using de-colonising and occupation-centred approaches such as the Participatory Occupational Justice Framework and the Capabilities, Opportunities, Resources and Environments approach. Results Using approaches that represent authentic partnerships between occupational therapists and the people they serve can result in powerful and potentially transformative outcomes. This is because working with people as co-designers of services and as co-researchers in evaluating service effectiveness, means that knowledge is co-produced within specific contexts. This in turn means the traditional evidence/practice gap is closed. Conclusions Working in authentic, power sharing partnerships with diverse people in diverse settings using diverse approaches, will be the way in which occupational therapy can make its strongest societal contribution. Aligning occupational justice with epistemic and hermeneutic justice is fundamental to this vision, providing a platform in which members of the profession can work collaboratively with people and go further together towards societal change.
引用
收藏
页码:682 / 689
页数:8
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Co-Design and Co-Production of Knowledge for the Sustainable City
    West, Christina
    Marquardt, Editha
    Gerhard, Ulrike
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2017, 26 (01): : 58 - 59
  • [2] Co-design and Co-production in the Real-world Laboratory Knowledge Dialogue Northern Black Forest
    Rhodius, Regina
    Bachinger, Monika
    Pregernig, Michael
    Koch, Barbara
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2016, 25 (02): : 131 - 132
  • [3] Deconstructing the co-production ideal: Dilemmas of knowledge and representation in a co-design project with people with intellectual disabilities
    Chinn, Deborah
    Pelletier, Caroline
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, 2020, 45 (04): : 326 - 336
  • [4] The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review
    Grindell, Cheryl
    Coates, Elizabeth
    Croot, Liz
    O'Cathain, Alicia
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [5] The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review
    Cheryl Grindell
    Elizabeth Coates
    Liz Croot
    Alicia O’Cathain
    BMC Health Services Research, 22
  • [6] Together we measure: Improving public service outcomes via the co-production of performance measurement
    Yang, Cherrie
    Northcott, Deryl
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 39 (04) : 253 - 261
  • [7] Debate: The future of artificial intelligence for the co-design and co-production of public services-what do we know and what do we need to know?
    Osborne, Stephen
    Nasi, Greta
    PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 2024, 44 (06) : 446 - 448
  • [8] We have to work together: Can service users and mental health nurses co-design a post-registration curriculum?
    Hansen, Alison
    Molloy, Renee
    Wood, Tom
    D'Astoli, Pauline
    Robinson, Eddie
    Buus, Niels
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2023, 32 : 20 - 21