Assessment of rigid multi-modality image registration consistency using the multiple sub-volume registration (MSR) method

被引:11
|
作者
Ceylan, C [1 ]
van der Heide, UA [1 ]
Bol, GH [1 ]
Lagendijk, JJW [1 ]
Kotte, ANTJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY | 2005年 / 50卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/50/10/N01
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Registration of different imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, functional MRI (fMRI), positron (PET) and single photon (SPECT) emission tomography is used in many clinical applications. Determining the quality of any automatic registration procedure has been a challenging part because no gold standard is available to evaluate the registration. In this note we present a method, called the 'multiple sub-volume registration' (MSR) method, for assessing the consistency of a rigid registration. This is done by registering sub-images of one data set on the other data set, performing a crude non-rigid registration. By analysing the deviations (local deformations) of the sub-volume registrations from the full registration we get a measure of the consistency of the rigid registration. Registration of 15 data sets which include CT, MR and PET images for brain, head and neck, cervix, prostate and lung was performed utilizing a rigid body registration with nonnalized mutual information as the similarity measure. The resulting registrations were classified as good or bad by visual inspection. The resulting registrations were also classified using our MSR method. The results of our MSR method agree with the classification obtained from visual inspection for all cases (p < 0.02 based on ANOVA of the good and bad groups). The proposed method is independent of the registration algorithm and similarity measure. It can be used for multi-modality image data sets and different anatomic sites of the patient.
引用
收藏
页码:N101 / N108
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of multimodality image registration consistency using multiple sub-volume registration (MSR)
    Ceylan, C
    van der Heide, UA
    Bol, GH
    Lagendijk, JJW
    Kotte, ANTJ
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 : S225 - S225
  • [2] Multi-modality non-rigid medical image registration
    Rogelj, Peter
    Kovacic, Stanislav
    ELEKTROTEHNISKI VESTNIK-ELECTROCHEMICAL REVIEW, 2007, 74 (05): : 309 - 314
  • [3] Multi-modality Image Registration using the Decomposition Model
    Ibrahim, Mazlinda
    Chen, Ke
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (ICMS4): MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES: CHAMPIONING THE WAY IN A PROBLEM BASED AND DATA DRIVEN SOCIETY, 2017, 1830
  • [4] Multi-modality image registration using local correlation
    Rösch, P
    Blaffert, T
    Weese, J
    CARS '99: COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 1999, 1191 : 228 - 232
  • [5] Multi-Modality Non-rigid Image Registration Using Local Similarity Estimations
    Rogelj, Peter
    El-Hajj-Chehade, Wassim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2021, 29 (SUPPL 1) : 31 - 50
  • [6] A more robust method for multi-modality medical image registration
    Wang Kai
    Tang Jing-tian
    Xiao Jia-ying
    Tang Yan
    Zhang Xiao-kai
    BMEI 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS, VOL 1, 2008, : 806 - +
  • [7] A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging
    Chow, PL
    Stout, DB
    Komisopoulou, E
    Chatziioannou, AF
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 51 (02): : 379 - 390
  • [8] A new multi-modality image registration algorithm
    Samant, S
    Parra, N
    Davis, B
    Sontag, M
    Narasimhan, G
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1244 - 1244
  • [9] Immobilization Bed for Multi-Modality Image Registration
    Nelson, G.
    Bazalova, M.
    Vilalta, M.
    Perez, J.
    Graves, E.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06)
  • [10] COCGV: A method for multi-modality 3D volume registration
    Ostuni, JL
    Hsu, L
    Frank, JA
    1998 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING - PROCEEDINGS, VOL 2, 1998, : 25 - 28