Propofol-alfentanil versus fentanyl-midazolam in coronary artery surgery

被引:9
|
作者
Collard, E
Delire, V
Mayne, A
Jamart, J
Louagie, Y
Gonzalez, M
Ducart, A
Broka, S
Randour, P
Joucken, K
机构
[1] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT BIOSTAT,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
[2] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT CARDIOVASC & THORAC SURG,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
[3] UNIV CATHOLIQUE LOUVAIN,UNIV HOSP MT GODINNE,DEPT INTENS CARE MED,B-5530 YVOIR,BELGIUM
关键词
propofol; alfentanil; coronary artery surgery; early extubation; hemodynamics;
D O I
10.1016/S1053-0770(96)80048-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare intraoperative hemodynamic profiles and recovery characteristics of propofol-alfentanil with fentanyl-midazolam anesthesia in elective coronary artery surgery. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: University hospital. Participants: Fifty patients with impaired or good left ventricular function. Interventions: In group 1, (n = 25) anesthesia was induced with an infusion of propofol, 3 to 4 mg/kg/h, alfentanil, 500 mu g, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg, and maintained with propofol, 3 to 6 mg/kg/h (variable rate), and alfentanil infusions, 30 mu g/kg/h (fixed rate). Additional boluses of alfentanil, 1 mg, were administered before noxious stimuli; group 2 (n = 25) received a loading dose of fentanyl, 25 mu g/kg, midazolam, 1.5 to 3 mg, and pancuronium, 0.1 mg/kg for induction, followed by an infusion of fentanyl, 7 mu g/kg/h, for maintenance. Additional boluses of midazolam (1.5 to 3 mg) and fentanyl (250 mu g) were administered before noxious stimuli. Measurements and Main Results: Cardiovascular parameters at eight intraoperative time points as well as time to extubation, morphine consumption, and pain scores were recorded. Induction of anesthesia was associated in both groups with a small but significant decrease in mean arterial pressure (1: 15 mmHg (15%); 2: 8 mmHg (8%) with significant decreases in cardiac index (1: 8%; 2: 8%) and left ventricular stroke work index (1: 24%; 2: 21%). Throughout surgery, hemodynamic profiles were comparable between groups except after intubation when the MAP was significantly lower in group 1 (75 +/- 12 mmHg) than in group 2 (89 +/- 17 mmHg). Group 1 required less inotropic support. Extubation was performed faster in group 1 (7.6 h) than in group 2 (18.0 h). Morphine requirements and pain scores were comparable between groups. Conclusions: Propofol-alfentanil anesthesia provides good intraoperative hemodynamics and allows early extubation after coronary artery surgery. Copyright (C) 1996 by W.B. Saunders Company
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 876
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PROPOFOL-ALFENTANIL OR FENTANYL-MIDAZOLAM FOR INDUCTION IN CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY
    COLLARD, E
    JAMART, J
    DUCART, A
    MAYNE, A
    DELIRE, V
    RANDOUR, P
    BROKA, S
    JOUCKEN, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 : 32 - 32
  • [2] Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) techniques for ambulatory surgery: Comparison of midazolam-fentanyl vs propofol-alfentanil
    Inagaki, Y
    SaRego, MM
    White, PF
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 : S8 - S8
  • [3] Sedation-Analgesia in Elective Colonoscopy: Propofol-Fentanyl versus Propofol-Alfentanil
    Turk, Hacer Sebnem
    Aydogmus, Meltem
    Unsal, Oya
    Koksal, Hakan Mustafa
    Acik, Mehmet Eren
    Oba, Sibel
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2013, 63 (04): : 353 - 358
  • [4] PROPOFOL-ALFENTANIL AND ISOFLURANE-ALFENTANIL IN MAJOR THORACIC-SURGERY
    BARDOCZKY, GI
    LEVARLET, M
    DEFRANCQUEN, P
    DHOLLANDER, A
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 : 87 - 87
  • [5] Effects of the combinations propofol/alfentanil and midazolam/fentanyl on blood pressure and contact phase system during coronary surgery
    Schulze, Hans-Joachim
    Wendel, Hans Peter
    Kleinhans, Martin
    Oehmichen, Siegfried
    Guggenberger, Herbert
    Heller, Wolfgang
    Hoffmeister, Hans-Eberhard
    PERFUSION-UK, 1998, 13 (05): : 338 - 345
  • [6] COMPARISON OF PROPOFOL AND FENTANYL ANESTHESIA IN CORONARY-ARTERY VERSUS VALVE SURGERY
    BELL, J
    SARTAIN, J
    WILKINSON, GAL
    SHERRY, KM
    ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 (07) : 644 - 648
  • [7] CONTINUOUS INFUSIONS OF ALFENTANIL AND PROPOFOL FOR CORONARY-ARTERY SURGERY
    ROEKAERTS, PMHJ
    GERRITS, HJ
    TIMMERMAN, BE
    DELANGE, S
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 1995, 9 (04) : 362 - 367
  • [8] Comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl and sufentanil for total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery
    Ahonen, J
    Olkkola, KT
    Hynynen, M
    Seppälä, T
    Ikävalko, H
    Remmerie, B
    Salmenperä, M
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (04) : 533 - 540
  • [9] DEXMEDETOMIDINE VERSUS PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFTING SURGERY
    Thoma, Brandi
    Pizzi, Laura
    McDaniel, Cara
    Li, Julius
    Mearns, Elizabeth
    Wordell, Cindy
    Cavarocchi, Nicholas
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (12) : U302 - U302
  • [10] Conscious sedation for middle ear surgeries: A comparison between fentanyl-propofol and fentanyl-midazolam infusion
    Thota, Raghu S.
    Ambardekar, Manasi
    Likhate, Priyamvada
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2015, 9 (02) : 117 - 121